Skip to main content

Financially Constrained Firms: The Impact of Managerial Optimism and Corporate Investment on Inefficiencies Leading to Low Market Valuation - The Case of Greece

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Economy, Finance and Business in Southeastern and Central Europe

Abstract

Financial constraints in capital markets can underline the macroeconomic effect of fluctuations in investment to cash flow and liquidity which has as a result several firms to reduce their access to low-cost finance. The examination of this aspect in detail determines the magnitude of the effects of internal finance on investment. Diversification as an underlying factor of financial constraints can create several costs. Diversified firms have the tendency to overinvest in lines of business which display poor investment opportunities. Diversification indeed reduces value. This loss in value is found mainly for firms of all sizes having managers with a higher level of optimism. The link between optimism and corporate investment is more pronounced in financially constrained firms. When the wedge between the internal and external cost of funds increases, a firm is considered to be more financially constrained. Managers are undisputedly optimistic and firms with optimistic managers tend to invest more. The investment of firms with optimistic managers is more sensitive to cash flow especially for financially constrained firms. Analysing a sample of listed companies in Greece, it is found that the higher the managerial optimism, the lower the excess value of a firm. Optimism and financial constraint measures are based on the insider stock transaction behaviour of all senior managers they have to report to the Hellenic Capital Market Commission. These findings show that the investigation of decision-making processes in Greece is crucial.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Almeida, H., & Campello, M. (2007). Financial constraints, asset tangibility, and corporate investment. Review of Financial Studies, 20(5), 1429–1460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barros, L. A. B., & Silveira, A. (2009). Overconfidence, managerial optimism and the determinants of capital structure. Brazilian Review of Finance, 6(3), 293–335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennedsen, M., Perez-Gonzalez, F., & Wolfenzon, D. (2006). Do CEOs matter? (Working Paper No FIN-06-032). New York: New York University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, P. G., & Ofek, E. (1995). Diversification’s effect on firm value. Journal of Financial Economics, 37(1), 39–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertrand, M., & Schoar, A. (2003). Managing with style: The effect of managers on firm policies. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118(4), 1169–1208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bris, A., Koskinen, Y., & Nilsson, M. (2006). The real effects of the Euro: Evidence from corporate investments. Review of Finance, 10(1), 1–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chandler, A. D. (1977). The visible hand. Cambridge: Belknap Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cleary, S. (1999). The relationship between firm investment and financial status. Journal of Finance, 54(2), 673–692.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doukas, J. A., & Petmezas, D. (2007). Acquisitions, overconfident managers and self-attribution bias. European Financial Management, 13(3), 531–577.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fazzari, S., Hubbard, R. G., & Petersen, B. C. (1988). Financing constraints and corporate investment. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 0(1), 141–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, M., & Hirn, C. (2007). The measurement of corporate financial constraints (Working Paper). Mannheim: University of Mannheim.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, M., & Muller, S. (2010). Is the diversification discount caused by the book value bias of debt? Journal of Banking and Finance, 34(10), 2307–2317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, M., & Weber, M. (2007). Overconfidence and trading volume. Geneva Risk and Insurance Review, 32(1), 1–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, M., Schafers, P., & Weber, M. (2008). Managerial optimism and corporate investment: Is the CEO alone responsible for the relation? (AFA 2008 New Orleans Meetings Paper).

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, D., & Brenner, L. (2004). Perspectives on probability judgment calibration. In D. J. Koehler & N. Harvey (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of judgment and decision making (pp. 177–199). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hackbarth, D. (2008). Managerial traits and capital structure decisions. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 43(4), 843–882.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heaton, J. B. (2002). Managerial optimism and corporate finance. Financial Management, 31(2), 33–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, M. (1986). Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance, and takeovers. American Economic Review, 76(2), 323–329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., & Tversky, A. (1982). Judgement under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, S. N., & Zingales, L. (1997). Do investment-cash flow sensitivities provide useful measures of financing constraints. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112(1), 169–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lang, L. H. P., & Stulz, R. E. (1994). Tobin’s q, corporate diversification and firm performance. Journal of Political Economy, 102(6), 1248–1280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, Y., Hu, S., & Chen, M. (2008). Testing pecking order prediction from the viewpoint of managerial optimism: Some empirical evidence from Taiwan. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 16(1–2), 160–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malmendier, U., & Tate, G. (2005a). CEO overconfidence and corporate investment. Journal of Finance, 60(6), 2661–2700.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malmendier, U., & Tate, G. (2005b). Does overconfidence affect corporate investment? CEO overconfidence measures revisited. European Financial Management, 11(5), 649–659.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malmendier, U., & Tate, G. (2008). Who makes acquisitions? CEO overconfidence and the market’s reaction. Journal of Financial Economics, 89(1), 20–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moyen, N. (2004). Investment-cash flow sensitivities: Constrained versus unconstrained firms. Journal of Finance, 59(5), 2061–2092.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myers, S. C. (1977). The determinants of corporate borrowing. Journal of Financial Economics, 5(2), 147–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oskamp, S. (1965). Overconfidence in case study judgements. The Journal of Consulting Psychology, 29(3), 261–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ravina, E., & Sapienza, P. (2010). What do independent directors know? Evidence from their trading. The Review of Financial Studies, 23(3), 962–1003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roll, R. (1986). The hubris hypothesis of corporate takeovers. The Journal of Business, 59(2), 197–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shin, H., & Stulz, R. (1998). Are internal capital markets efficient? Quarterly Journal of Economics, 113(2), 531–552.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stulz, R. M. (1990). Managerial discretion and optimal financing policies. The Journal of Financial Economics, 26(1), 3–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211(4481), 453–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1986). Rational choice and the framing of decisions. The Journal of Business, 59(4), 251–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Villalonga, B. (2004a). Diversification discount or premium? New evidence from the business information tracking series. The Journal of Finance, 59(2), 475–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Villalonga, B. (2004b). Does diversification cause the ‘diversification discount’? Financial Management, 33(2), 5–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinstein, N. D. (1980). Unrealistic optimism about future life events. The Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39(5), 806–820.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weston, J. F. (1970). The nature and significance of conglomerate firms. St John’s Law Review, 0(44), 66–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whited, T. M., & Wu, G. (2006). Financial constraints risk. Review of Financial Studies, 19(2), 531–559.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dimitrios Maditinos .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Maditinos, D., Tsinani, A., Šević, Ž., Stankevičienė, J. (2018). Financially Constrained Firms: The Impact of Managerial Optimism and Corporate Investment on Inefficiencies Leading to Low Market Valuation - The Case of Greece. In: Karasavvoglou, A., Goić, S., Polychronidou, P., Delias, P. (eds) Economy, Finance and Business in Southeastern and Central Europe. Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70377-0_26

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics