Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Washback

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Sociocultural Activity of High Stakes Standardised Language Testing

Part of the book series: English Language Education ((ELED,volume 12))

Abstract

This chapter introduces and conceptualises the phenomenon known as washback within language testing. In three parts, a review of washback literature begins with an historical overview of the origins of the phenomenon, and traces early hypotheses and models in language testing. Part two of the chapter explores the nature and scope of washback and discusses its many dimensions and relationships to other similar concepts in language testing. Part three then provides a summary of key findings that have emerged from empirical studies that have specifically focused on washback on learning. Findings from these studies guide the central study presented in Chaps. 6, 7 and 8 of this volume and are further discussed in Chaps. 9, 10 and 11.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alderson, J. C. (1986). Innovations in language testing. In M. Portal (Ed.), Innovations in language testing: Proceedings of the IUS/NFER conference (pp. 93–105). Windsor: NFER-Nelson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alderson, J. C. (2004). Forward. In L. Cheng, Y. Watanabe, & A. Curtis (Eds.), Washback in language testing: Research context and methods (pp. ix–xii). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alderson, J. C., & Hamp-Lyons, L. (1996). TOEFL preparation courses: A study of washback. Language Testing, 13, 280–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alderson, J. C., & Wall, D. (1993). Does washback exist? Applied Linguistics, 14, 115–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, S. (2004). Washback and curriculum innovation. In L. Cheng, Y. Watanabe, & A. Curtis (Eds.), Washback in Language testing: Research contexts and methods (pp. 37–50). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, S., Fullilove, J., & Wong, Y. (2002). Targeting washback – A case study. System, 30(2), 207–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bachman, L. F., & Palmer, A. S. (1996). Language testing in practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, K. M. (1996). Working for washback: A review of the washback concept in language testing. Language Testing, 13, 257–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, K. M. (1999). Washback in language testing. Princeton: Educational Testing Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berwick, R., & Ross, S. (1989). Motivation after matriculation: Are Japanese learners of English still alive after exam hell? Japan Association for Language Teaching Journal, 11, 193–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Booth, D., & Lee, N. (2014). TOEFL is TOEFL and class is class: Exploring the washback of the paper-based TOEFL at one Japanese University. Paper presented at The 1st IRI Research Forum. Kansai Gaidai University, Osaka.

    Google Scholar 

  • Booth, D., & Lee, N. (2016). Learner conceptualizations and washback of the paper-based TOEFL test on student affect at one Japanese university. Paper presented at The 2nd IRI Research Forum. Kansai Gaidai University, Osaka.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. D. (1997). Do tests washback on the language classroom? The TESOLANZ Journal, 5(5), 63–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buck, G. (1988). Testing listening comprehension in Japanese university entrance exams. JALT Journal, 10, 15–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burrows, C. (2001). Searching for washback: The impact of assessment in the certificate in spoken and written English. In G. Brindley & C. Burrows (Eds.), Studies in immigrant English language assessment (pp. 95–187). Sydney: National Centre for English Language Teaching and Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, L. (1997). How does washback influence teaching? Implications for Hong Kong. Language and Education, 11, 38–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, L. (1998a). The washback effect of public examination change on classroom teaching: An impact study of the 1996 Hong Kong certificate of education in English on the classroom teaching of English in Hong Kong secondary schools. Unpublished doctoral thesis, University of Hong Kong.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, L. (1998b). Impact of a public English examination change on students’ perceptions and attitudes toward their English learning. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 24(3), 279–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, L. (2004). The washback effect of a public examination change on teachers’ perceptions toward their classroom teaching. In L. Cheng, Y. Watanabe, & A. Curtis (Eds.), Washback in language testing: Research contexts and methods (pp. 147–170). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, L. (2005). Changing language teaching through language testing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, L., & Curtis, A. (2004). Washback or backwash: A review of the impact of testing on teaching and learning. In L. Cheng, Y. Watanabe, & A. Curtis (Eds.), Washback in language testing: Research contexts and methods (pp. 3–18). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, L., Watanabe, Y., & Curtis, A. (Eds.). (2004). Washback in language testing: Research contexts and methods. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, L., Sun, Y., & Ma, J. (2015). Review of washback research literature within Kane’s argument-based validation framework. Language Teaching, 48, 436–470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cho, E. (2010). Washback on the CSAT English test on high school students’ language learning. Unpublished master’s thesis, Keimyung University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choi, I. (2008). The impact of EFL testing on EFL education in Korea. Language Testing, 25(1), 39–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cizek, G. J. (2001). More unintended consequences of high-stakes testing. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 20(4), 19–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies, A. (1997). Demands of being professional in language testing. Language Testing, 14(3), 328–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferman, I. (2004). The washback of an EFL national oral matriculation test to teaching and learning. In L. Cheng, Y. Watanabe, & A. Curtis (Eds.), Washback in language testing: Research contexts and methods. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frederiksen, J. R., & Collins, A. (1989). A system approach to educational testing. Educational Researcher, 18(9), 27–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gosa, C. M. C. (2004). Investigating washback: A case study using student diaries. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Lancaster University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, A. (2007). IELTS washback in context: Preparation for academic writing in higher education (Studies in language testing, Vol. 25). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamp-Lyons, L. (1991). Reconstructing ‘academic writing proficiency’. In L. Hamp-Lyons (Ed.), Assessing second language writing (pp. 23–329). Norwood: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamp-Lyons, L. (1998). Ethical test preparation practice: The case of TOEFL. TESOL Quarterly, 32, 329–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, B., & John, R. (2004). IELTS preparation in New Zealand: Preparing students for the IELTS Academic Module. In L. Cheng, Y. Watanabe, & A. Curtis (Eds.), Washback in language testing (pp. 97–112). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heyneman, S. P. (1987). Use of examinations in developing countries: Selection, research, and education sector management. International Journal of Education Development, 7, 251–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, A. (1988). Introducing a needs-based test of English language proficiency into an English medium university in Turkey. In A. Hughes (Ed.), Testing English for university study (ELT Documents #127) (pp. 134–146). London: Modern English Publications in association with the British Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, A. (1993). Backwash and TOEFL 2000. Unpublished manuscript. Reading: University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hwang, H. J. (2003). The impact study of high-stakes exams on teachings and students: A washback study of the university entrance exam at the secondary school level in South Korea. Quebec: McGill University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ikeda, M. (2005, March). Untitled presentation. Paper presented at the TOEIC Training Seminar sponsored by the TOEIC kenkyuu-kai.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iwabe, K. (2005, March). Untitled presentation. Paper presented at the TOEIC Training Seminar sponsored by IIBC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jung, H. (2008). The washback effects of English listening test in Korean CSAT on secondary school English learning and teaching. The Linguistic Association of Korea Journal, 16(3), 143–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kane, M. (2006). Validation. In R. L. Brennan (Ed.), Educational measurement (4th ed., pp. 17–64). Westport: American Council on Education/Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kane, M. (2013). Validating the interpretations and uses of test scores. Journal of Educational Measurement, 50(1), 1–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, D., & O, K. (2002). Washback on 12th grade English classes of the English tests within Korean university entrance exams. English Education, 57(3), 303–331.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lam, H. P. (1993). Washback – Can it be qualified? A study on the impact of English examinations in Hong Kong. Unpublished master’s thesis, University of Leeds, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, E. (2005). A study of TOEIC results and college recruiting policy. English Language and Literature Teaching, 8(2), 55–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, X. (1990). How powerful can a language test be? The MET in China. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 11(5), 393–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madaus, G. F. (1988). The influence of testing on the curriculum. In N. Tanner (Ed.), Critical issues in curriculum: Eighty-seventh yearbook of the national society for the study of education (pp. 83–121). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McEwen, N. (1995). Educational accountability in Alberta. Canadian Journal of Education, 20, 27–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNamara, T. (1996). Measuring second language performance. London: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNamara, T. (2000). Language Testing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Messick, S. (1981). The controversy over coaching: Issues of effectiveness and equity. In B. F. Green (Ed.), New directions for testing and measurement: Issues in testing – Coaching, disclosure, and ethnic bias (pp. 21–55). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Messick, S. (1989). Validity. In R. L. Linn (Ed.), Educational measurement (3rd ed., pp. 13–103). New York: ACE and Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Messick, S. (1996). Validity and washback in language testing. Language Testing, 13, 241–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miles, M., & Huberman, A. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrow, K. (1986). The evaluation of tests of communicative performance. In M. Portal (Ed.), Innovations in language testing: Proceedings of the IUS/NFER conference (pp. 1–13). London: NFER/Nelson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newfields, T. (2005). TOEIC® washback effects on teachers: A pilot study at one university faculty. Toyo University Keizai Ronshu. Retrieved from http://www.tnewfields.info/Articles/washback.htm

  • Pan, Y. (2014). Learner washback variability in standardized exit tests. The Electronic Journal for English as a Second Language, 18(2), 1–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paris, S. G., Lawton, T. A., Turner, J. C., & Roth, J. L. (1991). A developmental perspective on standardized achievement testing. Educational Researcher, 20(5), 12–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, I. (1988). Tests as levers of change. In D. Chamberlain & R. J. Baumgardner (Eds.), ESP in the classroom: Practice and evaluation (pp. 98–107). London: Modern English.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peirce, B. N. (1992). Demystifying the TOEFL reading test. TESOL Quarterly, 26(4), 665–689.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Popham, W. J. (1987). The merits of measurement-driven instruction. Phi Delta Kappa, 68, 679–682.

    Google Scholar 

  • Qi, L. (2005). Stakeholders’ conflicting aims undermine the washback function of a high-stakes test. Language Testing, 22(2), 142–173. https://doi.org/10.1191/0265532205It300oa

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Read, J., & Hayes, B. (2003). The impact of the IELTS on preparation for academic study in New Zealand. IELTS International English Language Testing System Research Reports, 4, 153–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robb, T. N., & Ercanbrack, J. (1999). The study of the effect of direcet test preparation on the TOEIC scores of Japanese university students. TESLEJ. Retrieved from http://tesl-ej.org/ej12/a2.html

  • Roberts, M. (2002). TOEFL preparation: What are our Korean students doing and why? The Korea TESOL Journal, 5(1), 81–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saville, N., & Hawkey, R. (2004). The IELTS impact study: Investigating washback on teaching materials. In L. Cheng, Y. Watanabe, & A. Curtis (Eds.), Washback in language testing: Research contexts and methods (pp. 73–96). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepard, L. A. (1990). Inflated test score gains: Is the problem old norms or teaching the test. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 9, 15–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shih, C. M. (2007). A new washback model of students’ learning. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 64(1), 135–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shohamy, E. (1993). The power of test: The impact of language testing on teaching and learning. Washington, DC: National Foreign Language Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shohamy, E., Donitsa-Schmidt, S., & Ferman, I. (1996). Test impact revisited: Washback effect over time. Language Testing, 13, 298–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spolsky, B. (1994). The examination of classroom backwash cycle: Some historical cases. In D. Nunan, V. Berry, & R. Berry (Eds.), Bringing about change in language education (pp. 55–66). Hong Kong: Hong Kong, Dept. of Curriculum Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spratt, M. (2005). Washback and the classroom: The implications for teaching and learning of studies of washback from exams. Language Teaching Research, 9(1), 5–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomson, S. (2012). The effects of TOEIC education in South Korean universities. Unpublished masters’ thesis, Birmingham University, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsagari, D. (2007). Review of washback in language testing: How has been done? What more needs doing? Unpublished manuscript, Lancaster University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wall, D. (1996). Introducing new tests into traditional systems: Insights from general education and from innovation theory. Language Testing, 13, 334–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wall, D. (1997). Impact and washback in language testing. In C. Clapman & D. Corson (Eds.), Encyclopaedia of language and education: Vol. 7. Language testing and assessment (pp. 291–302). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wall, D. (2000). The impact of high-stakes testing on teaching and learning: Can this be predicted or controlled? System, 28, 499–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wall, D., & Horak, T. (2006). The impact of changes in the TOEFL examination on teaching and learning in central and Eastern Europe: Phase 1, the baseline study. Princeton: Educational Testing Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watanabe, Y. (1992). Washback effects of college entrance examination on language learning strategies. JACET, 23, 175–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watanabe, Y. (2001). Does the university entrance examination motivate learners? A case study of learner interviews. InTrans-equator exchanges: A collection of academic papers in honour of Professor David Ingram (Vol. 100–110). Akita: Faculty of Education and Human Studies, Akita University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watanabe, Y. (2004). Methodology in washback studies. In L. Cheng, Y. Watanabe, & A. Curtis (Eds.), Washback in language testing: Research contexts and methods (pp. 19–36). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weir, C. J. (1990). Communicative language testing. Hemel Hempstead: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wesdorp, H. (1982). Backwash effects of language-testing in primary and secondary education. Journal of Applied Language Study, 1, 40–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiseman, S. (Ed.). (1961). Examinations and English education. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woo, K. M. (2001). Washback on high school classrooms of the English tests within Korean university entrance exams. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Teachers College, Columbia University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xie, Q. (2010). Test design and use, preparation, and performance : A structural equation modelling study of consequential validity. Thesis, University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong SAR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xie, Q. (2013). Do test design and uses influence test preparation? Testing a model of washback with structural equation modelling. Language Testing, 30, 49–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Auckland, New Zealand

    Dawn Karen Booth

Authors
  1. Dawn Karen Booth
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Booth, D.K. (2018). Washback. In: The Sociocultural Activity of High Stakes Standardised Language Testing. English Language Education, vol 12. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70446-3_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70446-3_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-70445-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-70446-3

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation