Abstract
This chapter discusses sustainability first as a “contested concept” and then as a discursive field. Based on the accounts given in previous chapters, the four refracted meanings of sustainability are critically evaluated based on three elements: complexity, futurity, and agency. Complexity because sustainability involves a dense network of human and nonhuman actors, material and cultural imperatives whose interactions often lead to unanticipated, emergent consequences. Futurity because from its very beginning, sustainability sought to shift human temporal horizons, considerations, and responsibilities from the “here and now” to the future. And agency because sustainability implies that humans have the capacity to intervene and make the world a better place.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Bibliography
Bendor, R. (2018a). Interaction Design for Sustainability Futures: Towards Worldmaking Interactions. In M. Hazas & L. P. Nathan (Eds.), Digital Technology and Sustainability: Engaging the Paradox (pp. 205–216). New York: Routledge.
Bendor, R. (2018b). Sustainability, Hope and Designerly Action in the Anthropocene. Interactions, 25(3), 82–84.
Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1966/1989). The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. New York: Anchor Books.
Bergson, H. (2007). The Creative Mind: An Introduction to Metaphysics (trans: Andison, M. L.). Mineola: Dover Publications.
Brulle, R. J. (2010). From Environmental Campaigns to Advancing the Public Dialog: Environmental Communication for Civic Engagement. Environmental Communication, 4(1), 82–98.
Callon, M., Lascoumes, P., & Barthe, Y. (2009). Acting in an Uncertain World: An Essay on Technical Democracy (trans: Burchell, G.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Canales, J. (2015). The Physicist and the Philosopher: Einstein, Bergson, and the Debate That Changed Our Understanding of Time. Princeton/Oxford: Princeton University Press.
Candy, S. (2010). The Futures of Everyday Life: Politics and the Design of Experiential Scenarios. PhD dissertation submitted at the University of Hawaii, Manoa.
Caradonna, J. L. (2014). Sustainability: A History. New York: Oxford University Press.
Connelly, S. (2007). Mapping Sustainable Development as a Contested Concept. Local Environment: The International Journal of Justice and Sustainability, 12(3), 259–278.
Couldry, N., & Hepp, A. (2017). The Mediated Construction of Reality. Cambridge/Malden: Polity Press.
Daly, H. E. (1993). Sustainable Growth: An Impossibility Theorem. In H. E. Daly & K. N. Townsend (Eds.), Valuing the Earth: Economics, Ecology, Ethics (pp. 267–273). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987). A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia (trans: Massumi, B.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1994). What Is Philosophy? (trans: Tomlinson, H., & Burchell, G.). New York: Columbia University Press.
Dourish, P. (2010). HCI and Environmental Sustainability: The Politics of Design and the Design of Politics. In O. W. Bartelsen & P. Krogh (Eds.), Proceedings of DIS 2010 (pp. 1–10). New York: ACM.
Dryzek, J. S. (2013). The Politics of the Earth: Environmental Discourses (3rd ed.). Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.
Ehrenfeld, J. (2008). Sustainability by Design: A Subversive Strategy for Transforming Our Consumer Culture. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Feenberg, A. (2017). Technosystem: The Social Life of Reason. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Fogg, B. J. (2003). Persuasive Technology: Using Computers to Change What We Think and Do. Amsterdam/Boston: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.
Funtowicz, S. O., & Ravetz, J. R. (1993). Science for the Post-Normal Age. Futures, 25(7), 739–755.
Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P., & Trow, M. (1994). The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies. London: Sage.
Gorz, A. (2012). Capitalism, Socialism, Ecology (trans: Chalmers, M.). London/New York: Verso.
Grober, U. (2012). Sustainability: A Cultural History (trans: Cunningham, R.). Totnes: Green Books.
Grossberg, L. (1992). We Gotta Get Out of This Place: Popular Conservatism and Postmodern Culture. New York: Routledge.
Hacking, I. (1999). The Social Construction of What? Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Hulme, M. (2009). Why We Disagree About Climate Change: Understanding Controversy, Inaction and Opportunity. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.
Jacobs, M. (1999). Sustainable Development as a Contested Concept. In A. Dobson (Ed.), Fairness and Futurity: Essays on Environmental Sustainability and Social Justice (pp. 21–45). Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.
Kittler, F. (2017). Real Time Analysis, Time Axis Manipulation. Cultural Politics, 13(1), 1–18.
Kollmuss, A., & Agyeman, J. (2002). Mind the Gap: Why Do People Act Environmentally and What Are the Barriers to Pro-environmental Behavior? Environmental Education Research, 8(3), 239–260.
Krämer, S. (2006). The Cultural Techniques of Time Axis Manipulation: On Friedrich Kittler’s Conception of Media. Theory, Culture & Society, 23(7–8), 93–109.
Lukacs, M. (2017, July 17). Neoliberalism Has Conned Us into Fighting Climate Change as Individuals. The Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/environment/true-north/2017/jul/17/neoliberalism-has-conned-us-into-fighting-climate-change-as-individuals
Maggs, D. (2014). Artists of the Floating World. PhD dissertation submitted at the University of British Columbia, Vancouver.
Maggs, D., & Robinson, J. (2016). Recalibrating the Anthropocene: Sustainability in an Imaginary World. Environmental Philosophy, 13(2), 175–194.
Marshall, J. D., & Toffel, M. W. (2005). Framing the Elusive Concept of Sustainability: A Sustainability Hierarchy. Environmental Science and Technology, 39(3), 673–682.
Merleau-Ponty, M. (1962). Phenomenology of Perception (trans: Smith, C.). London/Henley: Routledge/Kegan Paul.
Miller, T. R. (2013). Constructing Sustainability Science: Emerging Perspectives and Research Trajectories. Sustainability Science, 8(2), 279–293.
Mittler, D. (2001). Hijacking Sustainability? Planners and the Promise and Failure of Local Agenda 21. In A. Layard, S. Davoudi, & S. Batty (Eds.), Planning for a Sustainable Future (pp. 53–60). London/New York: Taylor & Francis.
Nardi, B., Tomlinson, B., Patterson, D., Chen, J., Pargman, D., Raghavan, B., & Penzenstadler, B. (forthcoming). Computing Within Limits. Communications of the ACM.
Parr, A. (2009). Hijacking Sustainability. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Riley, T. (2017, July 10). Just 100 Companies Responsible for 71% of Global Emissions, Study Says. The Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/sustainable-business/2017/jul/10/100-fossil-fuel-companies-investors-responsible-71-global-emissions-cdp-study-climate-change
Robinson, J. (2004). Squaring the Circle? Some Thoughts on the Idea of Sustainable Development. Ecological Economics, 48, 369–384.
Rockström, J., & Klum, M. (2015). Big World, Small Planet: Abundance Within Planetary Boundaries. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Rockström, J., Steffen, W., Noone, K., Persson, Å., Chapin, F. S., III, Lambin, E. F., et al. (2009). A Safe Operating Space for Humanity. Nature, 461, 472–475.
Sheppard, S. R. J. (2005). Landscape Visualisation and Climate Change: The Potential for Influencing Perceptions and Behaviour. Environmental Science and Policy, 8, 637–654.
Skinner, B. F. (1971). Beyond Freedom and Dignity. Indianapolis/Cambridge: Hackett.
Solnit, R. (2016). Hope in the Dark: Untold Histories, Wild Possibilities (3rd ed.). Chicago: Haymarket Books.
Stagoll, C. (2005). Concepts. In A. Parr (Ed.), The Deleuze Dictionary (pp. 50–51). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Suzuki, D. T. (2007). The Sacred Balance: Rediscovering Our Place in Nature (3rd ed.). Vancouver: David Suzuki Foundation/Greystone Books.
Taylor, C. (2004). Modern Social Imaginaries. Durham: Duke University Press.
Tomlinson, B. (2010). Greening Through IT: Information Technology for Environmental Sustainability. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
UN. (2015). Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Retrieved from https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/21252030%20Agenda%20for%20Sustainable%20Development%20web.pdf
UNWCED. (1987). Our Common Future: Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development. New York: Oxford University Press.
Vervoort, J. M., Bendor, R., Kelliher, A., Strik, O., & Helfgott, A. E. R. (2015). Scenarios and the Art of Worldmaking. Futures, 74, 62–70.
Wagner, G. (2011, September 7). Going Green But Getting Nowhere. New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/08/opinion/going-green-but-getting-nowhere.html
Wittgenstein, L. (2001). Philosophical Investigations (trans: Anscombe, G. E. M., 3rd ed.). Oxford/Malden: Blackwell.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bendor, R. (2018). Refractions. In: Interactive Media for Sustainability. Palgrave Studies in Media and Environmental Communication. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70383-1_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70383-1_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-70382-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-70383-1
eBook Packages: Literature, Cultural and Media StudiesLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)