Abstract
In evolutionary biology, bet-hedging refers to a strategy that reduces the variance of reproductive success at the cost of reduced mean reproductive success. In unpredictably fluctuating environments, bet-hedgers benefit from higher geometric mean fitness despite having lower arithmetic mean fitness than their specialist competitors. We examine the extent to which sexual reproduction can be considered a type of bet-hedging, by clarifying past arguments, examining parallels and differences to evolutionary games and presenting a simple model examining geometric and arithmetic mean payoffs of sexual and asexual reproduction. Sex typically has lower arithmetic mean fitness than asex, while the geometric mean fitness can be higher if sexually produced offspring are not identical. However, asexual individuals that are heterozygotes can gain conservative bet-hedging benefits of similar magnitude while avoiding the costs of sex. This highlights that bet-hedging always has to be specified relative to the payoff structure of relevant competitors. It also makes it unlikely that sex, at least when associated with significant male production, evolves solely based on bet-hedging in the context of frequently and repeatedly occupied environmental states. Future work could usefully consider bet-hedging in open-ended evolutionary scenarios with de novo mutations.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Paul R Armsworth and Joan E Roughgarden. The impact of directed versus random movement on population dynamics and biodiversity patterns. The American Naturalist, 165: 449–465, 2005.
Markus Arnoldini, Ima A Vizcarra, Rafael Peña-Miller, Nicolas Stocker, Médéric Diard, Viola Vogel, Robert E Beardmore, Wolf-Dietrich Hardt, and Martin Ackermann. Bistable expression of virulence genes in salmonella leads to the formation of an antibiotic-tolerant subpopulation. PLoS Biology, 12: e1001928, 2014.
Roberto Barbuti, Selma Mautner, Giorgio Carnevale, Paolo Milazzo, Aureliano Rama, and Christian Sturmbauer. Population dynamics with a mixed type of sexual and asexual reproduction in a fluctuating environment. BMC Evolutionary Biology, 12: 49, 2012.
Graham Bell. The Masterpiece of Nature: The Evolution and Genetics of Sexuality. Croom Helm, London & Canberra, 1982.
MG Bulmer and GA Parker. The evolution of anisogamy: a game-theoretic approach. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 269: 2381–2388, 2002.
Oana Carja, Robert E Furrow, and Marcus W Feldman. The role of migration in the evolution of phenotypic switching. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 281: 20141677, 2014.
Hal Caswell. Matrix population models. Sinauer Associates, 2nd edition edition, 2001.
Brian Charlesworth. Causes of natural variation in fitness: evidence from studies of drosophila populations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 112: 1662–1669, 2015.
Anne Charpentier, Madhur Anand, and Chris T Bauch. Variable offspring size as an adaptation to environmental heterogeneity in a clonal plant species: integrating experimental and modelling approaches. Journal of ecology, 100: 184–195, 2012.
Charles Darwin. On the origin of species by means of natural selection. 1859.
Imke G de Jong, Patsy Haccou, and Oscar P Kuipers. Bet hedging or not? a guide to proper classification of microbial survival strategies. Bioessays, 33: 215–223, 2011.
Stephen Ellner. Ess germination strategies in randomly varying environments. I. logistic-type models. Theoretical Population Biology, 28: 50–79, 1985.
Margaret EK Evans and John J Dennehy. Germ banking: bet-hedging and variable release from egg and seed dormancy. The Quarterly Review of Biology, 80: 431–451, 2005.
Andrew I Furness, Kevin Lee, and David N Reznick. Adaptation in a variable environment: Phenotypic plasticity and bet-hedging during egg diapause and hatching in an annual killifish. Evolution, 69: 1461–1475, 2015.
József Garay and M Barnabas Garay. Genetical reachability: When does a sexual population realize all phenotypic states? Journal of Mathematical Biology, 37: 146–154, 1998.
Alan Grafen. Formal darwinism, the individual–as–maximizing–agent analogy and bet–hedging. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 266: 799–803, 1999.
Patsy Haccou and Yoh Iwasa. Optimal mixed strategies in stochastic environments. Theoretical Population Biology, 47: 212–243, 1995.
Patsy Haccou and Yoh Iwasa. Robustness of optimal mixed strategies. Journal of Mathematical Biology, 36: 485–496, 1998.
Patsy Haccou and John M McNamara. Effects of parental survival on clutch size decisions in fluctuating environments. Evolutionary Ecology, 12: 459–475, 1998.
William D Hamilton, Peter A Henderson, and Nancy A Moran. Fluctuation of environment and coevolved antagonist polymorphism as factors in the maintenance of sex. In R.D. Alexander and D.W. Tinkle, editors, Natural selection and social behavior, pages 363–381. Chiron Press, New York, 1981.
Godfrey H. Hardy. Mendelian proportions in a mixed population. Science, 28: 49–50, 1908.
Matthew Hartfield and Peter D Keightley. Current hypotheses for the evolution of sex and recombination. Integrative zoology, 7: 192–209, 2012.
Jussi Lehtonen and Hanna Kokko. Two roads to two sexes: unifying gamete competition and gamete limitation in a single model of anisogamy evolution. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 65: 445–459, 2011.
Jussi Lehtonen and Hanna Kokko. Sex. Current Biology, 24: R305–R306, 2014.
Jussi Lehtonen, Michael D Jennions, and Hanna Kokko. The many costs of sex. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 27: 172–178, 2012.
C.M. Lessells, Rhonda R Snook, and David J Hosken. The evolutionary origin and maintenance of sperm: selection for a small, motile gamete mating type. In T.R. Birkhead, D.J. Hosken, and S. Pitnick, editors, Sperm biology: an evolutionary perspective, pages 43–67. Academic Press, London, 2009.
Xiang-Yi Li, Shun Kurokawa, Stefano Giaimo, and Arne Traulsen. How life history can sway the fixation probability of mutants. Genetics, DOI: 10.1534/genetics.116.188409, 2016.
John Maynard Smith. What use is sex? Journal of Theoretical Biology, 30: 319–335, 1971.
John Maynard Smith. A short-term advantage for sex and recombination through sib-competition. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 63: 245–258, 1976.
John Maynard Smith. The Evolution of Sex. Cambridge University press, 1978.
Michael J McDonald, Daniel P Rice, and Michael M Desai. Sex speeds adaptation by altering the dynamics of molecular evolution. Nature, 531: 233–236, 2016.
John M McNamara. Implicit frequency dependence and kin selection in fluctuating environment. Evolutionary Ecology, 9: 185–203, 1995.
John M McNamara, James N Webb, and Edmund J Collins. Dynamic optimization in fluctuating environments. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 261: 279–284, 1995.
Stephanie Meirmans, Patrick G Meirmans, and Lawrence R Kirkendall. The costs of sex: facing real-world complexities. The Quarterly Review of Biology, 87: 19–40, 2012.
Tom Philippi and Jon Seger. Hedging one’s evolutionary bets, revisited. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 4: 41–44, 1989.
Sean H Rice. A stochastic version of the price equation reveals the interplay of deterministic and stochastic processes in evolution. BMC Evolutionary Biology, 8: 1, 2008.
J. Seger and J. Brockmann. What is bet-hedging? Oxford Surveys in Evolutionary Biology, 4: 181–211, 1987.
Nathaniel P Sharp and Sarah P Otto. Evolution of sex: Using experimental genomics to select among competing theories. BioEssays, 38: 751–757, 2016.
Montgomery Slatkin. Hedging one’s evolutionary bets. Nature, 250: 704–705, 1974.
Jostein Starrfelt and Hanna Kokko. Bet-hedging – a triple trade-off between means, variances and correlations. Biological Reviews, 87: 742–755, 2012.
Michel Treisman. The evolution of sexual reproduction: a model which assumes individual selection. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 60: 421–431, 1976.
David Waxman and Joel R Peck. Sex and adaptation in a changing environment. Genetics, 153: 1041–1053, 1999.
Wilhelm Weinberg. Über den nachweis der vererbung beim menschen. Jahreshefte des Vereins für vaterländische Naturkunde in Württemberg., 64: 369–382, 1908.
Stuart A West. Sex Allocation. Princeton University Press, Princeton and Oxford, 2009.
George C Williams. Sex and evolution. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, 1975.
Acknowledgements
We thank the two anonymous reviewers for their comments and suggestions. X.L. and H.K. are grateful to the Swiss National Science Foundation. J.L. was funded by a University of New South Wales Vice-Chancellor’s Postdoctoral Research Fellowship. All authors thank the organisers of the 17th International Symposium on Dynamic Games and Applications.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Li, XY., Lehtonen, J., Kokko, H. (2017). Sexual Reproduction as Bet-Hedging. In: Apaloo, J., Viscolani, B. (eds) Advances in Dynamic and Mean Field Games. ISDG 2016. Annals of the International Society of Dynamic Games, vol 15. Birkhäuser, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70619-1_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70619-1_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Birkhäuser, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-70618-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-70619-1
eBook Packages: Mathematics and StatisticsMathematics and Statistics (R0)