Skip to main content

Political Entrepreneurship and Policy Change in the End of Life Debate in Israel

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Institutional Entrepreneurship and Policy Change

Part of the book series: Studies in the Political Economy of Public Policy ((PEPP))

  • 801 Accesses

Abstract

The issue of dying with dignity has gained broad public resonance in recent decades due to technological developments that have steadily raised average life expectancy, and the deepening internalization of liberal rights discourse in society. Along with these developments, the involvement of institutional entrepreneurship in policy change has been increasing too. Some countries have already regulated dying with dignity in various ways (for example, Oregon legalized assisted suicide in 1998; the Netherlands legalized active euthanasia in 2001). Nevertheless, until 2000, this issue was not regulated in Israel, leaving it in the hands of the court system. That year, Israeli Health Minister Benizri announced the establishment of a public professional committee to compile a comprehensive bill on the matter, which led to a process of thorough legislation that was concluded at the end of 2005, when the Dying Patient Law underwent a second and third reading in the Israeli Parliament (Knesset).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In 2001, the tables turned, and now it is the press which turns to LILACH whenever a relevant case arises.

References

  • Arian, A., & Keissar-Sugarman, A. (2011). A portrait of Israeli Jews: Beliefs, observance and values of Israeli Jews. Jerusalem: Israel Democracy Institute. (in Hebrew).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakir, C. (2009). Policy entrepreneurship and institutional change: Multilevel governance of central banking reform. Governance, 22(4), 571–598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bakir, C. (2013). Bank behaviour and resilience: The effects of structures, institutions and agents. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bakir, C., & Jarvis, D. S. L. (Eds.) (2017). Institutional and policy entrepreneurship and policy change in public policy making. In Institutional entrepreneurship and policy change: Theoretical and empirical explorations. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakir, C., & Jarvis, D. S. L. (forthcoming 2018). Institutional entrepreneurship and policy change. Policy and Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barilan, Y. M. (2003). Dying patient: Halachic background, Steinberg report and bio-ethical discourse in Israel. Medicine, 142, 562–558. (in Hebrew).

    Google Scholar 

  • Barilan, Y. M. (2013). Jewish bioethics: Rabbinic law and theology in their social and historical contexts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Baumgartner, F. R., & Jones, B. D. (1991). Agenda dynamics and policy subsystems. The Journal of Politics, 53(4), 1044–1074.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Billings, J. A., & Krakauer, E. L. (2011). On patient autonomy and physician responsibility in end-of-life care. Archives of Internal Medicine, 171(9), 849–853.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, J. L. (2004). Institutional change and globalization. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, A., & Susser, B. (2003). From accommodation to escalation. Tel-Aviv: Schocken Press. (in Hebrew).

    Google Scholar 

  • Considine, M. (1998). Making up the government’s mind: Agenda setting in a parliamentary system. Governance, 11(3), 297–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, R. A. (1961). Who governs? New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dees, J. G. (1998). The meaning of social entrepreneurship: Comments and suggestions contributed from the Social Entrepreneurship Funders Working Group. Retrieved from http://scholar.google.co.il/scholar?hl=iw&q=social+entrepreneurship&btnG=

  • Downs, A. (1972). The issue-attention cycle and the political economy of improving our environment. In The political economy of environmental control (pp. 9–34). Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drucker, P. (1985). Innovation and entrepreneurship. New York, NY: Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, C., Jones, G., Lawton, A., & Llewellyn, N. (2002). Public entrepreneurship: Rhetoric, reality and context. International Journal of Public Administration, 25(12), 1539–1554.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gavison, R. (1998). Constitutional revolution: A description of reality or self-fulfilling prophecy. Misphatim, 21, 34–47. (in Hebrew).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gavison, R., Kremnitzer, M., & Dotan, Y. (2000). Judicial activism: For and against: The role of the high court of justice in Israeli society. Jerusalem: Magnes-Hebrew University Press. (in Hebrew).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gostin, L. O. (1995). Informed consent, cultural sensitivity, and respect for persons. JAMA, 274(10), 844–845.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guttman, E. (1996). The religious divide. In M. Lisak & B. Kani-Paz (Eds.), Israel towards the new millennium: Society, politics and culture. Jerusalem: Magnes, Hebrew University. (in Hebrew).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, M. M., Stevenson, H. H., & Dial, J. (1995). Entrepreneurship: A definition revisited. In W. D. Bygrave et al. (Eds.), Frontiers of entrepreneurship research (pp. 75–89). Wellesley, MA: Babson College.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kingdon, J. W. (1995). Agendas, alternatives, and public policies (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: Little Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kretzmer, D. (1996). The new basic laws on human rights: A mini-revolution in Israeli constitutional law? Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights, 14, 173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levy, J. S. (2008). Case studies: Types, designs and logics of inference. Conflict Management and Peace Science, 25, 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • López, E. J. (2002). The legislator as political entrepreneur: Investment in political capital. The Review of Austrian Economics, 15(2–3), 211–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCaffrey, M., & Salerno, J. T. (2011). A theory of political entrepreneurship. Modern Economy, 2(4), 552–560.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meydani, A. (2009). Political transformations and political entrepreneurs: Israel in comparative perspective. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Meydani, A. (2011). The Israeli Supreme Court and the human rights revolution: Courts as agenda setters. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Meydani, A. (2015). Political entrepreneurs and institutional change: Governability, liberal political culture, and the 1992 electoral reform in Israel. In M. Lee, I. N. Aflaki, & P. Petridou (Eds.), Entrepreneurship in the polis: Understanding political entrepreneurship. Abingdon: Ashgate Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mintrom, M. (2000). Policy entrepreneurs and school choice. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mintrom, M., & Norman, P. (2009). Policy entrepreneurship and policy change. Policy Studies Journal, 37(4), 649–667.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mucciaroni, G. (1992). The garbage can model & the study of policy making: A critique. Polity, 24(3), 459–482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neubauer-Shani, M. (2007). Agenda-setting in the Israeli context: State and religion issues. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The Hebrew University, Jerusalem (In Hebrew).

    Google Scholar 

  • Petridou, E., Aflaki, I. N., & Miles, L. (2015). Unpacking the theoretical boxes of political entrepreneurship. In M. Lee, I. N. Aflaki, & P. Petridou (Eds.), Entrepreneurship in the polis: Understanding political entrepreneurship. Abingdon: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rehbock, T. (2011). Limits of autonomy in biomedical ethics? Conceptual clarifications. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 20(4), 524–532.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, N., & King, P. (1991). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sapir, G. (2009). Constitutional revolutions: Israel as a case-study. International Journal of Law in Context, 5(4), 355–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, M., & Teske, P. (1992). Toward a theory of the political entrepreneur: Evidence from local government. American Political Science Review, 86(3), 737–747.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, M., Teske, P., & Mintrom, M. (1995). Public entrepreneurs: Agents for change in American government. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheingate, A. D. (2003). Political entrepreneurship, institutional change, and American political development. Studies in American Political Development, 17(2), 185–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steinberg, A. (2003). Decision-making process at the end of life. Medicine, 142, 672–673. (In Hebrew).

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinberg, A., & Sprung, C. L. (2006). The dying patient: New Israeli legislation. Intensive Care Medicine, 32(8), 1234–1237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stone, D. A. (1989). Causal stories and the formation of policy agendas. Political science quarterly, 104(2), 281–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, H. (2014). Promoting a patient’s right to autonomy: Implications for primary healthcare practitioners. Part 1. Primary Health Care, 24(2), 36–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toktz’inski, J. (1947). Bridge of life. Jerusalem: Chabad Library. (In Hebrew).

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, L. G. (1996). Bioethics in a pluralistic world: Truth telling, informed consent, and euthanasia. Health Care Analysis, 11(2), 99–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wear, S., & Moreno, J. D. (1994). Informed consent: Patient autonomy and physician beneficence within clinical medicine. HEC Forum, 6(5), 323–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zohlnhofer, R., & Rub, F. (Eds.). (2016). Decision-making under ambiguity and time constraints: Assessing the multiple-streams framework. Colchester: ECPR Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Neubauer-Shani, M., Shamir, O. (2018). Political Entrepreneurship and Policy Change in the End of Life Debate in Israel. In: Bakir, C., Jarvis, D. (eds) Institutional Entrepreneurship and Policy Change. Studies in the Political Economy of Public Policy. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70350-3_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics