Profit, Elasticity and Nature

  • Kohei Saito
Chapter
Part of the Luxemburg International Studies in Political Economy book series (LISPE)

Abstract

The problem of Marx’s ‘law of the tendency of the rate of profit to fall’ remains highly controversial today. Marx ceased emphasising the importance of the ‘law’ after 1868, as if he also started doubting its validity. Defending the validity of the law, Saito attempts to explain why Marx seemed to alter his emphasis. According to Saito, this change occurred as Marx more clearly recognised the enormous ‘elasticity of capital’ based on the elasticity of the material world. Marx began intensive research in natural sciences to comprehend how the elasticity of nature could be appropriated by capital to counteract the falling rate of profit. The elasticity of nature is, however, not infinite. When it reaches a limit, it suddenly loses its benefits. Capital continues to overcome any limits of nature, but it ultimately causes ecological crises and undermines the material conditions for free and sustainable human development.

Bibliography

  1. Akashi, H. (2016). The Elasticity of Capital and Ecological Crisis. In Marx-Engels-Jahrbuch 2015/16 (pp. 45–58). Berlin: De Gruyer.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, K. (2010). Marx at the Margins: On Nationalism, Ethnicity, and Non-Western Societies. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Böhm-Bawerk, E. (1896). Zum Abschluss des Marxschen Systems. In O. von Boenigk (Ed.), Staatwissenschaftliche Arbeite. Festgaben für Karl Knies (pp. 87–205). Berlin: Otto Haering.Google Scholar
  4. Bortkiewicz, L. (1952 [1906–7]). Value and Price in the Marxian System. International Economic Papers, 2, 5–60.Google Scholar
  5. Brown, H. (2012). Marx on Gender and the Family: A Critical Study. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Burkett, P. (1999). Marx and Nature: A Red and Green Perspective. New York: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Burkett, P. (2006). Marxism and Ecological Economics. Chicago: Haymarket Books.Google Scholar
  8. Carchedi, G. (2011). Behind the Crisis: Marx’s Dialectics of Value and Knowledge. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
  9. Cullenberg, S. (1994). The Falling Rate of Profit. Recasting the Marxian Debate. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
  10. Foster, J. B. (2000). Marx’s Ecology. Materialism and Nature. New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
  11. Foster, J. B., & Burkett, P. (2016). Marx and the Earth: An Anti-critique. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Foster, J. B., et al. (2011). The Ecological Rift: Capitalism’s War on the Earth. New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
  13. Fraser, N. (2014). Beyond Marx’s Hidden Abode: For an Expanded Conception of Capitalism. New Left Review, 86(March–April), 55–72.Google Scholar
  14. Gorz, A. (2013). Capitalism, Socialism, Ecology. New York: Verso.Google Scholar
  15. Habermas, J. (1976). Legitimation Crisis. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
  16. Heinrich, M. (1999). Die Wissenschaft vom Wert: Die Marxsche Kritik der politischen Ökonomie zwischen wissenschaftlicher Revolution und klassischer Tradition, überarbeitete und erweiterte Neuauflage. Münster: Westfälisches Dampfboot.Google Scholar
  17. Heinrich, M. (2012). An Introduction to the Three Volumes of Karl Marx’s Capital. New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
  18. Heinrich, M. (2013a). Crisis Theory, the Law of the Tendency of the Profit Rate to Fall, and Marx’s Studies in the 1870s. Monthly Review, 64(11), 15–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Heinrich, M. (2013b). Marx’ Ökonomiekritik nach der MEGA: Eine Zwischenblianz nach dem Abschluss der II. Abteilung. In Marx-Engels-Jahrbuch 2012/13 (pp. 144–167). Berlin: Akademie Verlag.Google Scholar
  20. Kliman, A. (2012). Failure of the Capitalist Production. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
