Abstract
The issue of dying with dignity has gained broad public resonance in recent decades due to technological developments that have steadily raised average life expectancy, and the deepening internalization of liberal rights discourse in society. Along with these developments, the involvement of institutional entrepreneurship in policy change has been increasing too. Some countries have already regulated dying with dignity in various ways (for example, Oregon legalized assisted suicide in 1998; the Netherlands legalized active euthanasia in 2001). Nevertheless, until 2000, this issue was not regulated in Israel, leaving it in the hands of the court system. That year, Israeli Health Minister Benizri announced the establishment of a public professional committee to compile a comprehensive bill on the matter, which led to a process of thorough legislation that was concluded at the end of 2005, when the Dying Patient Law underwent a second and third reading in the Israeli Parliament (Knesset).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
In 2001, the tables turned, and now it is the press which turns to LILACH whenever a relevant case arises.
References
Arian, A., & Keissar-Sugarman, A. (2011). A portrait of Israeli Jews: Beliefs, observance and values of Israeli Jews. Jerusalem: Israel Democracy Institute. (in Hebrew).
Bakir, C. (2009). Policy entrepreneurship and institutional change: Multilevel governance of central banking reform. Governance, 22(4), 571–598.
Bakir, C. (2013). Bank behaviour and resilience: The effects of structures, institutions and agents. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Bakir, C., & Jarvis, D. S. L. (Eds.) (2017). Institutional and policy entrepreneurship and policy change in public policy making. In Institutional entrepreneurship and policy change: Theoretical and empirical explorations. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Bakir, C., & Jarvis, D. S. L. (forthcoming 2018). Institutional entrepreneurship and policy change. Policy and Society.
Barilan, Y. M. (2003). Dying patient: Halachic background, Steinberg report and bio-ethical discourse in Israel. Medicine, 142, 562–558. (in Hebrew).
Barilan, Y. M. (2013). Jewish bioethics: Rabbinic law and theology in their social and historical contexts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Baumgartner, F. R., & Jones, B. D. (1991). Agenda dynamics and policy subsystems. The Journal of Politics, 53(4), 1044–1074.
Billings, J. A., & Krakauer, E. L. (2011). On patient autonomy and physician responsibility in end-of-life care. Archives of Internal Medicine, 171(9), 849–853.
Campbell, J. L. (2004). Institutional change and globalization. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Cohen, A., & Susser, B. (2003). From accommodation to escalation. Tel-Aviv: Schocken Press. (in Hebrew).
Considine, M. (1998). Making up the government’s mind: Agenda setting in a parliamentary system. Governance, 11(3), 297–317.
Dahl, R. A. (1961). Who governs? New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Dees, J. G. (1998). The meaning of social entrepreneurship: Comments and suggestions contributed from the Social Entrepreneurship Funders Working Group. Retrieved from http://scholar.google.co.il/scholar?hl=iw&q=social+entrepreneurship&btnG=
Downs, A. (1972). The issue-attention cycle and the political economy of improving our environment. In The political economy of environmental control (pp. 9–34). Berkeley: University of California Press.
Drucker, P. (1985). Innovation and entrepreneurship. New York, NY: Harper Collins.
Edwards, C., Jones, G., Lawton, A., & Llewellyn, N. (2002). Public entrepreneurship: Rhetoric, reality and context. International Journal of Public Administration, 25(12), 1539–1554.
Gavison, R. (1998). Constitutional revolution: A description of reality or self-fulfilling prophecy. Misphatim, 21, 34–47. (in Hebrew).
Gavison, R., Kremnitzer, M., & Dotan, Y. (2000). Judicial activism: For and against: The role of the high court of justice in Israeli society. Jerusalem: Magnes-Hebrew University Press. (in Hebrew).
Gostin, L. O. (1995). Informed consent, cultural sensitivity, and respect for persons. JAMA, 274(10), 844–845.
Guttman, E. (1996). The religious divide. In M. Lisak & B. Kani-Paz (Eds.), Israel towards the new millennium: Society, politics and culture. Jerusalem: Magnes, Hebrew University. (in Hebrew).
Hart, M. M., Stevenson, H. H., & Dial, J. (1995). Entrepreneurship: A definition revisited. In W. D. Bygrave et al. (Eds.), Frontiers of entrepreneurship research (pp. 75–89). Wellesley, MA: Babson College.
Kingdon, J. W. (1995). Agendas, alternatives, and public policies (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: Little Brown.
Kretzmer, D. (1996). The new basic laws on human rights: A mini-revolution in Israeli constitutional law? Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights, 14, 173.
Levy, J. S. (2008). Case studies: Types, designs and logics of inference. Conflict Management and Peace Science, 25, 1–18.
López, E. J. (2002). The legislator as political entrepreneur: Investment in political capital. The Review of Austrian Economics, 15(2–3), 211–228.
McCaffrey, M., & Salerno, J. T. (2011). A theory of political entrepreneurship. Modern Economy, 2(4), 552–560.
Meydani, A. (2009). Political transformations and political entrepreneurs: Israel in comparative perspective. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Meydani, A. (2011). The Israeli Supreme Court and the human rights revolution: Courts as agenda setters. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Meydani, A. (2015). Political entrepreneurs and institutional change: Governability, liberal political culture, and the 1992 electoral reform in Israel. In M. Lee, I. N. Aflaki, & P. Petridou (Eds.), Entrepreneurship in the polis: Understanding political entrepreneurship. Abingdon: Ashgate Publishers.
Mintrom, M. (2000). Policy entrepreneurs and school choice. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
Mintrom, M., & Norman, P. (2009). Policy entrepreneurship and policy change. Policy Studies Journal, 37(4), 649–667.
Mucciaroni, G. (1992). The garbage can model & the study of policy making: A critique. Polity, 24(3), 459–482.
Neubauer-Shani, M. (2007). Agenda-setting in the Israeli context: State and religion issues. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The Hebrew University, Jerusalem (In Hebrew).
Petridou, E., Aflaki, I. N., & Miles, L. (2015). Unpacking the theoretical boxes of political entrepreneurship. In M. Lee, I. N. Aflaki, & P. Petridou (Eds.), Entrepreneurship in the polis: Understanding political entrepreneurship. Abingdon: Ashgate.
Rehbock, T. (2011). Limits of autonomy in biomedical ethics? Conceptual clarifications. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 20(4), 524–532.
Roberts, N., & King, P. (1991). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sapir, G. (2009). Constitutional revolutions: Israel as a case-study. International Journal of Law in Context, 5(4), 355–378.
Schneider, M., & Teske, P. (1992). Toward a theory of the political entrepreneur: Evidence from local government. American Political Science Review, 86(3), 737–747.
Schneider, M., Teske, P., & Mintrom, M. (1995). Public entrepreneurs: Agents for change in American government. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Sheingate, A. D. (2003). Political entrepreneurship, institutional change, and American political development. Studies in American Political Development, 17(2), 185–203.
Steinberg, A. (2003). Decision-making process at the end of life. Medicine, 142, 672–673. (In Hebrew).
Steinberg, A., & Sprung, C. L. (2006). The dying patient: New Israeli legislation. Intensive Care Medicine, 32(8), 1234–1237.
Stone, D. A. (1989). Causal stories and the formation of policy agendas. Political science quarterly, 104(2), 281–300.
Taylor, H. (2014). Promoting a patient’s right to autonomy: Implications for primary healthcare practitioners. Part 1. Primary Health Care, 24(2), 36–41.
Toktz’inski, J. (1947). Bridge of life. Jerusalem: Chabad Library. (In Hebrew).
Turner, L. G. (1996). Bioethics in a pluralistic world: Truth telling, informed consent, and euthanasia. Health Care Analysis, 11(2), 99–117.
Wear, S., & Moreno, J. D. (1994). Informed consent: Patient autonomy and physician beneficence within clinical medicine. HEC Forum, 6(5), 323–325.
Zohlnhofer, R., & Rub, F. (Eds.). (2016). Decision-making under ambiguity and time constraints: Assessing the multiple-streams framework. Colchester: ECPR Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Neubauer-Shani, M., Shamir, O. (2018). Political Entrepreneurship and Policy Change in the End of Life Debate in Israel. In: Bakir, C., Jarvis, D. (eds) Institutional Entrepreneurship and Policy Change. Studies in the Political Economy of Public Policy. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70350-3_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70350-3_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-70349-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-70350-3
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)