Skip to main content

Understanding Public Trust

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Managing Public Trust
  • 474 Accesses

Abstract

Analyses of current scientific achievements have shown that there are some shortcomings of public trust, both in the practice of managing public organizations and in theoretical responses to the contemporary challenges of shaping trust within public organizations while establishing their external relationships. This chapter provides a framework for interpreting the specificity of trust in public organizations in the context of the concepts of publicness, particularly linkages between public trust, the effectiveness of public organizations, and the processes of creating, regaining, and sustaining public trust in public organizations. This chapter reports on the current state of knowledge about public trust and helps to further a deeper understanding of creating public trust within and between organizations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adams, B. D., Thomson, M. H., Brown, A., Sartori, J. A., Taylor, T., & Waldherr, S. (2008). Organisational trust in the Canadian forces. Toronto: HumanSystem.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agranoff, R. (2006). Inside collaborative networks: Ten lessons for public managers. Public Administration Review, 66(1), 56–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Apelt, C. (2014). Change in public organisations School of Management/Faculty of Business Queensland University of Technology. Retrieved from https://eprints.qut.edu.au/73086/2/ Christina_Apelt_Thesis.pdf. 16 June 2017.

  • Arrow, K. (1974). The limits of organization. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blind, P. K. (2006, November). Building trust in government in the twenty-first century: Review of literature and emerging. Issues, 3–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blomqvist, K., & Stahle, P. (2000). Building organizational trust. Paper presented at the 16th Annual IMP Conference, Bath.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouckaert, G. (2012). Trust and public administration. Administration, 60(1), 91–115, Retrieved from: http://unpan1.un.org/intradoc/groups/public/documents/un/unpan025062.pdf. 18 July 2017.

  • Boyne, G. A. (1998). Public services under new labour: Back to bureaucracy? Public Money and Management, 18(3), 43–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyne, G. A. (2002). Public and private management: What’s the difference? Journal of Management Studies, 39(1), 97–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bozeman, B. (1984). Dimensions of publicness: An approach to public organizational theory. In B. Bozeman & J. Straussman (Eds.), New directions in public administration (pp. 46–62). Belmont: Crooks/Cole.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bozeman, B. (1987). All organizations are public: Bridging public and private organizational theories. San-Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bozeman, B. (2007). Public values and public interest: Counterbalancing economic individualism. Washington: Georgetown University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bozeman, B. (2013). What organization theorists and public policy researchers can learn from one another: Publicness theory as a case-in-point. Organization Studies, 34(2), 169–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bozeman, B., & Bretschneider, S. (1994). The “publicness puzzle” in organization theory: A test of alternative explanations of differences between public and private organizations. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 4(2), 197–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bozeman, B., & Moulton, S. (2011). Integrative publicness: A framework for public management strategy and performance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21(suppl 3), i363–i380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Candlin, C. N., & Crichton, J. (2013). Discourses of trust. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, T. L., & Bryer, T. A. (2012). William Robertson: Exemplar of politics and public management rightly understood. In N. M. Riccucci (Ed.), Serving public interest. Profiles of successful and innovate public servants (pp. 48–58). Armonk: M.E. Sharpe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dye, T. R. (1992). Understanding public policy. Inglewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukuyama, F. (1996). Trust: Human nature and the reconstitution of social order. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haque, S. (2001). The diminishing publicness of public service under the current mode of governance. Public Administration Review, 61(1), 65–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hardin, R. (2009). Zaufanie [Trust], Sic!, Warszawa.

    Google Scholar 

  • John, P. (1998). Analysing public policy. London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klijn, E. H. (2008). Governance and governance networks in Europe: An assessment of 10 years of research on the theme. Public Management Review, 10(4), 505–525.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kożuch, B. (2011). Skuteczne współdziałanie organizacji publicznych i pozarządowych [Effective cooperation between public and non-governmental organszations]. Kraków: Instytut Spraw Publicznych, Uniwersytet Jagielloński.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kożuch, B. (2014). Organizacyjna perspektywa zaufania publicznego: zarys koncepcji [An outline of an organisationorganizational perspective of public trust]. Przedsiębiorczość i Zarządzanie: Zarządzane Humanistyczne, 1, 41–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kożuch, B., & Dobrowolski, Z. (2014). Creating public trust. An organisational perspective. Peter Lang: Frankfurt am Main.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kożuch, B., & Sienkiewicz-Małyjurek, K. (2013). Collaborative networks as a basis for internal economic security in sustainable local governance. The case of Poland. In K. Raczkowski & F. Schneider (Eds.), The economic security of business transactions. Oxford: Chartridge Books Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kożuch A., Kożuch B., Sułkowski Ł., Bogacz-Wojtanowska E., Lewandowski M., Sienkiewicz-Małyjurek K., Szczudlińska-Kanoś A., & Jung-Konstanty S. (2016). Obszary zarządzania publicznego [Areas of public management]. Kraków: Instytut Spraw Publicznych, Uniwersytet Jagielloński.

    Google Scholar 

  • Llewellyn, S., Brooks, S., & Mahon, A. (2013). Trust and confidence in government and public services. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynn, L. E. (1981). Managing the public’s business. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. The Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 709–734.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noordegraaf, M. (2015). Public management. Performance, professionalism and politics. London: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nutt, P. C., & Backoff, R. W. (1993). Organizational publicness and its implications for strategic management. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 3(2), 209–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollit, C. (1990). Managerialism and the public services. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. D., Leonardi, R., & Nanetti, R. (1993). Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raadschelders, J. (2003). Government. A public administration perspective. Armonk: M.E. Sharpe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rainey, H. G. (1983). Public agencies and private firms: Incentive structures, goals, and individual roles. Administration and Society, 15, 207–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rainey, H. G. (2014). Understanding and managing public organizations (5th ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rainey, H. G., & Bozeman, B. (2000). Comparing public and private organizations. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10(2), 447–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rainey, H. G., Backoff, R. W., & Levine, C. H. (1976). Comparing public and private organizations. Public Administration Review, 36(2), 233–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riccucci, N. M. (Ed.). (2012). Serving public interest. Profiles of successful and innovate public servants. Armonk: M.E. Sharpe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbloom, D. H., & Goldman, D. (1989). Public administration: Understanding management, politics, and law in the public sector. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, R. B. (1997). Trust in ballance. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shockley-Zalabak, P., Ellis, K., & Cesaria, R. (2000/2003). Measuring organizational trust: Crosscultural survey and index. IABC Research Foundation, San Francisco. (after M.L. Watson, can there be just one trust? A cross-disciplinary identification of trust definitions and measurement. Retrieved from http://www.clayton.k12.mo.us/cms/lib/MO01000419/Centricity/Domain/2/NSPRA2009/2004_Watson.pdf. 31 July 2017.

  • Shockley-Zalabak, P., Morreale, S. P., & Hackman, M. Z. (2010). Building the high-trust organization. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sitkin, S. B., & Roth, N. L. (1993). Explaining the limited effectiveness of legalistic “remedies” for trust/distrust. Organizational Science, 4, 367–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sztompka, P. (1999). Trust: A sociological theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tholen, B. (2016). Drawing the line: On the public/private distinction in debates on new modes of governance. Public Integrity, 18(3), 237–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van de Walle, S., Van Roosbroek, S., & Bouckaert, G. (2008). Trust in the public sector: Is there any evidence for a long-term decline? International Review of Administrative Sciences, 74(1), 47–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warren, M. E. (2006). Democracy and deceit. Regulating appearances of corruption. American Journal of Political Science, 50(1), 160–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zaheer, A., McEvily, B., & Perrone, V. (1998). Does trust matter? Exploring the effects of interorganizational and interpersonal trust on performance. Organization Science: A Journal of the Institute of Management Sciences, 9(2), 141–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zucker, L. G. (1986). Production of trust: Institutional sources of economic structure,1840–1920. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 8). Greenwich: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Kożuch, B. (2018). Understanding Public Trust. In: Kożuch, B., Magala, S., Paliszkiewicz, J. (eds) Managing Public Trust. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70485-2_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics