Skip to main content

Balance of World-Systems and Neoempire

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Grand Strategies of Weak States and Great Powers
  • 399 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter continues to illustrate the intersect of great and weak power grand strategies by submitting a new concept to the field of international relations: neoempire. Neoempire indicates the development of a new political unit that seeks to unite weak states under the banner of a great power. Led by a network of elites across involved states, neoempire signifies a shift from focus on states to consider new systemically creative actors that organize states into coherent economic and political blocs. These units organize production and trade into competing world-systems. World-systems theory provides an interesting lens to analyze state activity into this interesting new grouping.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ambrose, S., & Brinkley, D. (1997). Rise to Globalism: American Foreign Policy Since 1938. New York: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amin, S. (1992). 1492. Monthly Review, 44(3), 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chase-Dunn, C. (2013). Five Linked Crises in the Contemporary World-System. World-Systems Research, 19(2), 175–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, B. (2008). International Political Economy: An Intellectual History. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dos Santos, T. (1970). The Structure of Dependence. American Economic Review, 60(21), 231–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Easter, C. (1999). Small States Development: A Commonwealth Vulnerability Index. Round Table, 351, 403–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The Economist. (2016, April 16). A Despot’s Guide to Foreign Aid. The Economist. Retrieved from http://www.economist.com/news/middle-east-and-africa/21697001-want-more-cash-vote-china-united-nations-despots-guide-foreign

  • Frank, A. G. (1966). The Development of Underdevelopment. Monthly Review, 18(4), 17–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaddis, J. (1997). Cold War Empires: Europe. In We Now Know. Gloucestershire: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gates, H., & Appiah, K. (2010). Scramble for Africa. In Encyclopedia of Africa. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gilens, M. (2012). Affluence and Influence: Economic Inequality and Political Power in America. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilens, M., & Page, B. (2014). Testing Theories of American Politics: Elites, Interest Groups and Average Citizens. Perspectives on Politics, 12(3), 564–581.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilpin, R. (1975). US Power and the Multinational Corporation: The Political Economy of Foreign Direct Investment. New York: Basic Books Inc.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gilpin, R. (1987). The Political Economy of International Relations. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gilpin, R. (1988). The Theory of Hegemonic War. The Journal of Interdisciplinary History, 18(4), 591–613.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, A., & Jones, B. (2010). How Do Rising Powers Rise? Survival, 52(6), 63–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hasen, R. (2016). Plutocrats United: Campaign Money, the Supreme Court, and the Distortion of American Elections. New Haven: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herz, J. (1950). Idealist Internationalism and the Security Dilemma. World Politics, 2, 157–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hobson, J. (2005). Imperialism: A Study. New York: Cosimo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isajiw, W. (1968). Causation and Functionalism in Sociology. New York: Schocken Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, L., & Rossem, R. (2016). The Rising Powers and Globalization: Structural Change to the Global System Between 1965 and 2005. Journal of World-Systems Research, 22(2), 373–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • James, P., & Nairn, T. (2006). Globalizing Empires: A Critical Introduction. In P. James & T. Nairn (Eds.), Globalization and Violence. London: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kassab, H. S. (2015a). Reconceptualizing Security Priorities of the Hemisphere. In B. M. Bagley, J. D. Rosen, & H. S. Kassab (Eds.), Reconceptualizing Security in the Americas in the Twenty-First Century. Lanham: Lexington Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kassab, H. S. (2015b). Weak States in International Relations Theory: The Cases of Armenia, St. Kitts and Nevis, Lebanon and Cambodia. New York: Palgrave.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kassab, H. S. (2017). Prioritization Theory and Defensive Foreign Policy: Systemic Vulnerabilities in International Politics. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kennan, G. (1946). The Long Telegram. Retrieved from http://nsarchive.gwu.edu/coldwar/documents/episode-1/kennan.htm

  • Kennedy, P. (1987). The Rise and Fall of Great Powers: Economic Change and Military Conflict from 1500 to 2000. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keohane, R., & Nye, J. (2011). Power and Interdependance. In Longman Classics in Political Science (4th ed.). Glenview, IL: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kindleberger, C. P. (1973). The World in Depression, 1929–1939 (Vol. 4). Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Komsoly, A. (2016). Prospects of Decline and Hegemonic Shifts for the West. Journal of World Systems Research, 22(2), 463–483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krasner, S. (1983). International Regimes. Cornell: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenin, V. I. (1939). Imperialism: The Highest Stage of Capitalism. New York: International Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K. (1970). Contribution to Critique of Political Economy. In C. J. Arthur (Ed.), Capital: Student Edition. London: Lawrence and Wishart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, J. (2016). Dark Money: The Hidden History of the Billionaires Behind the Rise of the Radical Right. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naim, M. (2007). Rogue Aid. Foreign Policy. Retrieved July 20, 2013, from http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2007/02/14/rogue_aid

  • Ortiz, J. (2012). DÉJÁ VU: Latin America and Its New Trade Dependency … This Time with China. Latin American Research Review, 47(3), 175–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singer, H. W. (1949). Economic Progress in Underdeveloped Countries. Social Research, 16(1), 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, J. (2013). The Price of Inequality. New York: W.W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Viner, J. (1958). The Long View and the Short: Studies in Economic Theory and Policy. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallerstein, I. (1974). The Modern World-System: Capitalist Agriculture and the Origins of the European World-Economy in the Sixteenth Century. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallerstein, I. (1984). Patterns and Prospectives of the Capitalist World-Economy. Social Justice/Global Options/Contemporary Marxism, 9, 59–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallerstein, I. (2005). After Developmentalism and Globalization, What? Social Forces, 83(3), 1263–1278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waltz, K. (2010). Theory of International Relations. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, J. (2004). A Short History of the Washington Consensus. Barcelona: Fundacion CIDOB.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woods, N. (2008). Whose Aid? Whose Influence? China, Emerging Donors and the Silent Revolution in Development Assistance. International Affairs, 84(6), 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Kassab, H.S. (2018). Balance of World-Systems and Neoempire. In: Grand Strategies of Weak States and Great Powers. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70404-3_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics