Skip to main content

Institutionalization, Deinstitutionalization, and the Penrose Hypothesis

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Advances in Psychiatry

Abstract

Psychiatry began to emerge as a medical specialty and science after the French revolution with the transinstitutionalization of mentally ill from imprisonment to psychiatric hospitals. Psychiatric hospitals grew in size, many of them housing thousands of people by the end of the nineteenth century. The twentieth century was characterized by psychiatric reforms shifting services from institutions to outpatient care settings and removing large numbers of psychiatric beds. In the year 1939, the British psychiatrist Penrose pointed to a possible inverse relationship between psychiatric bed numbers and prison population rates. Prison populations were on the rise throughout the twentieth century in most countries. By the end of the twentieth century, worries about a transinstitutionalization of people from psychiatric institutions to penal justice institutions came up again. In the beginning of the twenty-first century, the Penrose hypothesis was in the focus of scientific interest again. Studies from Western Europe and South America point to a significant inverse relationship of psychiatric bed numbers and prison population rates in longitudinal data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 229.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Pelletier JF, Davidson L. At the very roots of psychiatry as a new medical specialty: the Pinel-Pussin partnership. Sante Ment Que. 2015;40:19–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Sadler JZ. Vice and mental disorders. In: Fulford B, Davies M, Gipps R, et al., editors. Oxford textbook of philosophy and psychiatry. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2013. p. 451–80.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Wilbraham L. Reconstructing Harry: a genealogical study of a colonial family ‘inside’ and ‘outside’ the Grahamstown Asylum, 1888–1918. Med Hist. 2014;58:166–87. https://doi.org/10.1017/mdh.2014.9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Nardi AE, Silva AC, Hallak JE, Crippa JA. A humanistic gift from the Brazilian emperor D. Pedro II (1825–1891) to the Brazilian nation: the first lunatic asylum in Latin America. Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2013;71:125–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Piddock S. Possibilities and realities: South Australia’s asylums in the 19th century. Australas Psychiatry. 2004;12:172–5. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1039-8562.2004.02089.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Edginton B. Moral architecture: the influence of the York retreat on asylum design. Health Place. 1997;3:91–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kosky R. From morality to madness: a reappraisal of the asylum movement in psychiatry 1800–1940. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 1986;20:180–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hunter JM, Shannon GW, Sambrook SL. Rings of madness: service areas of 19th century asylums in North America. Soc Sci Med. 1986;23:1033–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Luchins AS. The rise and decline of the American asylum movement in the 19th century. J Psychol. 1988;122:471–86. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.1988.10542952.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Weiss KJ. Asylum reform and the great comeuppance of 1894--or was it? J Nerv Ment Dis. 2011;199:631–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/NMD.0b013e318229ce94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Engstrom EJ. History of psychiatry and its institutions. Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2012;25:486–91. https://doi.org/10.1097/YCO.0b013e3283590474.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Penrose LS. Mental disease and crime: outline of a comparative study of European statistics. Br J Med Psychol. 1939;18:1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. de Girolamo G, Barale F, Politi P, Fusar-Poli P. Franco Basaglia, 1924–1980. Am J Psychiatry. 2008;165:968. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.2008.07111761.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Foot J. Franco Basaglia and the radical psychiatry movement in Italy, 1961–78. Crit Radic Soc Work. 2014;2:235–49. https://doi.org/10.1332/204986014X14002292074708.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Scheper-Hughes N, Lovell AM. Breaking the circuit of social control: lessons in public psychiatry from Italy and Franco Basaglia. Soc Sci Med. 1986;23:159–78.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Papeschi R. The denial of the institution. A critical review of Franco Basaglia’s writings. Br J Psychiatry. 1985;146:247–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Fusar-Poli P, Bruno D, Machado-De-Sousa JP, Crippa J. Franco Basaglia (1924–1980): three decades (1979–2009) as a bridge between the Italian and Brazilian mental health reform. Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2011;57:100–3. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020764009344145.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Konrad N. Ethical issues on forensic-psychiatric examinations. Ethics Med Public Health. 2016;2:119–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jemep.2016.01.016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Fakhoury W, Priebe S. Deinstitutionalization and reinstitutionalization: major changes in the provision of mental healthcare. Psychiatry. 2007;6:313–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mppsy.2007.05.008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Lamb HR, Weinberger LE. Decarceration of U.S. jails and prisons: where will persons with serious mental illness go? J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2014;42:489–94.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Turner T, Priebe S. Forget community care--reinstitutionalisation is here. Br J Psychiatry. 2002;181:253.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Priebe S, Badesconyi A, Fioritti A, Hansson L, Kilian R, Torres-Gonzales F, Turner T, Wiersma D. Reinstitutionalisation in mental health care: comparison of data on service provision from six European countries. Br Med J. 2005;330:123–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kalapos MP. Penrose’s law: methodological challenges and call for data. Int J Law Psychiatry. 2016;49(Pt A):1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlp.2016.04.006.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Large MM, Nielssen O. The Penrose hypothesis in 2004: patient and prisoner numbers are positively correlated in low-and-middle income countries but are unrelated in high-income countries. Psychol Psychother. 2009;82:113–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Biles D, Mulligan G. Mad or bad? – the enduring dilemma. Br J Criminol. 1973;13:275–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Steadman HJ, Monahan J, Duffee B, Hartstone E. The impact of state mental hospital deinstitutionalization on United States prison populations, 1968–1978. J Crim Law Criminol. 1984;75:474–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Kalapos MP. Penrose’s law: reality or fiction? Mental health system and the size of prison population – international overview. Orv Hetil. 2009;150:1321–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Hartvig P, Kjelsberg E. Penrose’s law revisited: the relationship between mental institution beds, prison population and crime rate. Nord J Psychiatry. 2009;63:51–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Mundt AP, Chow WS, Arduino M, Barrionuevo H, Fritsch R, Girala N, Minoletti A, Mitkiewicz F, Rivera G, Tavares M, Priebe S. Psychiatric hospital beds and prison populations in South America since 1990: does the Penrose hypothesis apply? JAMA Psychiat. 2015;72:112–8. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2014.2433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Larrobla C, Botega NJ. Psychiatric care policies and deinstitutionalization in South America. Actas Esp Psiquiatr. 2000;28:22–30.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Tsai AC, Venkataramani AS. A more robust test of the Penrose hypothesis. JAMA Psychiat. 2015;72:735–6. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2015.0212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Mundt AP, Chow WS, Priebe S. Testing the Penrose hypothesis-reply. JAMA Psychiat. 2015;72:736. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2015.0217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Chow WS, Priebe S. How has the extent of institutional mental healthcare changed in Western Europe? Analysis of data since 1990. BMJ Open. 2016;6:e010188. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010188.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Blüml V, Waldhor T, Kapusta ND, Vyssoki B. Psychiatric hospital bed numbers and prison population sizes in 26 European countries: a critical reconsideration of the Penrose hypothesis. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0142163. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0142163.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Mundt AP, Frančiskovič T, Gurovich I, Heinz A, Ignatyev Y, Ismayilov F, Kalapos MP, Krasnov V, Mihai A, Mir J, Padruchny D, Potocan M, Raboch J, Taube M, Welbel M, Priebe S. Changes in the provision of institutionalized mental health care in post-communist countries. PLoS One. 2012;7:e38490. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0038490.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Sisti DA, Segal AG, Emanuel EJ. Improving long-term psychiatric care: bring back the asylum. JAMA. 2015;313:243–4. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2014.16088.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Bastiampillai T, Sharfstein SS, Allison S. Increase in US suicide rates and the critical decline in psychiatric beds. JAMA. 2016;316:2591–2. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2016.16989.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Fazel S, Seewald K. Severe mental illness in 33 588 prisoners worldwide: systematic review and meta-regression analysis. Br J Psychiatry. 2012;200:364–73. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.bp.111.096370.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Fazel S, Danesh J. Serious mental disorder in 23000 prisoners: a systematic review of 62 surveys. Lancet. 2002;359:545–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Fazel S, Bains P, Doll H. Substance abuse and dependence in prisoners: a systematic review. Addiction. 2006;101:181–91. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1360-0443.2006.01316.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Mir J, Kastner S, Priebe S, Konrad N, Ströhle A, Mundt AP. Treating substance abuse is not enough: comorbidities in consecutively admitted female prisoners. Addict Behav. 2015;46:25–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2015.02.016.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Brink J. Epidemiology of mental illness in a correctional system. Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2005;18:536–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Mundt P, Kastner S, Mir J, Priebe S. Did female prisoners with mental disorders receive psychiatric treatment before imprisonment? BMC Psychiatry. 2015;15:5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Sodhi-Berry N, Knuiman M, Preen B, Alan J, Morgan A. Predictors of post-sentence mental health service use in a population cohort of first-time adult offenders in Western Australia. Crim Behav Ment Health. 2014;50(7):1097–110.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Alan J, Burmas M, Preen D, Pfaff J. Inpatient hospital use in the first year after release from prison: a Western Australian population-based record linkage study. Aust N Z J Public Health. 2011;35:264–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Baillargeon J, Binswanger IA, Penn JV, Williams BA, Murray OJ. Psychiatric disorders and repeat incarcerations: the revolving prison door. Am J Psychiatr. 2009;166:103–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Botha UA, Koen L, Joska JA, Parker JS, Horn N, Hering LM, Oosthuizen PP. The revolving door phenomenon in psychiatry: comparing low-frequency and high-frequency users of psychiatric inpatient services in a developing country. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2010;45:461–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-009-0085-6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Winkler P, Barrett B, McCrone P, Csemy L, Janouskova M, Hoschl C. Deinstitutionalised patients, homelessness and imprisonment: systematic review. Br J Psychiatry. 2016;208:421–8. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.bp.114.161943.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Mundt AP. Deinstitutionalisation, imprisonment and homelessness. Br J Psychiatry. 2016;209:349. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.209.4.349.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Frick U, Frick H, Langguth B, Landgrebe M, Hubner-Liebermann B, Hajak G. The revolving door phenomenon revisited: time to readmission in 17′145 [corrected] patients with 37′697 hospitalisations at a German psychiatric hospital. PLoS One. 2013;8:e75612. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0075612.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Fazel S, Wolf A, Palm C, Lichtenstein P. Violent crime, suicide, and premature mortality in patients with schizophrenia and related disorders: a 38-year total population study in Sweden. Lancet Psychiatry. 2014;1:44–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(14)70223-8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Moberg T, Stenbacka M, Tengstrom A, Jonsson EG, Nordstrom P, Jokinen J. Psychiatric and neurological disorders in late adolescence and risk of convictions for violent crime in men. BMC Psychiatry. 2015;15:299. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-015-0683-7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Joseph PL, Potter M. Diversion from custody. I: psychiatric assessment at the magistrates’ court. Br J Psychiatry. 1993;162:325–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Konrad N, Lau S. Dealing with the mentally ill in the criminal justice system in Germany. Int J Law Psychiatry. 2010;33:236–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

APM was supported by CONICYT, FONDECYT Regular 1160260.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Norbert Konrad .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Mundt, A.P., Konrad, N. (2019). Institutionalization, Deinstitutionalization, and the Penrose Hypothesis. In: Javed, A., Fountoulakis, K. (eds) Advances in Psychiatry. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70554-5_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70554-5_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-70553-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-70554-5

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics