Advertisement

Towards Consistent Demarcation of Enterprise Design Domains

  • Marné de VriesEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10651)

Abstract

This article supports the ideology that enterprise engineering (EE) could add more value if EE researchers focus on facilitating effective conversations within design teams to create a common understanding of the enterprise. One way of creating a common understanding is to define and demarcate enterprise design domains in a consistent way. Literature presents different conceptualisations for demarcating design domains, without using a systematic demarcation rationale. As an example, this article introduces Hoogervorst’s approach and associated enterprise design domains to highlight practical difficulties when emerging design principles are applied to four main design domains, as defined by Hoogervorst. Based on the suggestion to apply the basic system design process to demarcate the main enterprise design domains in a consistent way and addressing the need for additional design domains, we present four alternative enterprise design domains, developed via design science research. We also demonstrate the usefulness of the new design domains by presenting several examples of enterprise design cycles that occur during enterprise design.

Keywords

Enterprise design Design domains Enterprise engineering 

References

  1. 1.
    Dym, C.L., Little, P.: Engineering Design, 3rd edn. Wiley, New York (2009)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Eggert, R.J.: Engineering design, 2nd edn. High Peak Press, Idaho (2010)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dietz, J.L.G., Hoogervorst, J.A.P., Albani, A., Aveiro, D., Babkin, E., Barjis, J., Caetano, A., Huyments, P., Iijima, J., Van Kervel, S.J.H., Mulder, H., Op’t Land, M., Proper, H.A., Sanz, J., Terlouw, L., Tribolet, J., Verelst, J., Winter, R.: The discipline of enterprise engineering. Int. J. Organ. Design Eng. 3(1), 86–114 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    De Vries, M., Van der Merwe, A., Gerber, A.: Extending the enterprise evolution contextualisation model. Enterp. Inf. Syst. 11(6), 787–827 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hoogervorst, J.A.P.: Enterprise Governance and Enterprise Engineering. Springer, Diemen (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Boulding, K.E.: General systems theory: the skeleton of science. Manage. Sci. 2, 197–207 (1956)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hoogervorst, J.A.P.: Applying Foundational Insights to Enterprise Governance and Enterprise Engineering. Springer, Berlin (to be published)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Giachetti, R.E.: Design of Enterprise Systems. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2010)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Von Rosing, M., Laurier, W.: An introduction to the business ontology. Int. J. Concept. Struct. Smart Appl. 3(1), 20–41 (2015)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Proper, H.A., Lankhorst, M.M.: Enterprise architecture: towards essential sensemaking. Enterp. Model. Inf. Syst. Archit. 9(1), 5–21 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Markus, M.L., Majchrzak, A., Gasser, L.: A design theory for systems that support emergent knowledge processes. MIS Q. 26(3), 179–212 (2002)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hoogervorst, J.A.P.: The imperative of employee-centric organising and its implications for enterprise engineering. J. Organ. Design Enterp. Eng. 1, 1–16 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lapalme, J.: Organizations (and organizing) are a technology that humans know very little about. Organ. Des. Enterp. Eng. 1(1), 27–31 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Dietz, J.L.G.: Enterprise Ontology. Springer, Berlin (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Van der Meulen, T.: Towards a useful DEMO-based enterprise engineering methodology, demonstrated at an agricultural enterprise. University of Pretoria (2017, unpublished)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Dietz, J.L.G., Albani, A.: Basic notions regarding business processes and supporting information systems. Requir. Eng. 10, 175–183 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Dietz, J.L.G., Hoogervorst, J.A.P.: Enterprise ontology and enterprise architecture - how to let them evolve into effective complementary notions. GEAO J. Enterp. Archit. 1, 1–19 (2007)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gregor, S., Hevner, A.: Positioning and presenting design science research for maximum impact. MIS Q. 37(2), 337–355 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Peffers, K., Tuunanen, T., Rothenberger, M., Chatterjee, S.: A design science research methodology for information systems research. J. MIS 24(3), 45–77 (2008)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    The Open Group: TOGAF 9.1. http://pubs.opengroup.org/architecture/togaf9-doc/arch/index.html. Accessed 17 June 2017
  21. 21.
    Tompkins, J.A., White, J.A., Bozer, Y.A., Tanchoco, J.M.A.: Facilities Planning, 4th edn. Wiley, USA (2010)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Bernard, S.A.: An Introduction to Enterprise Architecture EA3, 2nd edn. Authorhouse, Bloomington (2005)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Williams, T.J.: A Reference Model for Computer Integrated Manufacturing (CIM). Purdue Research Foundation, West Lafayette (1991)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Jackson, M.C.: Systems Thinking. Wiley, Chichester (2003)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Bernus, P., Nemes, L., Schmidt, G.: Handbook on Enterprise Architecture. Springer, Berlin (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Weick, K.E., Sutcliffe, K.M., Obstfeld, D.: Organising and the process of sensemaking. Organ. Sci. 16(4), 409–421 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Ostewalder, A., Pigneur, Y., Clark, T.: Business Model Generation, 1st edn. Wiley, Hoboken (2010)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Porter, M.E.: Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance. The Free Press, New York (2004)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Theuerkorn, F.: Lightweight Enterprise Architectures. Auerbach Publications, New York (2005)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Garrett, J.J.: The Elements of User Experience: User-centered Design for the Web and Beyond, 2nd edn. New Riders Press, Berkeley (2011)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Marsick, V.J., Watkins, K.E.: Informal and indidental learning. New Dir. Adult Cont. Educ. 89, 25–34 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Hoogervorst, J.A.P.: Foundational Insights for Enterprise Governance and Enterprise Engineering - Presenting the Employee-centric Theory of Organisation. Springer, Berlin (to be published)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of PretoriaPretoriaSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations