Skip to main content

Uncertainty Quantification of Fatigue Life Prediction in Welded Structures Using Microstructure-Based Simulations

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on New Trends in Fatigue and Fracture (NT2F 2017)

Abstract

A framework for uncertainty quantification of fatigue life prediction in welded structures has been developed based on multi-scale finite element analysis (FEA) considering microstructure. The multi-scale FEA consists of the following procedures: (i) mechanical and thermal properties are estimated by using commercially available software and database; (ii) temperature field, residual stress and distortion generated during a welding process is calculated on the global model by thermo-mechanical FEA; (iii) macroscopic stress field under cyclic loading condition is calculated with a hardening constitutive model; (iv) the mesoscopic stress field is derived by crystal plasticity finite element analysis with sub-model technique and the cycles for a fatigue crack initiation is analyzed by strain energy accumulation on the slip plane; (v) the cycles for fatigue crack propagation is analyzed by extended finite element method and the total number of cycles to the failure is obtained. The possible uncertainties in the current model include physical variability (weld shape, residual stress, loading and microstructure), data uncertainty due to measurement error and modeling uncertainty in numerical approximations and finite element discretization. A sensitivity analysis was performed by changing the input parameters in the proposed simulation. Additionally, fatigue database of weld joint were aggregated from public databases, published papers and academic resources, and compared with simulation results to quantify the contribution of each source of uncertainty. The effects of residual stress, toe radius and microstructure on the fatigue life of welded joints were evaluated by the proposed methodology. It was shown that the fatigue life increased with the toe radius, and the scattering in high cycle region appeared due to considering microstructure. The features and limitations of our methods will be discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. J. Goldak, A. Chakravarti, M. Bibby, Metall. Trans. B, 15 (1984) 299–305.

    Google Scholar 

  2. A. Kolmogorov, Izvestia Akademia Nauk Serie Mathematica SSSR, 1 (1937) 355–359.

    Google Scholar 

  3. D.P. Koistinen, R.E. Marburger, Acta Metall., 7 (1959) 50–60.

    Google Scholar 

  4. R. Blondeau, P. Maynier, J. Dollet, Mémoires scientifiques de la Revue de métallurgie, 70 (1973) 883–892.

    Google Scholar 

  5. J.B. Leblond, J. Devaux, Acta Metall., 32 (1984) 137–146.

    Google Scholar 

  6. F. Briffod, T. Shiraiwa, M. Enoki, Materials Science and Engineering: A, 695 (2017) 165–177.

    Google Scholar 

  7. J.W. Hutchinson, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences, 348 (1976) 101–127.

    Google Scholar 

  8. F. Roters, P. Eisenlohr, C. Kords, D.D. Tjahjanto, M. Diehl, D. Raabe, Procedia IUTAM, 3 (2012) 3–10.

    Google Scholar 

  9. C.O. Frederick, P.J. Armstrong, Mater. High Temp., 24 (2007) 1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  10. D.D. Tjahjanto, S. Turteltaub, A.S.J. Suiker, Continuum Mech. Thermodyn., 19 (2008) 399–422.

    Google Scholar 

  11. K. Tanaka, T. Mura, J. Appl. Mech., 48 (1981) 97–103.

    Google Scholar 

  12. T. Hoshide, K. Kusuura, Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures, 21 (1998) 201–213.

    Google Scholar 

  13. E.F. Rybicki, M.F. Kanninen, Eng. Fract. Mech., 9 (1977) 931–938.

    Google Scholar 

  14. JSSC, Fatigue Design Recommendations for Steel Structures, Gihodo, Tokyo, Japan, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  15. N. Tagaki, A. Kondo, K. Yamada, Y. Kikuchi, Journal of Japan Society of Civil Engineers, 324 (1982) 151–159.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was partially supported by the Cross-ministerial Strategic Innovation Promotion Program (SIP)—Structural Materials for Innovation—unit D62 operated by The Cabinet Office, Japan, and Japan Society for the Promotion of Science KAKENHI (Grant Number 17K14832).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Takayuki Shiraiwa .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Shiraiwa, T., Briffod, F., Enoki, M. (2018). Uncertainty Quantification of Fatigue Life Prediction in Welded Structures Using Microstructure-Based Simulations. In: Ambriz, R., Jaramillo, D., Plascencia, G., Nait Abdelaziz, M. (eds) Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on New Trends in Fatigue and Fracture. NT2F 2017. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70365-7_38

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics