Beyond Planning and Liberalization: Foreign Trade and Industrial Development in Turkey

  • Mehmet Babacan
Chapter
First Online:

Abstract

After a brief open-economy experience during the 1920s, the Turkish economy could be regarded as state-controlled, planned, and partially closed for the following half a century. Trade, meanwhile, played a limited role and, aside from imported raw materials and exports of agricultural products, did not constitute a significant portion of economic activity. Industry developed – though limited – under a strategy of import substitution in 1960s and 1970s. Along with other major developing countries, Turkey has also witnessed a period of commercial and financial openness, export-oriented industrial production, and a growth model that led to high growth rates, increasing indebtedness at the state level, and budget and current account deficits in the 1980s. Political and macroeconomic instability for the whole 1990s led to unsteady growth cycles under unfinished industrialization and unregulated liberalization processes.

The AK Party period (2002–2017) represents a threshold for Turkish industrial, commercial, and financial expansion within a relatively stable environment that then faced several challenges. The first decade of the AK Party government is often described as the final attempt to do the unfinished job of liberalization, both political and economic. Between 2012 and 2017 however, Turkey’s industry, businesses at all scales, financial, and political institutions have been subjected to difficult stress tests, revealing unresolved structural issues. New challenges due to the changing nature of world politics, regional and internal dynamics, and global economic developments, however, are now forcing Turkey to revisit its export-led growth strategy based on reindustrialization, producing more capital-intensive goods with a greater technology component.

This chapter asserts that Turkey’s rising trade around the world could hold strong potential with respect to reindustrialization in strategic sectors. Lastly, a new phase of trade expansion should be launched over not only employment but also the development of a high-skilled labor force, proprietary technology in strategic sectors, and sustainable finance.

Keywords

Trade policy Industrial policy Deindustrialization Reindustrialization Planning Economic development Turkey 

JEL Codes

O24 O25 O14 O21 O10 O52 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access

References

  1. Ahn, JaeBin, Dabla-Norris, Era, Duval, Romain, Hu, Bingjie and Njie, Lamin. 2016. Reassessing the Productivity Gains from Trade Liberalization, IMF Working Paper, WP/16/77.Google Scholar
  2. Alaya, Marouane and Mezghani, Imed. 2013. The Growth of Turkey in World Trade: Opportunity or Threat for MENA Countries? The Economic Research Forum (ERF) Working Paper, No. 763.Google Scholar
  3. Aydın, Faruk, Saygılı, Hülya and Saygılı, Mesut. 2007. Empirical Analysis of Structural Change in Turkish Exports, The Central Bank of the Republic of Turkey (CBRT) Working Paper, No. 07/08.Google Scholar
  4. Aysan, A.F., and Y.S. Hacıhasanoğlu. 2007. Investigation into the Determinants of Turkish Export-Boom in 2000s, The. Journal of International Trade and Diplomacy 1 (2): 159–202.Google Scholar
  5. Babacan, Mehmet. 2011. Whither Axis Shift: A Perspective from Turkey’s Foreign Trade. Insight Turkey 13 (1): 129–157.Google Scholar
  6. ———. 2015. Change and Continuity in Economic Planning: A Methodological Survey. In Economic Planning and Industrial Policy in the Globalizing Economy, ed. Murat Yülek, 43–58. Switzerland: Springer.Google Scholar
  7. Baysan, Tercan, and Charles Blitzer. 1991. Turkey. In Liberalizing Foreign Trade: The Experience of New Zealand, Spain and Turkey, The IBRD/World Bank Project, ed. D. Papageorgiou, M. Michaely, and A.M. Choksi. Cambridge, MA: Basil Blackwell Inc.Google Scholar
  8. Bhagwati, Jagdish. 1978. Foreign Trade Regimes and Economic Development: Anatomy and Consequences of Exchange Control Regimes, NBER Conference Series. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  9. Chenery, Hollis B. 1961. Comparative Advantage and Development Policy. The American Economic Review 51 (1): 18–51.Google Scholar
  10. Civan et al. 2013. The Effect of New Turkish Foreign Policy on International Trade. Insight Turkey 15 (3): 107–122.Google Scholar
  11. Eizenstat, Stuart E. 1984. Reindustrialization Through Coordination or Chaos? Yale Journal on Regulation 2 (1): 39–51.Google Scholar
  12. Engel, Jakob and Taglioni, Daria. 2017. The Middle-Income Trap and Upgrading Along Global Value Chains. In Global Value Chain Development Report 2017, 119–139. World Bank Group, Washington, DC: USA.Google Scholar
  13. Etzioni, Amitai. 1981. Reindustrialization and Vocational Education, The Ohio State University The National Center for Research in Vocational Education Occasional Paper No. 76, pp. 1–12.Google Scholar
  14. Gür, N., S. Ünay, and Ş. Dilek. 2017. Sanayiyi Yeniden Düşünmek: Küresel Teknolojik Dönüşümün Dünya ve Türkiye Ekonomisine Yansımaları. İstanbul: SETA Kitapları.Google Scholar
  15. Helpman, Elhanan, and Paul R. Krugman. 1986. Market Structure and Foreign Trade. 2nd ed. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  16. Isard, Walter. 1954. Location Theory and Trade Theory: Short-Run Analysis. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 68 (2): 305–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Johnson, Robert C., and Noguera, Guillermo. 2016. A Portrait of Trade in Value Added Over Four Decades, NBER Working Series, No. 22974. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  18. Krueger, Anne. 1974. Foreign Trade Regimes and Economic Development: Turkey, NBER Conference Series. New York City: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Krugman, Paul R. 1988. Deindustrialization, Reindustrialization and the Real Exchange Rate, NBER Working Paper Series, No. 2586. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  20. Kumagai, Satoru. 2015. The Middle-Income Trap from the Viewpoint of Trade Structures: Are the Geese Trapped or Still Flying? Journal of International Commerce, Economics and Policy 6 (3): 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kutlay, Mustafa. 2011. Economy as the ‘Practical Hand’ of ‘New Turkish Foreign Policy’: A Political Economy Explanation. Insight Turkey 13 (1): 67–88.Google Scholar
  22. Lin, Justin Y. 2012. The Quest for Prosperity: How Developing Economies Can Take Off. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Meçik, O., and M. Afşar. 2015. Ekonomide Sanayisizleşme ve OECD Ülkelerine Etkileri. Hacettepe University Journal of Economics and Administrative Sciences 33 (2): 85–111.Google Scholar
  24. Mevel, S., J. Moll de Alba, and N. Oulmane. 2016. Optimal Trade- Integration Schemes in North Africa: Toward a Pro-Industrialization Policy. Journal of Economic Integration 31 (3): 569–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Miller, J.C., T.F. Walton, W.E. Kovacic, and J.A. Rabkin. 1984. Yale Journal on Regulation 2 (1): 1–37.Google Scholar
  26. Norton, R.D. 1986. Industrial Policy and American Renewal. Journal of Economic Literature 24 (1): 1–40.Google Scholar
  27. Porter, Michael E. 2009. The Competitive Advantage of Nations, States and Regions. Harvard Business School Advanced Management Program Presentation, pp. 1–27.Google Scholar
  28. Rodrik, Dani. 1992. The Limits of Trade Policy Reform in Developing Countries. The Journal of Economic Perspectives 6 (1): 87–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Rosenfeld, Stuart A. 1997. Bringing Business Clusters into the Mainstream of Economic Development. European Planning Studies 5 (1): 3–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Rowthorn, R.E., and J.R. Wells. 1987. De-Industrialization and Foreign Trade. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Stevenson, Adlai E., and Richard D. Bartel. 1981. Reindustrialization: Politics and Economics. Challenge 23 (6): 39–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Turkish Exporters Assembly (TIM) Report on Development of Exports, 2001–2016 Report. http://www.tim.org.tr/files/downloads/%C4%B0hracat%C4%B1n%20Geli%C5%9Fim%202001-2016.pdf. Accessed 11 Aug 2017.
  33. Tregenna, Fiona. 2011. Manufacturing Productivity, Deindustrialization and Reindustrialization, United Nations University- WIDER Working Paper, No. 2011/57.Google Scholar
  34. Ünal, Emre. 2016. A Comparative Analysis of Export Growth in Turkey and China through Macroeconomic and Institutional Factors. Evolutionary and Institutional Economic Review 13 (1): 57–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Yağcı, Mustafa. 2017. The Political Economy of AK Party Rule in Turkey: From a Regulatory State to a 1 Developmental State? Insight Turkey 19 (2): 89–113.Google Scholar
  36. Yeldan, E., and Yıldırım, D. 2015. Küreselleşme ve Sanayisizleşme Bağlamında Türkiye’de ve Dünyada Demokrasi Açığı (Democracy Deficit in Turkey and the World in the Context of Globalization and De-Industrialization). Çalışma ve Toplum 2: 65–88.Google Scholar
  37. Yülek, Murat. 2015. Revisiting National Economic Planning and Industrial Policy: Concepts, Experiences and the Ecosystem. In Economic Planning and Industrial Policy in the Globalizing Economy, ed. Murat Yülek, 3–27. Switzerland: Springer.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mehmet Babacan
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Economics and Finance, School of BusinessIstanbul Medipol UniversityIstanbulTurkey

Personalised recommendations