Advertisement

Ubuntu and the Communication–Power Nexus

  • Leyla Tavernaro-Haidarian
Chapter

Abstract

Against the backdrop of a global refugee crisis, an ever-increasing gap between rich and poor and dismal environmental forecasts, the headlines that dominate contemporary news reports are often characterized by division and polarization, as “fear”, “conspiracy” and “paranoia” (see Munusamy, 2017, n.p.) beset the public. “The problem”, some say, “is no longer simply paralyzing partisanship. The danger at the moment is … a kind of tribalism”, and such divides aren’t simply between left and right: “Instead, there are schisms within the parties, and in some cases schisms within schisms” (Seib, 2017, n.p.). These divisive tendencies are in some ways reflected and amplified by the media who, in turn, reduce what are essentially complex interrelated issues into over-simplified frames that boost ratings and make the consumption of information easier. Political debates, talk shows and many other forms of public discourse, even those that resist a commercial focus in favour of an ethos of public journalism, are frequently characterized by agonistic modes of communication that posit and challenge, persuade and argue, betraying deeply conflictual assumptions around the way in which we perceive human relations.

References

  1. Amos, V., & Parmar, P. (1984). Challenging imperial feminism. Feminist Review, 17(1), 3–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arendt, H. (1969). On violence. San Diego, CA: Harvest.Google Scholar
  3. Blankenberg, N. (1999). In search of real freedom: Ubuntu and the media. Critical Arts, 12(2), 42–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Blau, P. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  5. Boulding, K. E. (1990). Three faces of power. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  6. Bourdieu, P. (1994). Structures, habitus, power: Basis for a theory of symbolic power. In N. B. Dirks, G. Eley, & S. B. Orthner (Eds.), Culture, power, history: A reader in contemporary social theory. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Brocke-Utne, B. (1989). Feminist perspectives on peace and peace education. New York: Pergamon.Google Scholar
  8. Chasi, C. (2014a). Violent communication is not alien to Ubuntu: Nothing human is alien to Africans. Communication: South African Journal for Communication Theory and Research, 40(4), 287–304.Google Scholar
  9. Chasi, C. (2014b). Ubuntu and freedom of expression. Ethics & Behavior, 24(6), 495–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Christians, C. G. (2004). Ubuntu and communitarianism in media ethics. Ecquid Novi, 25(2), 235–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Collins, P. H. (1990). Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment. Boston, MA: Unwin Hyman.Google Scholar
  12. Connolly, W. (1974). The terms of political discourse. Lexington, MA: Heath.Google Scholar
  13. Crenshaw, K. (2015). On intersectionality: The essential writings of Kimberle Crenshaw. New York: The New Press.Google Scholar
  14. Dahlgren, P., & Sparks, C. (1992). Journalism and popular culture. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  15. Dowding, K. (1996). Power. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Duncan, J., & Seloane, M. (1998). Introduction. In J. Duncan & M. Seloane (Eds.), Media and democracy in South Africa (pp. 1–53). Pretoria: HSRC.Google Scholar
  17. Edelman, M. (1988). Constructing the political spectacle. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  18. Ess, C. (2013). Digital media ethics. Oxford: Polity.Google Scholar
  19. Filson, G. (1992). Cooperative inquiry as a theory of practice: Contributions of John Dewey and Jurgen Habermas (Doctoral Dissertation). Toronto: University of Toronto.Google Scholar
  20. Foucault, M. (1980). Power/knowledge. Brighton: Harvester.Google Scholar
  21. Fourie, P. (2011). Normative media theory in a changed media landscape and globalized society. In N. Hyde-Clarke (Ed.), Communication and media ethics in South Africa (pp. 25–45). Cape Town: Juta.Google Scholar
  22. Gamson, W. (1968). Power and discontent. Homewood: Dorsey.Google Scholar
  23. Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  24. Goldschlager, A. (1982). Towards a semiotics of authoritarian discourse. Poetics Today, 3(1), 11–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Habermas, J. (1962). The structural transformation of the public sphere. Boston, MA: MIT.Google Scholar
  26. Hartsock, N. (1983). Money, sex and power: Towards a feminist historical materialism. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
  27. Hobbes, T. (1968). Leviathan. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.Google Scholar
  28. Karlberg, M. (2002). Partisan branding and media spectacle: Implications for democratic communication. Democratic Communique, 18, 1–21.Google Scholar
  29. Karlberg, M. (2004). Beyond the culture of contest. Oxford: George Ronald.Google Scholar
  30. Karlberg, M. (2005). The power of discourse and the discourse of power: Pursuing peace through discourse intervention. International Journal of Peace Studies, 10(1), 1–25.Google Scholar
  31. Lorde, A. (1984). Age, race, class and sex: Women redefining difference. Berkeley, CA: Crossing.Google Scholar
  32. Louw, D. J. (2001). Ubuntu and the challenge of multiculturalism in post-apartheid South Africa. Unitwin Student Network. Retrieved November 4, 2014, from http://www.phys.uu.nl/unitwin/
  33. Louw, D. J. (2010, January). Power sharing and the challenge of ubuntu ethics. Paper presented at the Forum for Religious Dialogue Symposium of the Research Institute for Theology and Religion at the University of South Africa, Pretoria, South Africa.Google Scholar
  34. Lukes, S. (1986). Power. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Machiavelli, N. (1961). The Prince. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  36. Macpherson, C. B. (1973). Democratic theory: Essays in retrieval. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Marx, K., & Engels, F. (1967). The German ideology. London: Lawrence & Wishart.Google Scholar
  38. Metz, T. (2011). Ubuntu as a moral theory and human rights in South Africa. African Human Rights Law Journal, 11(1), 532–559.Google Scholar
  39. Metz, T. (2014). Harmonizing global ethics in the future: A proposal to add South and East to West. Journal of Global Ethics, 10(2), 146–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Metz, T. (2015). African ethics and journalism ethics: News and opinion in light of Ubuntu. Journal of Media Ethics: Exploring Questions of Media Morality, 30(2), 74–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Metz, T., & Gaie, J. (2010). The African ethic of Ubuntu/Botho: Implications for research on morality. Journal of Moral Education, 39(1), 273–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Miller, J. B. (1982). Colloquium: Women and power. Stone Center for Developmental Services and Studies, 82(1), 1–5.Google Scholar
  43. Mkhize, N. (2008). Ubuntu and harmony: An African approach to morality and ethics. In R. Nicolson (Ed.), Persons in community: African ethics in a global culture (pp. 35–44). Pietermaritzburg: University of KwaZulu-Natal Press.Google Scholar
  44. Mnyaka, M., & Motlhabi, M. (2005). The African concept of Ubuntu/Botho and its socio-moral significance. Black Theology, 3(1), 215–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Mnyaka, M., & Motlhabi, M. (2009). Ubuntu and its socio-moral significance. In M. F. Murove (Ed.), African ethics: An anthology of comparative and applied ethics (pp. 63–84). Pietermaritzburg: University of Kwazulu Natal Press.Google Scholar
  46. Moulton, J. (1983). A paradigm of philosophy: The adversary method. In S. Harding & M. Hintikka (Eds.), Discovering reality: Feminist perspectives on epistemology, metaphysics, methodology, and philosophy of science. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  47. Mupotsa, D. (2015, October 7). Interview with author. Johannesburg.Google Scholar
  48. Nussbaum, M. (2011). Creating capabilities: The human development approach. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Parmar, P. (1990). The politics of articulation in identity: Community, culture, difference. London: Lawrence & Wishart.Google Scholar
  50. Rao, S., & Wasserman, H. (2007). Global media ethics revisited: A postcolonial critique. Global Media and Communication, 3(1), 29–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Rodny-Gumede, Y. (2015a). An assessment of the public interest and ideas of the public in South Africa and the adoption of Ubuntu journalism. Journal of Mass Media Ethics, 30(2), 109–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Rodny-Gumede, Y. (2015b). Coverage of Marikana: War and conflict and the case for peace (journalism). Social Dynamics, 41(2), 359–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Shutte, A. (1993). Philosophy for Africa. Cape Town: University of Cape Town Press.Google Scholar
  54. Seib, G. F. (2017). A new tribalism spreads in Donald Trump’s Washington. The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved April 3, 2017, from https://www.wsj.com/articles/a-new-tribalism-spreads-in-donald-trumps-washington-1491229525
  55. Tannen, D. (1998). The argument culture. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  56. Tavernaro-Haidarian, L. (2017). Talking Ubuntu: Toward a relational talk show model (Doctoral Thesis). Johannesburg: The University of Johannesburg.Google Scholar
  57. Tomaselli, K. G. (2011). (Afri)ethics, communitarianism and the public sphere. In N. Hyde-Clarke (Ed.), Communication and media ethics in South Africa. Cape Town: Juta.Google Scholar
  58. Trompkins, J. (1988). Fighting words: Unlearning to write the critical essay. The Georgia Review, 42, 585–590.Google Scholar
  59. Tutu, D. (1999). No future without forgiveness. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  60. Van Hensbroek, B. (1999). Political discourses in African thought: 1960 to the present. Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
  61. Wartenberg, T. E. (1990). The forms of power: From domination to transformation. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  62. Wasserman, H. (2013). Journalism in a new democracy: The ethics of listening. Communicatio: South African Journal for Communication Theory and Research, 39(1), 67–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Weber, M. (1986). Domination by economic power and by authority. In S. Lukes (Ed.), Power. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  64. Weimann, G. (2000). Communicating unreality: Modern media and the reconstruction of reality. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  65. Wiredu, K. (1996). Cultural universals and particulars: An African perspective. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  66. Wrong, D. H. (1968). Some problems in defining social power. American Journal of Sociology, 73(6), 673–681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Leyla Tavernaro-Haidarian
    • 1
  1. 1.GES Postdoctoral Research FellowUniversity of JohannesburgJohannesburgSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations