Advertisement

OPL-ML: A Modeling Language for Representing Ontology Pattern Languages

  • Glaice K. S. Quirino
  • Monalessa P. BarcellosEmail author
  • Ricardo A. Falbo
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10651)

Abstract

Reuse has been pointed out as a promising approach for Ontology Engineering. Reuse in ontologies allows speeding up the development process and improves the quality of the resulting ontologies. The use of patterns as an approach to encourage reuse has been explored in Ontology Engineering. An Ontology Pattern (OP) captures a solution for a recurring modeling problem. Very closely related OPs can be arranged in an Ontology Pattern Language (OPL). An OPL establishes relationships between the patterns and provides a process guiding the selection and use of them for systematic problem solving. To make it easier using an OPL, the relationships between the patterns and the process for navigating them should be represented in a clear and unambiguous way. A visual notation can be used to provide a visual representation of an OPL, aiming at improving communication. To facilitate understanding an OPL and strengthen its use, this visual notation must be cognitively rich. This paper presents OPL-ML, a visual modeling language for representing OPLs.

Keywords

Ontology Pattern Language Ontology Visual notation Visual modeling language 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research is funded by the Brazilian Research Funding Agency CNPq (Processes 485368/2013-7 and 461777/2014-2) and FAPES (Process 69382549/2014).

References

  1. 1.
    Poveda-Villalón, M., Suárez-Figueroa, M.C., Gómez-Pérez, A.: Reusing ontology design patterns in a context ontology network. In: Second Workshop on Ontology Patterns, WOP 2010, Shangai, China (2010)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Falbo, R.A., Guizzardi, G., Gangemi, A., Presutti, V.: Ontology patterns: clarifying concepts and terminology. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Ontology and Semantic Web Patterns, vol. 1188, pp. 14–26. CEUR-WS.org (2013)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Blomqvist, E., Hitzler, P., Janowicz, K., Krisnadhi, A., Narock, T., Solanki, M.: Considerations regarding ontology design patterns. Semant. Web 7(1), 1–7 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ruy, F., Guizzardi, G., Falbo, R.A., Reginato, C.C., Santos, V.A.: From reference ontologies to ontology patterns and back. Data Knowl. Eng. 109, 41–69 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Blomqvist, E., Gangemi, A., Presutti, V.: Experiments on pattern-based ontology design. In: Proceedings of K-CAP 2009, pp. 41–48 (2009)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    de Almeida Falbo, R., Barcellos, M.P., Nardi, J.C., Guizzardi, G.: Organizing ontology design patterns as ontology pattern languages. In: Cimiano, P., Corcho, O., Presutti, V., Hollink, L., Rudolph, S. (eds.) ESWC 2013. LNCS, vol. 7882, pp. 61–75. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-38288-8_5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Falbo, R.A., Barcellos, M.P., Ruy, F.B., Guizzardi, G., Guizzardi, R.S.S.: Ontology pattern languages. In: Gangemi, A., Hitzler, P., Janowicz, K., Krisnadhi, A., Presutti, V. (eds.) Ontology Engineering with Ontology Design Patterns: Foundations and Applications. IOS Press (2016)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Moody, D.L.: The “Physics” of notations: toward a scientific basis for constructing visual notations in software engineering. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 35(6), 1–22 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    da Silva Teixeira, M.G., Quirino, G.K., Gailly, F., de Almeida Falbo, R., Guizzardi, G., Perini Barcellos, M.: PoN-S: a systematic approach for applying the physics of notation (PoN). In: Schmidt, R., Guédria, W., Bider, I., Guerreiro, S. (eds.) BPMDS/EMMSAD -2016. LNBIP, vol. 248, pp. 432–447. Springer, Cham (2016). doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-39429-9_27 Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wieringa, R.J.: Design Science Methodology for Information Systems and Software Engineering. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Schmidt, D., Stal, M., Rohnert, H., Buschmann, F.: Pattern-Oriented Software Architecture, Volume 2: Patterns for Concurrent and Networked Objects. Wiley Publishing, New York (2000)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kitchenham, B., Charters, S.: Guidelines for performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering - Version 2.3. EBSE Technical report EBSE -2007-01 (2007)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ruy, F.B., Falbo, R.A., Barcellos, M.P., Guizzardi, G., Quirino, G.K.S.: An ISO-based software process ontology pattern language and its application for harmonizing standards. SIGAPP Appl. Comput. Rev. 15(2), 27–40 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Falbo, R.A., Quirino, G.K., Nardi, J., Barcellos, M.P., Guizzardi, G., Guarino, N., Longo, A., Livieri, B.: An ontology pattern language for service modeling. In: 31st ACM/SIGAPP Symposium on Applied Computing, Pisa, Italy (2016)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Moody, D.L., Heymans, P., Matulevicius, R.: Visual syntax does matter: improving the cognitive effectiveness of the i* visual notation. Requir. Eng. 15(2), 141–175 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    OMG. OMG Unified Modeling Language Version 2.5 (2015)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Guerra, E., Alvez, F., Kulesza, U., Fernandes, C.: A reference architecture for organizing the internal structure of metadata-based frameworks. J. Syst. Softw. 86(5), 1239–1256 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Zdun, U.: Pattern language for the design of aspect languages and aspect composition frameworks. IEE Proc. Softw. 151(2), 67–83 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Glaice K. S. Quirino
    • 1
    • 2
  • Monalessa P. Barcellos
    • 1
    Email author
  • Ricardo A. Falbo
    • 1
  1. 1.Ontology and Conceptual Modeling Research Group (NEMO), Department of Computer ScienceFederal University of Espírito SantoVitóriaBrazil
  2. 2.Federal Institute of Espírito SantoCachoeiro de ItapemirimBrazil

Personalised recommendations