Abstract
One of the main challenges for communicating climate change is to convey information so that it translates from a merely cognitive exercise to behavioural change and effective action. Recent studies point to the need to better address emotions, norms, values and trust in order to trigger behavioural change. This article explores the potential of performative methods to address this challenge, by documenting the author’s experience as part of a theatre group formed by young sustainability researchers and practitioners. Taking an autoethnographic approach, I first describe the method developed by the group for co-creating plays and performing them at academic conferences. Then, drawing on insights from arts-based research, I identify six performative functions of this communication format: providing access to different ways of knowing and doing, integrating and articulating complexity, humanising discourses, creating a platform for deliberation and promoting self-reflexivity and social learning. Based on the autoethnographic analysis, I argue that performative methods can be a potent tool for science communication to produce knowledge that is transformative. However, bridging the arts and sciences is a time-consuming process, which requires us as academics to engage in the process of questioning our own values and belief systems.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Adger N, Barnett J, Brown K, Marshall N, O’Brien KL (2013) Cultural dimensions of climate change impacts and adaptation. Nat Clim Change 3:112–117
Akerlof K, Maibach EW, Fitzgerald D, Cedeno AY, Neuman A (2012) Do people “personally experience” global warming, and if so how, and does it matter? Glob Environ Change 23(1):81–91
Barone T, Eisner EW (2012) Arts based research. Sage Publications, Los Angeles CA
Boal A (1992) Games for actors and non-actors. Routledge, New York
Boal A (1995) The rainbow of desire: the Boal method of theatre and therapy. Routledge, London, New York
Bochner A (1994) Perspectives on inquiry II: theories and stories. In: Knapp M, Miller GR (eds) Handbook of interpersonal communication, 2nd edn. Sage, Thousand Oaks CA, pp 21–41
Budescu DV, Por H, Broomell SB (2012) Effective communication of uncertainty in the IPCC reports. Clim Change 113(2):181–200
Corner A, Markowitz E, Pidgeon N (2015) Public engagement with climate change: the role of human values. Wiley Interdisc Rev Clim Change 5:411–422
CRED (Center for Research on Environmental Decisions) (2009) The psychology of climate change communication: a guide for scientists, journalists, educators, political aides, and the interested public. CRED, Columbia University, New York
Dietz T (2013) Bringing values and deliberation to science communication. Proc Natl Acad Sci 110:14081–14087
Dupuis SL, Mitchell G, Jonas-Simpson C, Whyte C, Gillies J, Carson J (2016) Igniting transformative change in dementia care through research-based drama. The Geronotologist 56(6):1042–1052
Eden S (1996) Public participation in environmental policy: considering scientific, counter-scientific and non-scientific contributions. Public Underst Sci 5:183–204
Ellis C, Adams TE, Bochner AP (2010) Autoethnography: an overview. Forum Qual Soc Res, 12(1), Art. 10. http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/1589. Accessed 27 Sept 2016
Esbjörn-Hargens S (2010) An ontology of climate change, integral pluralism and the enactment of multiple objects. J Integr Theory Pract 5(1):143–174
Freiburg Scientific Theatre e.V. (2016) http://www.scientific-theatre.org. Accessed 27 Sept 2016
Freire P (1970) Pedagogy of the oppressed. Penguin, London
Gardner GT, Stern PC (2002) Environmental problems and human behavior. Pearson Custom Publishing, Boston MA
Gehart D, Tarragona M, Bava S (2007) A collaborative approach to research and inquiry. In: Anderson H, Gehart D (eds) Collaborative therapy: relationships and conversations that make a difference. Routledge, London, pp 367–390
Goldstein T, Gray J, Salisbury J, Snell P (2014) When educational research meets theatre: the complexities of performed research ethnography and research informed theatre project design. Qual Inq 20(5):674–685
Gray J (2009) Theatrical reflections of health: physically impacting health research. Appl Theatre Researcher/IDEA J 10(4):1–10
Gray J, Kontos P (2015) Immersion, embodiment, and imagination: moving beyond an aesthetic of objectivity in research-informed performance in health. Forum Qual Soc Res 16(2), Art. 29. http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/2288. Accessed 27 Sept 2016
Heras M, Tàbara JD (2014) Let’s play transformations! performative methods for sustainability. Sustain Sci 9(3):379–398
Holman Jones S (2005) Autoethnography: making the personal political. In: Denzin NK, Lincoln YS (eds) Handbook of qualitative research. Sage, Thousand Oaks CA, pp 763–791
Hulme M (2009) Why we disagree about climate change: understanding controversy, inaction and opportunity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Jorgenson J (2002) Engineering selves: negotiating gender and identity in technical work. Manag Commun Q 15(3):350–380
Kahan DM, Peters E, Wittlin M, Slovic P, Ouellette LL, Braman D, Mandel G (2012) The polarizing impact of science literacy and numeracy on perceived climate change risks. Nat Clim Change 2:732–735
Kontos P, Miller KL, Gilbert JE, Mitchell GJ, Colantonio A, Keightley ML, Cott C (2012) Improving client-centered brain injury rehabilitation through research-based theater. Qual Health Res 22(12):1612–1632
Leavy P (2009) Method meets art: arts-based research practice. The Guilford Press, New York, London
Lévesque MC, Dupéré S, Morin N, Côté J, Roberge N, Laurin I, Charbonneau A, Loignon C, Bedos C (2015) Translating knowledge on poverty to humanize care: benefits and synergies of community engagement with the arts. Educ Action Res 23(2):207–224
Lorenzoni I, Nicholson-Cole S, Whitmarsh L (2007) Barriers perceived to engaging with climate change among the UK public and their policy implications. Glob Environ Change 17:445–459
Mitchell GJ, Jonas-Simpson C, Ivonoffski V (2006) Research-based theatre: the making of I’m Still Here. Nurs Sci Q 19(3):198–206
Mitchell GJ, Dupuis S, Jonas-Simpson C, Whyte C, Carson J, Gillis J (2011) The experience of engaging with research-based drama: evaluation and explication of synergy and transformation. Qual Inq 17(4):379–392
Moore J (2005) Is Higher Education ready for transformative learning? A question explored in the study of sustainability. J Transformative Educ 3:76–91
Moser SC (2006) Talk of the city: Engaging urbanites on climate change. Environ Res Lett 1:1–10
Moser SC (2010) Communicating climate change: history, challenges, process and future directions. Wiley Interdisc Rev Clim Change 1(1):31–53
Moser SC (2016) Reflections on climate change communication research and practice in the second decade of the 21st century: what more is there to say? WIREs Clim Change 7:345–369
Moser SC, Dilling L (2011) Communicating climate change: closing the science-action gap. In: Dryzek JS, Norgaard RB, Schlosberg D (eds) The Oxford handbook of climate change and society. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 161–174
Nerlich B, Koteyko N, Brown B (2010) Theory and language of climate change communication. Wiley Interdisc Rev Clim Change 1:97–110
Nicholson H (2005) Applied drama: the gift of theatre. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke UK
O’Connor R, Bord RJ, Yarnal B, Wiefek N (2002) Who wants to reduce greenhouse gas emissions? Soc Sci Q 83(1):1–17
Persson J, Sahlin N-E, Wallin A (2015) Climate change, values, and the cultural cognition thesis. Environ Sci Policy 52:1–5
Reed MS, Evely AC, Cundill G, Fazey IRA, Glass J, Laing A, Newig J, Parrish B, Prell C, Raymond C, Stringer L (2010) What is social learning? Ecol Soc 15(4):r1
Richardson L (2000) Writing: a method of inquiry. In: Denzin NK, Lincoln YS (eds) Handbook of qualitative research. Sage, Thousand Oaks CA, pp 923–948
Roeser S (2012) Risk communication, public engagement, and climate change: a role for emotions. Risk Anal 32(6):1033–1040
Rommetveit K, Funtowicz S, Strand R (2010) Knowledge, democracy and action in response to climate change. In: Bhaskar R, Frank C, Høyer KG, Naess P, Parker J (eds) Interdisciplinarity and climate change. Routledge, Abingdon, pp 149–163
Rossiter K, Kontos P, Colantonio A, Gilbert J, Gray J, Keightley M (2008) Staging data: theatre as a tool for analysis and knowledge transfer in health research. Soc Sci Med 66(1):130–146
Scheffer M, Bascompte J, Bjordam TK, Carpenter SR, Clarke LB, Folke C, Marquet P, Mazzeo N, Meerhoff M, Sala O, Westley FR (2015) Dual thinking for scientists. Ecol Soc 20(2):3
Schoenefeld JJ, McCauley MR (2016) Local is not always better: the impact of climate information on values, behavior and policy support. J Environ Stud Sci 6(4):724–732
Spence A, Pidgeon N (2010) Framing and communicating climate change: the effects of distance and outcome frame manipulations. Glob Environ Change 20(4):656–667
Wall S (2006) An autoethnography on learning about autoethnography. Int J Qual Methods 5(2):146–160
Wirth V, Prutsch A, Grothmann T (2014) Communicating climate change adaptation—state of the art and lessons learned from ten OECD countries. GAIA Ecol Perspect Sci Soc 23:30–39
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Juárez-Bourke, S. (2018). Performative Methods for Climate Change Communication in Academic Settings: Case Study of the Freiburg Scientific Theatre. In: Leal Filho, W., Manolas, E., Azul, A., Azeiteiro, U., McGhie, H. (eds) Handbook of Climate Change Communication: Vol. 3. Climate Change Management. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70479-1_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70479-1_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-70478-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-70479-1
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)