Skip to main content
  • 207 Accesses

Abstract

The conclusion ties together the major themes and arguments of this book. It suggests that the army largely failed in its task as a tool of nation-building, despite its seeming unity of action throughout the Great War. Projecting forward to the interwar years, however, it is clear that many of the social issues that dominated the nineteenth century civil–military debate emerged once more, and, in the case of the Flemish movement, developed apace. As such, this chapter contends that party-politics and local interests were largely to blame for the army’s ultimate failure to develop a corporate sense of nationalism as well as adequately prepare for war. Belgium’s antimilitarism proved a difficult ‘nut to crack’ and was only just evolving into patriotism among the bourgeoisie by 1914.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    E. Witte, La Construction de la Belgique, 1828–1847 (Éditions Complexe, Brussels, 2005), pp. 41–42.

  2. 2.

    B. De Wever, ‘The case of the Dutch-speaking Belgians in the nineteenth century’, in P. Broomans et al. (eds.), The Beloved Mothertongue: Ethnolinguisticn Nationalism in Small Nations: Inventories and Reflections (Peeters, Leuven, Paris & Dudley, MA, 2008), pp. 55–56.

  3. 3.

    R. Boijen, ‘Het Leger als Smeltkroes van de Natie?’, Bijdragen tot de Eigentijdse Geschiedenis, no. 3 (1997), pp. 55–70.

  4. 4.

    See D. Stevenson, ‘Belgium, Luxembourg, and the Defence of Western Europe, 1914–1920’, International History Review, vol. 4, no. 4 (1982), pp. 504–522.

  5. 5.

    A. Crahay, L’Armée Belge Entre les Deux Guerres (L. Musin, Brussels, 1978), pp. 88 and 138–141.

  6. 6.

    É. Wanty, ‘Le milieu militaire belge 1830–1945’, in Actes du Colloque d’Histoire Militaire Belge (1830–1980)/Akten van het Colloquium over de Belgische Krijgsgeschiedenis (1830–1980) (Musée Royal de l’Armée/Koninklijk Legersmuseum, Brussels, 1981), pp. 399–400, 26–28 March 1980.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Draper, M. (2018). Conclusion. In: The Belgian Army and Society from Independence to the Great War. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70386-2_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70386-2_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-70385-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-70386-2

  • eBook Packages: HistoryHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics