Advertisement

“Now We All Look Like Rapunzels”: Drawing in a Kindergarten Writing Journal

  • Leslie RechEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Landscapes: the Arts, Aesthetics, and Education book series (LAAE, volume 21)

Abstract

Though research on children and drawing is plentiful and drawing is widely used as a pedagogic tool in kindergarten classrooms, drawing is not an area of concentrated study in most teacher education programs. The aim of this chapter is to tease out relationships between children, drawing, and curriculum with an interest in locating creative and transgressive spaces in an educational climate that seems, on the surface, to have little room for such things. Using video recordings from a year-long ethnographic case study of drawing in the language arts curriculum of a public kindergarten class, I look at ways in which children employ drawing in their classroom literacy work. This project focused specifically on drawing in the kindergarten writing journal; the seated, self-directed drawing designed to facilitate or complement the language arts lesson of the day. How do young children make and use drawing in their daily negotiations between the official classroom curriculum and their own interests and desires? Using an eclectic array of theories, including Aoki’s (J Curric Superv, 8(3):255–268, 1993) notion of lived curriculum, the unofficial, child led practices of the classroom; Bennett’s (Vibrant matter: a political ecology of things. Duke University Press, Durham, 2010) vital materialism, the agency and affect of things in relation to human experience; and Bakhtin’s (The dialogic imagination: four essays. University of Texas Press, Austin, 1981) theories of dialogism, the ongoing conversation between language and the individual, I explore the subtle and not so subtle spaces of classroom drawing.

Keywords

Children’s drawing Citation Dialogic Kindergarten Language arts Lived curriculum 

References

  1. Adoniou, M. (2014). Drawing conclusions: What purpose do children’s drawings serve? Australian Art Education, 36(1), 84–105.Google Scholar
  2. Aoki, T. T. (1993). Legitimating lived curriculum: Towards a curricular landscape of multiplicity. Journal of Curriculum & Supervision, 8(3), 255–268.Google Scholar
  3. Bakhtin, M. M. (1981). In M. Holquist (Ed.), The dialogic imagination: Four essays [Voprosy literatury i estetiki. English]. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bennett, J. (2010). Vibrant matter: A political ecology of things. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (2004). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia (B. Massumi, Trans.). New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
  6. Dyson, A. H. (1986). Transitions and tensions: Interrelationships between the drawing, talking, and dictating of young children. Research in the Teaching of English, 20(4), 379–409.Google Scholar
  7. Dyson, A. H. (1990). Symbol makers, symbol weavers: How children link play, pictures, and print. Young Children, 2, 50.Google Scholar
  8. Dyson, A. H. (1997). Writing superheroes: Contemporary childhood, popular culture, and classroom literacy. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  9. Edwards, C. P., & Willis, L. M. (2000). Integrating visual and verbal literacies in the early childhood classroom. Early Childhood Education Journal, 27(4), 259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gardner, H. (1980). Artful scribbles: The significance of children’s drawings. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  11. Goodman, J. E., Tomlinson, M., & Richland, J. B. (2014). Citational practices: Knowledge, personhood, and subjectivity. Annual Review of Anthropology, 43(1), 449–463.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anthro-102313-025828.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Goodnow, J. J. (1977). Children drawing. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Grace, D., & Tobin, J. (2002). Pleasure, creativity, and the carnivalesque in children’s video production. In L. Bresler & C. M. Thompson (Eds.), The arts in children’s lives: Context, culture, and curriculum (pp. 195–214). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Graves, D. H. (2003). Writing: Teachers and children at work. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.Google Scholar
  15. Heydon, R. (2013). Learning opportunities: The production and practice of kindergarten literacy curricula in an era of change. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 45(4), 481–510.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2012.704946.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hopperstad, M. H. (2010). Studying meaning in children’ drawings. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 10(4), 430–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ivashkevich, O. (2006). Drawing in children’s lives. In J. D. Fineberg (Ed.), When we were young: New perspectives on the art of the child (pp. 45–59). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  18. Ivashkevich, O. (2009). Children’s drawing as a sociocultural practice: Remaking gender and popular culture. Studies in Art Education, 51(1), 50–63.Google Scholar
  19. Katch, J. (2001). Under deadman’s skin: Discovering the meaning of children’s violent play. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  20. Kellogg, R. (1970). Analyzing children’s art. Palo Alto, CA: National Press Books.Google Scholar
  21. Kress, G. R. (1997). Before writing: Rethinking the paths to literacy. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  22. Latour, B. (1996). On actor-network theory: A few clarifications. Soziale Welt, 4, 369.Google Scholar
  23. Lowenfeld, V., & Brittain, W. L. (1987). Creative and mental growth (8th ed.). New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  24. Mackenzie, N. (2011). From drawing to writing: What happens when you shift teaching priorities in the first six months of school? Australian Journal of Language & Literacy, 34(3), 322–340.Google Scholar
  25. Marsh, J. (2010). Childhood, culture and creativity: A literature review. Newcastle: Creativity, Culture and Education.Google Scholar
  26. National Governors Association Center for Best Practices & Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010). Common core state standards. Washington, DC: National Governors Association Center for Best Practices & Council of Chief State School Officers.Google Scholar
  27. Newkirk, T. (1989). More than stories: The range of children’s writing. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.Google Scholar
  28. Paley, V. G. (2007). HER classic: On listening to what the children say. Harvard Educational Review, 77(2), 152–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Pearson, P. (2001). Towards a theory of children’s drawing as social practice. Studies in Art Education, 42(4), 348–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Schulte, C. (2011). Verbalization in children’s drawing performances: Toward a metaphorical continuum of inscription, extension, and re-inscription. Studies in Art Education, 53(1), 20–34.Google Scholar
  31. Schulte, C. M. (2013a). Being there and becoming-unfaithful. International Journal of Education & the Arts, 14(SI 1.5). Retrieved 10-1-16 from http://www.ijea.org/v14si1/
  32. Schulte, C. M. (2013b). Verbalization as a threshold in children’s drawing encounters. Visual Arts Research, 39(2), 54–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Selvester, P., & Steffani, S. (2012). The relationship of drawing and early literacy skills development in kindergarten children. California Reader, 45(4), 15–27.Google Scholar
  34. Sherlock, S. (2014). The performativity of value : On the citability of cultural commodities. Lanham: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  35. Soundy, C. S., Guha, S., & Qiu, Y. (2007). Picture power. Young Children, 62(3), 82–88.Google Scholar
  36. Thompson, C., & Bales, S. (1991). ‘Michael doesn’t like my dinosaurs’: Conversations in a preschool art class. Studies in Art Education, 33(1), 43–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Thompson, C. M. (1999). Action, autobiography and aesthetics in young children’s self-initiated drawings. Journal of Art & Design Education, 18(2), 40.Google Scholar
  38. Thompson, C. M. (2002). Drawing together: Peer influence in preschool-kindergarten art classes. In L. Bresler & C. M. Thompson (Eds.), The arts in children’s lives: Context, culture, and curriculum (p. 129). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Thompson, C. M. (2003). Kinderculture in the art classroom: Early childhood art and the mediation of culture. Studies in Art Education, 44(2), 135.Google Scholar
  40. Thompson, C. M. (2006a). The ket aesthetic: Visual culture in childhood. In J. D. Fineberg (Ed.), When we were young : New perspectives on the art of the child (pp. 31–43). Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  41. Thompson, C. M. (2006b). Repositioning the visual arts in early childhood education: A decade of reconsideration. In B. Spodek & O. N. Saracho (Eds.), Handbook of research on the education of young children (2nd ed., pp. 223–238). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  42. Thompson, C. M. (2009). Mira! looking, listening, and lingering in research with children. Visual Arts Research, 35(1), 24–34.Google Scholar
  43. Tobin, J. J. (2000). “Good guys don’t wear hats”: Children’s talk about the media. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  44. Vollrath, M. M. (2007). Play as process: Choice, translation, reconfiguration, and the process of culture. Visual Arts Research, 43(1), 63–70.Google Scholar
  45. Wilson, B. (1997). Child art, multiple interpretations, and conflicts of interest. In A. M. Kindler (Ed.), Child development in art (pp. 81–93). Reston, VA: National Art Education Association.Google Scholar
  46. Wilson, B. (2005). More lessons from the superheroes of J. C.Holz: The visual culture of childhood and the third pedagogical site. Art Education, 58(6), 18–34.Google Scholar
  47. Wilson, B. (2007). Art, visual culture, and child/adult collaborative images: Recognizing the other-than. Visual Arts Research, 33(65), 6–20.Google Scholar
  48. Wilson, B. (2008). Research at the margins of schooling: Biographical inquiry and third-site pedagogy. International Journal of Education through Art, 4(2), 119–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Educational Theory and PracticeUniversity of GeorgiaAthensUSA

Personalised recommendations