From Media Governance to ICT Governance

  • Daeho Kim
Chapter

Abstract

Over the last few years, there has been an increasing demand for expansion from media governance to ICT governance, as media was not seen as media alone but rather in the framework of ICT. The horizontal governance model was introduced from a layered regulatory model. In Europe, a horizontal regulatory system based on the layer model was institutionalized. The new Korean government sought to promote the change in the ICT governance system through the reorganization of the Ministry of Science, ICT, and Future Planning and the KCC. The dual ministry was the result of an attempt to balance public interest protection and industry growth. Nevertheless, civil society expressed concerns regarding the inclusion of media in ICT governance.

Reference I

Reference II (In Korean)

  1. Bauer, J. 2010. Regulation, Public Policy, and Investment in Communications Infrastructure. Telecommunications Policy 34 (1–2): 65–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Commission of the European Communities. 2005. Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council Amending Council Directive 89/552/EEC on the Coordination of Certain Provisions Laid Down by Law, Regulation or Administrative Action in Member States Concerning the Pursuit of Television Broadcasting Activities. Brussels: European Commission.Google Scholar
  3. Mindel, J., and D. Sicker. 2006. Leveraging the EU Regulatory Framework to Improve a Layered Policy Model for US Telecommunications Markets. Telecommunications Policy 30 (2)): 136–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. OECD. 2004. The Implications of Convergence for Regulation of Electronic Communications. Paris: OECD DSTI/ICCP/TISP.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Randolf, J.M., et al. 2005. Digital Age Communications Act (DACA): Proposal of the Regulatory Framework Working Group (Release 1.0). The Progress and Freedom Foundation.Google Scholar
  6. Whitt, R. 2003. A Horizontal Leap Forward: Formulating a New Public Policy Framework Based on the Network Layered Model. Federal Communications Law Journal 56: 587–672.Google Scholar
  7. Hankyoreh Newspaper. 2013.2.6. Seoul.Google Scholar
  8. Hwang, J.S. and J.S. Song. 2004. Future of Information and Telecommunications Policy: Convergence Policy Perspective Based on Layered Model. In Telecommunications Market, vol. 56. Seoul: KT Management Institute.Google Scholar
  9. JoongAng Daily Newspaper. 2009.5.11, 2009.10.31, 2013.2.14. Seoul.Google Scholar
  10. KBS. 2007, 2010, 2013. Report for the Inspection of State Administration. Seoul: National Assembly of Korea.Google Scholar
  11. Kim, D.H. 2007. Issues of Horizontal Regulatory System Applicable for the Convergence of Broadcasting and Telecommunications. International Telecommunications Policy Review 14 (1): 19–43.Google Scholar
  12. Kim, D.H. 2012. Shift and Prospect of ICT Governance System. Presented at the Korean Association for Broadcasting and Telecommunications Studies Seminar.Google Scholar
  13. Kim, H.K., et al. 2009. New Paradigm for Social Integration in the 21th Century and ICT Based Social Integration Strategy. Seoul: National Information Society Agency.Google Scholar
  14. National Information Society Agency. 2012. Future of Smart Era. Seoul: National Information Society Agency.Google Scholar
  15. Network Neutrality Users Forum. 2013. Opinions of Network Neutrality Users Forum for the Government Organization Reshuffle, February 5. Seoul.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Daeho Kim
    • 1
  1. 1.Inha UniversityIncheonKorea (Republic of)

Personalised recommendations