Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Refractions

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Interactive Media for Sustainability

  • 771 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter discusses sustainability first as a “contested concept” and then as a discursive field. Based on the accounts given in previous chapters, the four refracted meanings of sustainability are critically evaluated based on three elements: complexity, futurity, and agency. Complexity because sustainability involves a dense network of human and nonhuman actors, material and cultural imperatives whose interactions often lead to unanticipated, emergent consequences. Futurity because from its very beginning, sustainability sought to shift human temporal horizons, considerations, and responsibilities from the “here and now” to the future. And agency because sustainability implies that humans have the capacity to intervene and make the world a better place.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    “It doesn’t say much about how to get there and it doesn’t say how we will ever know that we are indeed there” (Ehrenfeld 2008, pp. 53–54).

  2. 2.

    Riley (2017, July 10).

Bibliography

  • Bendor, R. (2018a). Interaction Design for Sustainability Futures: Towards Worldmaking Interactions. In M. Hazas & L. P. Nathan (Eds.), Digital Technology and Sustainability: Engaging the Paradox (pp. 205–216). New York: Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bendor, R. (2018b). Sustainability, Hope and Designerly Action in the Anthropocene. Interactions, 25(3), 82–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1966/1989). The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. New York: Anchor Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergson, H. (2007). The Creative Mind: An Introduction to Metaphysics (trans: Andison, M. L.). Mineola: Dover Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brulle, R. J. (2010). From Environmental Campaigns to Advancing the Public Dialog: Environmental Communication for Civic Engagement. Environmental Communication, 4(1), 82–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Callon, M., Lascoumes, P., & Barthe, Y. (2009). Acting in an Uncertain World: An Essay on Technical Democracy (trans: Burchell, G.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canales, J. (2015). The Physicist and the Philosopher: Einstein, Bergson, and the Debate That Changed Our Understanding of Time. Princeton/Oxford: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Candy, S. (2010). The Futures of Everyday Life: Politics and the Design of Experiential Scenarios. PhD dissertation submitted at the University of Hawaii, Manoa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caradonna, J. L. (2014). Sustainability: A History. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connelly, S. (2007). Mapping Sustainable Development as a Contested Concept. Local Environment: The International Journal of Justice and Sustainability, 12(3), 259–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Couldry, N., & Hepp, A. (2017). The Mediated Construction of Reality. Cambridge/Malden: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daly, H. E. (1993). Sustainable Growth: An Impossibility Theorem. In H. E. Daly & K. N. Townsend (Eds.), Valuing the Earth: Economics, Ecology, Ethics (pp. 267–273). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987). A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia (trans: Massumi, B.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1994). What Is Philosophy? (trans: Tomlinson, H., & Burchell, G.). New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dourish, P. (2010). HCI and Environmental Sustainability: The Politics of Design and the Design of Politics. In O. W. Bartelsen & P. Krogh (Eds.), Proceedings of DIS 2010 (pp. 1–10). New York: ACM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dryzek, J. S. (2013). The Politics of the Earth: Environmental Discourses (3rd ed.). Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrenfeld, J. (2008). Sustainability by Design: A Subversive Strategy for Transforming Our Consumer Culture. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feenberg, A. (2017). Technosystem: The Social Life of Reason. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fogg, B. J. (2003). Persuasive Technology: Using Computers to Change What We Think and Do. Amsterdam/Boston: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Funtowicz, S. O., & Ravetz, J. R. (1993). Science for the Post-Normal Age. Futures, 25(7), 739–755.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P., & Trow, M. (1994). The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorz, A. (2012). Capitalism, Socialism, Ecology (trans: Chalmers, M.). London/New York: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grober, U. (2012). Sustainability: A Cultural History (trans: Cunningham, R.). Totnes: Green Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossberg, L. (1992). We Gotta Get Out of This Place: Popular Conservatism and Postmodern Culture. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hacking, I. (1999). The Social Construction of What? Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hulme, M. (2009). Why We Disagree About Climate Change: Understanding Controversy, Inaction and Opportunity. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, M. (1999). Sustainable Development as a Contested Concept. In A. Dobson (Ed.), Fairness and Futurity: Essays on Environmental Sustainability and Social Justice (pp. 21–45). Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kittler, F. (2017). Real Time Analysis, Time Axis Manipulation. Cultural Politics, 13(1), 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kollmuss, A., & Agyeman, J. (2002). Mind the Gap: Why Do People Act Environmentally and What Are the Barriers to Pro-environmental Behavior? Environmental Education Research, 8(3), 239–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krämer, S. (2006). The Cultural Techniques of Time Axis Manipulation: On Friedrich Kittler’s Conception of Media. Theory, Culture & Society, 23(7–8), 93–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lukacs, M. (2017, July 17). Neoliberalism Has Conned Us into Fighting Climate Change as Individuals. The Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/environment/true-north/2017/jul/17/neoliberalism-has-conned-us-into-fighting-climate-change-as-individuals

  • Maggs, D. (2014). Artists of the Floating World. PhD dissertation submitted at the University of British Columbia, Vancouver.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maggs, D., & Robinson, J. (2016). Recalibrating the Anthropocene: Sustainability in an Imaginary World. Environmental Philosophy, 13(2), 175–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, J. D., & Toffel, M. W. (2005). Framing the Elusive Concept of Sustainability: A Sustainability Hierarchy. Environmental Science and Technology, 39(3), 673–682.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merleau-Ponty, M. (1962). Phenomenology of Perception (trans: Smith, C.). London/Henley: Routledge/Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, T. R. (2013). Constructing Sustainability Science: Emerging Perspectives and Research Trajectories. Sustainability Science, 8(2), 279–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mittler, D. (2001). Hijacking Sustainability? Planners and the Promise and Failure of Local Agenda 21. In A. Layard, S. Davoudi, & S. Batty (Eds.), Planning for a Sustainable Future (pp. 53–60). London/New York: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nardi, B., Tomlinson, B., Patterson, D., Chen, J., Pargman, D., Raghavan, B., & Penzenstadler, B. (forthcoming). Computing Within Limits. Communications of the ACM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parr, A. (2009). Hijacking Sustainability. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riley, T. (2017, July 10). Just 100 Companies Responsible for 71% of Global Emissions, Study Says. The Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/sustainable-business/2017/jul/10/100-fossil-fuel-companies-investors-responsible-71-global-emissions-cdp-study-climate-change

  • Robinson, J. (2004). Squaring the Circle? Some Thoughts on the Idea of Sustainable Development. Ecological Economics, 48, 369–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rockström, J., & Klum, M. (2015). Big World, Small Planet: Abundance Within Planetary Boundaries. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rockström, J., Steffen, W., Noone, K., Persson, Å., Chapin, F. S., III, Lambin, E. F., et al. (2009). A Safe Operating Space for Humanity. Nature, 461, 472–475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheppard, S. R. J. (2005). Landscape Visualisation and Climate Change: The Potential for Influencing Perceptions and Behaviour. Environmental Science and Policy, 8, 637–654.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F. (1971). Beyond Freedom and Dignity. Indianapolis/Cambridge: Hackett.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solnit, R. (2016). Hope in the Dark: Untold Histories, Wild Possibilities (3rd ed.). Chicago: Haymarket Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stagoll, C. (2005). Concepts. In A. Parr (Ed.), The Deleuze Dictionary (pp. 50–51). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suzuki, D. T. (2007). The Sacred Balance: Rediscovering Our Place in Nature (3rd ed.). Vancouver: David Suzuki Foundation/Greystone Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, C. (2004). Modern Social Imaginaries. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomlinson, B. (2010). Greening Through IT: Information Technology for Environmental Sustainability. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • UN. (2015). Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Retrieved from https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/21252030%20Agenda%20for%20Sustainable%20Development%20web.pdf

  • UNWCED. (1987). Our Common Future: Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vervoort, J. M., Bendor, R., Kelliher, A., Strik, O., & Helfgott, A. E. R. (2015). Scenarios and the Art of Worldmaking. Futures, 74, 62–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, G. (2011, September 7). Going Green But Getting Nowhere. New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/08/opinion/going-green-but-getting-nowhere.html

  • Wittgenstein, L. (2001). Philosophical Investigations (trans: Anscombe, G. E. M., 3rd ed.). Oxford/Malden: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands

    Roy Bendor

Authors
  1. Roy Bendor
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Bendor, R. (2018). Refractions. In: Interactive Media for Sustainability. Palgrave Studies in Media and Environmental Communication. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70383-1_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation