The Role of the State in the Turkish Economy
The role of the state in economic performance is critical for almost every country. This chapter reviews and assesses the effectiveness of the state in the Turkish economy over the last 15 years. A well-functioning state is key for Turkey to be prosperous and have a larger say in the global economy and for its citizens to have higher living standards. Turkey needs new investments and reforms to escape the middle-income trap. To make this happen, the state should undertake a number of important tasks, from industrial policies to institutional reforms. This chapter argues that making the institutional infrastructure more inclusive, implementing smart industrial policies, and improving the welfare state mechanism are the vital issues the state should focus on to take the Turkish economy to higher steps of the development ladder.
KeywordsState Institutions Fiscal policy Industrial policy
JEL CodesH20 H50 O23 O43
- Acemoglu, Daron, and James A. Robinson. 2012. Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power, Prosperity and Poverty. London: Profile Books.Google Scholar
- Akin, Guzin G., Ahmet F. Aysan, and Yildiran Levent. 2009. Transfomation of the Turkish Financial Sector in the Aftermath of the 2001 Crisis. In Turkey and the Global Economy: Neo-Liberal Restructuring and Integration in the Post-Crisis Era, ed. Ziya Öniş and Fikret Şenses, 73–100. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Amsden, Alice. 1989. Asia’s Next Giant: South Korea and Late Industrialization. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Atun, Rıfat, Sabahattin Aydın, Ssarbani Chakraborty, Safir Sümer, Meltem Aran, Ipek Gürol, Serpil Nazlıoğlu, Şenay Özgülcü, Banu Ayar, Uğur Dilmen, and Recep Akdağ. 2013. Universal Health Coverage in Turkey: Enhancement of Equity. The Lancet 382 (9886): 65–99.Google Scholar
- Azevedo, Joao Pedro, and Aziz Atamanov. 2014. Pathways to the Middle Class in Turkey: How Have Reducing Poverty and Boosting Shared Prosperity Helped? World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 6834.Google Scholar
- Babacan, Mehmet. 2010. Whither Axis Shift: A Perspective from Turkey’s Foreign Trade, SETA Policy Report No. 4. Ankara: SETA.Google Scholar
- Brynjolfsson, Erik, and Andrew McAfee. 2014. The Second Machine Age. In Work, Progress, and Prosperity in a Time of Brilliant Technologies. New York: WW Norton & Company.Google Scholar
- Chang, Ha-Joon. 2002. Kicking Away the Ladder: Development Strategy in Historical Perspective. London: Anthem Press.Google Scholar
- Düzel, Neşe. 2003. Hükümet Duble Yollari Yapamaz [The Government Cannot Build Divided Highways]. Radikal, January 27. http://www.radikal.com.tr/turkiye/hukumet-duble-yollari-yapamaz-658973/. Accessed 12 June 2017.
- Evans, Peter. 1995. Embedded Autonomy: States and Industrial Transformation. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Hirschman, Albert O. 1958. The Strategy of Economic Growth. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
- Invest in Turkey. 2015. Turkey Ranks Second in PPP Investment Projects—World Bank. http://www.invest.gov.tr/en-US/infocenter/news/Pages/100615-turkey-ranks-second-in-ppp-infrastructure-projects.aspx. Accessed 10 April 2017.
- Istanbul’s Yavuz Sultan Selim Bridge Toll Set to Be $3 Plus VAT. Daily Sabah, August 15, 2016. https://www.dailysabah.com/business/2016/08/15/istanbuls-yavuz-sultan-selim-bridge-toll-set-to-be-3-plus-vat. Accessed 12 Apr 2017.
- Karagöl, Erdal, and Nergis Dama. 2015. Geçmişten Günümüze Sosyal Yardımlar [Social Benefits From Past to Present], SETA Analiz No: 139. İstanbul: SETA.Google Scholar
- Mazzucato, Mariana. 2013. The Entrepreneurial State: Debunking Public vs. Private Sector Myths. London: Anthem Press.Google Scholar
- Musgrave, Richard A. 1959. The Theory of Public Finance. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc.Google Scholar
- Rodrik, Dani. 2008. One Economics, Many Recipes: Globalization, Institutions, and Economic Growth. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Schneider, Friedrich. 2015. Size and Development of the Shadow Economy of 31 European and 5 Other OECD Countries from 2003 to 2015: Different Developments. Mimeo. Linz: Department of Economics, Johannes Kepler University.Google Scholar
- Schwab, Klaus. 2017. The Fourth Industrial Revolution. New York: Crown.Google Scholar
- Selim, Raziye, Günçavdı Ömer, and Ayşe A. Bayar. 2014. Türkiye’de Bireysel Gelir Dağılımı Eşitsizlikleri: Fonksiyonel Gelir Kaynakları ve Bölgesel Eşitsizlikler. TÜSİAD-T/2014-06/554.Google Scholar
- Sönmez, Mustafa. 2014. Private-Public Partnership Projects Reach $88 Billion. Hürriyet Daily News, April 28. http://www.hurriyetdailynews.com/private-public-partnership-projects-reach-88-billion.aspx?pageID=238&nID=65626&NewsCatID=344. Accessed 4 Apr 2017.
- Tatliyer, Mevlüt, and Nurullah Gur. 2016. The Resilience of the Turkish Economy After the Failed Coup Attempt, SETA Analysis, No: 20. İstanbul: SETA.Google Scholar
- Tiryakioğlu, Murat. 2016. Türkiye Ekonomisinde Geç Kalkınmanın ve Yerli Üretimin Ekonomi Politiği [The Political Economy of Late Development and Domestic Production in Turkish Economy]. Ege Academic Review 16 (2): 177–195.Google Scholar
- Todaro, Michael P., and Stephen Smith. 2011. Economic Development. Essex: Pearson Addison Wesley.Google Scholar
- Turkey’s Shadow Economy Decreasing in Size. Daily Sabah, 105, January 15, 2015. https://www.dailysabah.com/economy/2015/01/15/turkeys-shadow-economy-decreasing-in-size. Accessed 15 Apr 2017.
- Üçkardeşler, Emre. 2015. Turkey’s Changing Social Policy Landscape. Turkish Policy Quarterly 13 (4): 149–161.Google Scholar
- Ünay, Sadık. 2010. Economic Diplomacy for Competitiveness: Globalization and Turkey’s New Foreign Policy. Perceptions 15 (3–4): 21–47.Google Scholar
- Wade, Robert. 1990. Governing the Market: Economic Theory and the Role of Government in East Asian Industrialization. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Weiss, Linda, and John M. Hobson. 1995. States and Economic Development: A Comparative Historical Analysis. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
- World Bank. 2014. Turkey’s Transition: Integration, Inclusion and Institutions, Main Report No. 90509. Washington, DC: World Bank Group.Google Scholar