  21. Konishi, K. (2014). Shihonshugi no Seijyuku to Tenkan [The Maturity and Transformation of Capitalism]. Tokyo: Sakurai Shoten.Google Scholar
  22. Kovel, J. (2007). The Enemy of Nature: The End of Capitalism or the End of the World? (2nd ed.). London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  23. Kurz, R. (1995). Die Himmelfahrt des Geldes: Struktuelle Schranken der Kapitalverwertung, Kasinokapitalismus und globale Finanzkrise. Krisis, 16/17, 21–76.Google Scholar
  24. Lebowitz, M. A. (2005). Following Marx: Method, Critique and Crisis. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
  25. Löwy, M. (2015). Ecosocialism: A Radical Alternative to Capitalist Catastrophe. Chicago: Haymarket Books.Google Scholar
  26. Luxemburg, R. (2003). The Accumulation of Capital. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  27. Marx, K. [1858] (1973). Grundrisse: Foundations of the Critique of Political Economy (Rough Draft). New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  28. Marx, K. [1867] (1976). Capital: A Critique of Political Economy (Vol. 1). New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  29. Marx, K. [1885] (1978). Capital: A Critique of Political Economy (Vol. 2). New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  30. Marx, K. (2015). Marx’s Economic Manuscript of 1864–1865. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
  31. Marx, K., & Engels, F. (1975a–). Gesamtausgabe. Section I–IV. Berlin: Dietz Verlag/Akademie Verlag/De Gruyter.Google Scholar
  32. Marx, K., & Engels, F. (1975b–2004). Collected Works (50 Vols). New York: International Publishers.Google Scholar
  33. Miyata, K. (2011). Ippanteki Rijyunritsu no Keikoteki Teika Hosoku to Kyoko [The Law of the Tendential Fall in the General Rate of Profit and Crisis]. Political Economy Quarterly, 48(1), 60–71.Google Scholar
  34. Moore, J. W. (2015). Capitalism in the Web of Life: Ecology and the Accumulation of Capital. New York: Verso.Google Scholar
  35. O’Connor, J. (1998). Natural Causes: Essays in Ecological Marxism. New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  36. Okishio, N. (1961). Technical Changes and the Rate of Profit. Kobe Economic Review, 7, 85–99.Google Scholar
  37. Perelman, M. (1987). Marx’s Crises Theory: Scarcity, Labor, and Finance. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
  38. Roberts, M. (2016). The Long Depression: Marxism and the Global Crisis of Capitalism. Chicago: Haymarket Books.Google Scholar
  39. Robinson, J. (1942). An Essay on Marxian Economics. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  40. Rosdolsky, R. (1977). The Making of Marx’s Capital. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
  41. Roth, R. (2002). The Author Marx and His Editor Engels: Different Views on Volume 3 of Capital. Rethinking Marxism, 14(4), 59–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Saito, K. (2016a). Natur gegen Kapital. Marx’ Ökologie in seiner unvollendeten Kritik des Kapitalismus. Frankfurt am Main: Campus.Google Scholar
  43. Saito, K. (2016b). Marx’s Ecological Notebooks. Monthly Review, 67(9), 25–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Shaikh, A. (1978). Political Economy and Capitalism: Notes on Dobb’s Theory of Crisis. Cambridge Journal of Economics 2(2), 233–251.Google Scholar
  45. Stedman Jones, G. (2016). Karl Marx: Greatness and Illusion. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Sweezy, P. (1942). The Theory of Capitalist Development: Principles of Marxian Political Economy. London: D. Dobson.Google Scholar
  47. Tugan-Baranowsky, M. (1905). Theoretische Grundlagen der Marxismus. Leipzig: Duncker & Humblot.Google Scholar
  48. Vollgraf, C. E. (2016). Marx über die sukzessive Untergrabung des Stoffwechsels der Gesellschaft bei entfalteter kapitalistischer Massenproduktion. In Beiträge zur Marx-Engels-Forschung Neue Folge 2014/15 (pp. 106–132). Hamburg: Argument Verlag.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kohei Saito
    • 1
  1. 1.Osaka City University, Department of EconomicsOsakaJapan

Personalised recommendations