Between Risks and Opportunities: Social Policies in Contemporary Turkey

  • Mehmet Fatih Aysan
Chapter

Abstract

This study analyses Turkish social policies in the 2000s in relation to welfare regime discussions in the literature. Unlike many OECD countries where social policy expenditures have been cut back, Turkey has experienced significant improvements both in social expenditures and the quality of social provisions. Based on a nation-wide empirical investigation, this study aims to understand the effects of various welfare players, particularly social policy institutions, on welfare distribution and citizens’ welfare perceptions and satisfaction levels. This paper claims that although important improvements have been made toward achieving a sustainable social policy strategy in the 2000s, a new social policy strategy is needed to establish a sustainable welfare regime in Turkey.

Keywords

Sociology of economics Government expenditures and welfare programs General Welfare, Well-Being Provision and effects of welfare programs Demographic trends 

JEL Codes

A14 H53 I31 I38 J11 

References

  1. Agartan, Tuba I. 2012. Marketization and Universalism: Crafting the Right Balance in the Turkish Health Care System. Current Sociology 60 (4): 456–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Atun, Rifat, Sabahattin Aydin, Sarbani Chakraborty, Safir Sumer, Meltem Aran, Ipek Gurol, Serpil Nazlioglu, Senay Ozgulcu, Ulger Aydogan, Banu Ayar, Ugur Dilmen, and Recep Akdag. 2013. Universal Health Coverage in Turkey: Enhancement of Equity. The Lancet 382 (9886): 65–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aybars, Ayse I., and Dimitris Tsarouhas. 2010. Straddling Two Continents: Social Policy and Welfare Politics in Turkey. Social Policy & Administration 44 (6): 746–763.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Aysan, Mehmet F. 2013. Reforms and Challenges: The Turkish Pension Regime Revisited. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade 49 (Suppl. 5): 148–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. ———. 2016a. Understanding the Welfare Regime of Turkey: Institutions and Individuals, TUBITAK 3501 Final Report.Google Scholar
  6. ———. 2016b. Social and Cultural Reasons of the Fertility Decline: Turkey in the 2010s, In Proceeding of the 4th Turkish Demography Conference, 155–168. Ankara: HUNEE.Google Scholar
  7. Aysan, Mehmet F., and Ummugulsum Aysan. 2016. Who Cares?: Elderly Care in Turkey. Economia & Lavoro 50 (3): 33–46.Google Scholar
  8. Bugra, Ayse, and Sinem Adar. 2008. Social Policy Change in Countries without Mature Welfare States: The Case of Turkey. New Perspectives on Turkey 38: 83–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bugra, Ayse, and Caglar Keyder. 2006. The Turkish Welfare Regime in Transformation. Journal of European Social Policy 16 (3): 211–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ceylan, Harun. 2016. Yaslilik ve Refah Devleti. Istanbul: Acilim.Google Scholar
  11. Deacon, Bob. 2000. Eastern European Welfare States: The Impact of the Politics of Globalization. Journal of European Social Policy 10 (2): 146–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Esping-Andersen, Gosta. 1990. The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  13. ———. 1999. Social Foundations of Post-Industrial Economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ferrera, Maurizio. 1996. The Southern Model of Welfare in social Europe. Journal of European Social Policy 6 (1): 17–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ferrera, Maurizio, and Martin Rhodes. 2000. Recasting European Welfare States. London: Frank Cass.Google Scholar
  16. Gal, John. 2010. Is There an Extended Family of Mediterranean Welfare States? Journal of European Social Policy 20 (4): 283–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gough, Ian. 1996. Social Assistance in Southern Europe. South European Society and Politics 1 (1): 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. ———. 2001. Globalization and Regional Welfare Regimes: The East Asian Case. Global Social Policy 1 (2): 166–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Jawad, Rana. 2009. Social Welfare and Religion in the Middle East: A Lebanese Perspective. Bristol: Policy Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Koc, Ismet, Tugba Adali, Serdar Polat, and Hande D. Turk. 2015. Changes in Family Structure in Turkey: 1968–2013. In Hacettepe University Institute of Population Studies, Turkey Demographic and Health Survey: Study of Advanced Analysis, Hacettepe University Institute of Population Studies, 1–47. Ankara: T. R. Ministry of Development and TUBITAK.Google Scholar
  21. Korpi, Walter, and Joakim Palme. 1998. The Paradox of Redistribution and Strategies of Equality: Welfare State Institutions, Inequality, and Poverty in the Western Countries. American Sociological Review 63: 661–687.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Krahn, Harvey, Graham S. Lowe, and Karen Hughes. 2007. Work, Industry and Canadian Society. Toronto: Thompson-Nelson.Google Scholar
  23. Mishra, Ramesh. 1999. Globalization and the Welfare State. Cheltenham/Northampton: E. Elgar.Google Scholar
  24. Myles, John. 2002. A New Social Contract for the Elderly. In Why We Need a New Welfare State, ed. Gosta Esping-Andersen, 130–172. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. O’Connor, James. 1973. The Fiscal Crisis of the State. London: St Martins Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. OECD. 2008. OECD Glossary of Statistical Terms. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  27. ———. 2011. Pensions at a Glance: Retirement-Income Systems in OECD Countries. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  28. ———. 2015. Education at a Glance 2015: OECD Indicators. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  29. ———. 2017. OECD Health Statistics 2016. http://www.oecd.org/els/health-systems/health-statistics.htm. Accessed 10 April.
  30. Offe, Claus. 1984. Contradictions of the Welfare State. London: Hutchinson Education.Google Scholar
  31. Pierson, Christopher. 2007. Beyond the Welfare State? The New Political Economy of Welfare. Pennsylvania: The Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Rifkin, Jeremy. 2004. The End of Work. Rev. ed. New York: Tarcher/Penguin.Google Scholar
  33. Scruggs, Lyle, and James Allan. 2006. Welfare-State De-Commodification in 18 OECD Countries: A Replication and Revision. Journal of European Social Policy 16 (1): 55–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Social Security Institution. 2017. Work Place and Insured Person Statistics 2015. http://www.sgk.gov.tr/wps/portal/sgk/tr/kurumsal/istatistik/sgk_istatistik_yilliklari. Accessed 25 May.
  35. Spicker, Paul. 1995. Social Policy: Themes and Approaches. London: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  36. ———. 2014. Social Policy: Theory and Practice. Bristol: Policy Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. The Ministry of National Education. 2017. National Education Statistics Formal Education 2016–2017 (1st Semester). Ankara: Ministry of National Education.Google Scholar
  38. TOKI. 2017. TOKI Housing Programs. https://www.toki.gov.tr/en/housing-programs.html. Accessed 15 April.
  39. Trifiletti, Rossana. 1999. Southern European Welfare Regimes and the Worsening Position of Women. Journal of European Social Policy 9 (1): 49–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. TURKSTAT. 2017. Main Statistics. http://www.turkstat.gov.tr. Accessed 20 June.
  41. Walker, Alan, and Chack Kie Wong. 2005. Conclusion: From Confucianism to Globalisation. In East Asian Welfare Regimes in Transition, ed. Alan Walker and Chack Kie Wong, 213–224. Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
  42. World Bank. 2015. Supply and Demand for Child Care Services in Turkey, Report No. 98884TR. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mehmet Fatih Aysan
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of SociologyIstanbul Sehir UniversityIstanbulTurkey

Personalised recommendations