Abstract
The notion of traditional surgical treatment for varicose veins combining crossectomy and stripping as the “gold standard” seems to have had its days. Several important steps forwards have revolutionized varicose vein treatment with the emergence of new techniques since the beginning of the twenty-first century that have called the utility of crossectomy into question. Therefore, the way for another physiopathological theory of varicose veins was opened that questions whether the saphenous vein has initial responsibility for the development of the venous disease. Consequently, it has seemed logical to envisage an approach sparing the saphenous vein with a thorough treatment of the venous reservoir by the mean of micro-phlebectomy called the ASVAL method (ambulatory selective varices ablation under local anaesthesia). The results of this saphenous-sparing strategy have been reported as equivalent to the results of techniques that involve an ablation of the saphenous vein, more aggressive for the venous physiology, if the patients are properly selected.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Literature
Mayo CH. Treatment of varicose vein. Surg Gyn Obst Br J Surg. 1906;2:385–8.
Babcock WW. A new operation for the extirpation of varicose veins of the leg. N Y Med J. 1907;86:153–6.
Trendelenburg F. Ueber die Unterbindung der Vena Saphena magna bei Unterschenkel Varicen. Beitr Klin Chir. 1890–1891;7:195–210.
Ludbrook J, Beale G. Femoral venous valves in relation to varicose veins. Lancet. 1962;1:79–81.
Franceschi C. Théorie et Pratique de la Cure Conservatrice Hémodynamique de l’Insuffisance Veineuse en Ambulatoire, Percy sous thil, Editions de l’Armaçon, 1988.
Navarro L, Min RJ, Bone C. Endovenous laser: a new minimally invasive method of treatment for varicose veins--preliminary observations using an 810 nm diode laser. Dermatol Surg. 2001;27(2):117–22.
Chandler JG, Pichot O, Sessa C, Schuller-Petrovic S, Kabnick LS, Bergan JJ. Treatment of primary insufficiency by endovenous saphenous vein obliteration. Vasc Surg. 2000;38:201–14.
Cabrera Garrido JR, Cabrera Garcia Olmedo JR, Garcia Olmedo D. Nuevo metodode esclerois en las varices trunculares. Pathol Vasc. 1993;1:55–72.
Hamel-Desnos C, Desnos P, Wollman JC, Ouvry P, Mako S, Allaert FA. Evaluation of the efficacy of polidocanol in the form of foam compared with liquid form in sclerotherapy of the greater saphenous vein: initial results. Dermatol Surg. 2003;29:1170–5.
Guex JJ. Foam sclerotherapy: an overview of use for primary venous insufficiency. Semin Vasc Surg. 2005;18:25–9.
Pittaluga P, Réa B, Barbe R, Guex JJ. Méthode ASVAL (Ablation Sélective des Varices sous Anesthésie Locale): principes et résultats préliminaires. Phlebologie. 2005;58:175–81.
Labropoulos N, Leon L, Kwon S, Tassiopoulos A, Gonzalez-Fajardo JA, Kang SS, Mansour MA, Littooy FN. Study of the venous reflux progression. J Vasc Surg. 2005;41(2):291–5.
Cooper DG, Hillman-Cooper CS, Barker SG, Hollingsworth SJ. Primary varicose veins: the sapheno-femoral junction, distribution of varicosities and patterns of incompetence. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2003;25(1):53–9.
Engelhorn CA, Engelhorn AL, Cassou MF, Salles-Cunha SX. Patterns of saphenous reflux in women with primary varicose veins. J Vasc Surg. 2005;41(4):645–51.
Pittaluga P, Chastanet S. Classification of saphenous refluxes: implications for treatment. Phlebology. 2008;23:2–9.
Pittaluga P, Chastanet S, Réa B, Barbe R, Guex JJ. Saphenous vein preservation: is it the new gold standard? Torino: Minerva Med; 2007. p. 391–9.
Labropoulos N, Kokkosis AA, Spentzouris G, Gasparis AP, Tassiopoulos AK. The distribution and significance of varicosities in the saphenous trunks. J Vasc Surg. 2010;51:96–103.
Creton D. Diamater reduction of the proximal long saphenous vein after ablation of a distal incompetent tributary. Dermatol Surg. 1999;25:394–7.
Zamboni P, Cisno C, Marchetti F, Quaglio D, Mazza P, Liboni A. Reflux elimination without any ablation or disconnection of the saphenous vein. A haemodynamic model for venous surgery. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2001;21:361–9.
Pittaluga P, Chastanet S, Locret T, Barbe R. The effect of isolated phlebectomy on reflux and diameter of the great saphenous vein: a prospective study. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2010;40:122–8.
Biemans A, Van den Bos R, Hollestein LM, et al. The effect of single phlebectomies of a large varicose tributary on great saphenous vein reflux. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2014;2:179–87.
Zolotukhin IA, Seliverstov EI, Zakharova EA, Kirienko AI. Short-term results of isolated phlebectomy with preservation of incompetent great saphenous vein (ASVAL procedure) in primary varicose veins disease. Phlebology. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1177/0268355516674415.
Rose SA, Ahmed A. Some thoughts on the etiology of varicose vein. J Cardiovasc Surg. 1986;27:534–43.
Clarke GH, Vasdekis SN, Hobbs JT, Nicolaides AN. Venous wall function in the pathogenesis of varicose veins. Surgery. 1992;111:402–8.
Travers JP, Brookes CE, Evans J, Baker DM, Kent C, Makin GS, Mayhew TM. Assessment of wall structure and composition of varicose veins with reference to collagen, elastin and smooth muscle content. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 1996;11:230–7.
Labropoulos N, Giannoukas AD, Delis K, Mansour MA, Kang SS, Nicolaides AN, Lumley J, Baker WH. Where does venous reflux start? J Vasc Surg. 1997;26:736–42.
Pittaluga P, Chastanet S, Réa B, Barbe R. Midterm results of the surgical treatment of varices by phlebectomy with conservation of a refluxing saphenous vein. J Vasc Surg. 2009;50:107–18.
Abu-Own A, Scurr JH, Coleridge Smith PD. Saphenous vein reflux without incompetence at the saphenofemoral junction. Br J Surg. 1994;81:1452–4.
Pittaluga P, Chastanet S. Predictive value of a pre-operative test for the reversibility of the reflux after phlebectomy with preservation of the great saphenous vein. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2014a;2:105.
Pittaluga P, Chastanet S. Varicose vein recurrence after pregnancy: influence of the preservation of the saphenous vein in nullipara patients. Blucher Med Proc. 2014b;1:81–2.
Pittaluga P, Chastanet S. Persistent incompetent truncal veins should not be treated immediately. Phlebology. 2015;30:98–106.
Pittaluga P, Chastanet S. Lymphatic complications after varicose veins surgery: risk factors and how to avoid them. Phlebology. 2012;27(Suppl 1):139–42.
Creton D, Rea B, Pittaluga P, Chastanet S, Allaert FA. Evaluation of the pain in varicose vein surgery under tumescent local anaesthesia using sodium bicarbonate as excipient without any intravenous sedation. Phlebology. 2012;27:368–73.
Pittaluga P, Chastanet S. Value of postoperative compression after mini invasive surgical treatment of varicose veins. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2013;1:385–91.
Pittaluga P, Chastanet S. Treatment of varicose veins by ASVAL: results at 10 years. Ann Vasc Surg. 2017;38:e10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avsg.2016.07.021. Epub 2016 Oct 11
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Pittaluga, P., Chastanet, S. (2018). Ambulatory Selective Varices Ablation Under Local Anaesthesia (ASVAL). In: Zamboni, P., Mendoza, E., Gianesini, S. (eds) Saphenous Vein-Sparing Strategies in Chronic Venous Disease. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70638-2_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70638-2_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-70637-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-70638-2
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)