Skip to main content

Automatically Annotating Business Process Models with Ontology Concepts at Design-Time

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Conceptual Modeling (ER 2017)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 10651))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

In business process modelling, it is known that using a consistent labelling style and vocabulary improves process model quality. In this regard, several existing approaches aim at the linguistic support for labelling model elements. At the same time, domain-specific ontologies have been proposed and used to capture important process-related knowledge. However, these two areas are largely disconnected up to now. Although some research suggests annotating ontology concepts to process models, for instance, to interpret and reason about a process model, annotation has not yet gained traction in practice since it still has to be done in a highly manual effort. We thus provide an automated, language-independent methodology for using labelling assistance functionalities to identify and annotate relevant ontology concepts to process model elements using a four-step procedural model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Schreiber, G., Akkermans, H., Anjewierden, A., Hoog, R.D., Shadbolt, N.R., Wielinga, B.: Knowledge Engineering and Management: The CommonKADS Methodology. MIT Press, Cambridge (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Weske, M.: Business Process Management: Concepts, Methods, Technology. Springer, Berlin (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  3. van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Business process management: a comprehensive survey. ISRN Softw. Eng. 2013, 1–37 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. La Rosa, M., Dumas, M., Uba, R., Dijkman, R.M.: Business process model merging: an approach to business process consolidation. ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol. TOSEM, 2(2), 11:1–11:42 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Mendling, J., Strembeck, M., Recker, J.: Factors of process model comprehension-findings from a series of experiments. Decis. Support Syst. 53, 195–206 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Batini, C., Lenzerini, M.: A methodology for data schema integration in the entity relationship model. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. SE-10, 650–664 (1984)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hadar, I., Soffer, P.: Variations in conceptual modeling: classification and ontological analysis. J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 7, 20 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Fellmann, M., Zarvic, N., Metzger, D., Koschmider, A.: Requirements catalog for business process modeling recommender systems. In: 12th International Conference on Wirtschaftsinformatik (WI 2015), pp. 393–407 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Studer, R., Benjamins, V.R., Fensel, D.: Knowledge engineering: principles and methods. Data Knowl. Eng. 25, 161–197 (1998)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Guarino, N.: Formal ontology and information systems. In: Proceedings of the FOIS 1998, Trento, Italy, pp. 3–15 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Greco, G., Guzzo, A., Pontieri, L., Saccà, D.: An ontology-driven process modeling framework. In: Galindo, F., Takizawa, M., Traunmüller, R. (eds.) DEXA 2004. LNCS, vol. 3180, pp. 13–23. Springer, Heidelberg (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-30075-5_2

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Born, M., Dörr, F., Weber, I.: User-friendly semantic annotation in business process modeling. In: Weske, M., Hacid, M.-S., Godart, C. (eds.) WISE 2007. LNCS, vol. 4832, pp. 260–271. Springer, Heidelberg (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-77010-7_25

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Fill, H.-G., Schremser, D., Karagiannis, D.: A generic approach for the semantic annotation of conceptual models using a service-oriented architecture. Int. J. Knowl. Manag. 9, 76–88 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Rizopoulos, N., Mçbrien, P.: A general approach to the generation of conceptual model transformations. In: Pastor, O., Falcão e Cunha, J. (eds.) CAiSE 2005. LNCS, vol. 3520, pp. 326–341. Springer, Heidelberg (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/11431855_23

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Bögl, A., Kobler, M., Schrefl, M.: Knowledge acquisition from EPC models for extraction of process patterns in engineering domains. In: Proceedings of the 4th Multikonferenz Wirtschaftsinformatik (MKWI 2008), pp. 1601–1612 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Leopold, H., Eid-Sabbagh, R.H., Mendling, J., Azevedo, L.G., Baião, F.A.: Detection of naming convention violations in process models for different languages. Decis. Support Syst. 56, 310–325 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Pittke, F., Leopold, H., Mendling, J.: Automatic detection and resolution of lexical ambiguity in process models. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 41, 526–544 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Delfmann, P., Herwig, S., Lis, L.: Unified enterprise knowledge representation with conceptual models - capturing corporate language in naming conventions. In: Proceedings of the 30th International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS 2009) (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Leopold, H., Meilicke, C., Fellmann, M., Pittke, F., Stuckenschmidt, H., Mendling, J.: Towards the automated annotation of process models. In: Zdravkovic, J., Kirikova, M., Johannesson, P. (eds.) CAiSE 2015. LNCS, vol. 9097, pp. 401–416. Springer, Cham (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19069-3_25

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. Kugeler, M., Rosemann, M.: Fachbegriffsmodellierung für betriebliche Informationssysteme und zur Unterstützung der Unternehmenskommunikation. Informationssystem Archit. Fachaussch. 5, 8–15 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Giacomo, G.D., Lenzerini, M.: TBox and ABox reasoning in expressive description logics. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR 96) (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Chan, N.N., Gaaloul, W., Tata, S.: Assisting business process design by activity neighborhood context matching. In: Liu, C., Ludwig, H., Toumani, F., Yu, Q. (eds.) ICSOC 2012. LNCS, vol. 7636, pp. 541–549. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-34321-6_38

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  23. Koschmider, A., Hornung, T., Oberweis, A.: Recommendation-based editor for business process modeling. Data Knowl. Eng. 70, 483–503 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Li, Y., Cao, B., Xu, L., Yin, J., Deng, S., Yin, Y., Wu, Z.: An efficient recommendation method for improving business process modeling. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inform. 10, 502–513 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Smirnov, S., Weidlich, M., Mendling, J., Weske, M.: Action patterns in business process model repositories. Comput. Ind. 63, 98–111 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dennis M. Riehle .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Riehle, D.M., Jannaber, S., Delfmann, P., Thomas, O., Becker, J. (2017). Automatically Annotating Business Process Models with Ontology Concepts at Design-Time. In: de Cesare, S., Frank, U. (eds) Advances in Conceptual Modeling. ER 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10651. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70625-2_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70625-2_17

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-70624-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-70625-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics