Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Primary Teachers’ Semiotic Praxis: Windows into the Handling of Division Tasks

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Signs of Signification

Part of the book series: ICME-13 Monographs ((ICME13Mo))

  • 618 Accesses

Abstract

The teaching of division is a complex task: division is difficult to teach in a connected and coherent way, given the diversity of models of division, and differences in their associated actions and utterances. This chapter focuses on the signs produced by teachers in their attempts to explain division. The signs produced follow from unifications between signifiers and signifieds located within what we are calling signification pathways. Our focus is on signification pathways that are co-produced by teachers and learners, and endorsed by the teacher. The data presented in this chapter exemplify categories within an emerging analytical framework of signification pathways when teaching division, which vary in the coherence of the signs that are involved. In this chapter we consider the possibilities and constraints of these signification pathways in relation to the semiotic system related to division from a mathematical interpretant perspective. The analysis makes visible limitations, ambiguity and incoherence across the signification pathways. The conclusion examines how the production of signs and the connection of signs in the signification pathway may lead to certain meanings about division that the teacher endorses as valuable in the teaching of division.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adler, J., & Venkat, H. (2014). Teachers’ mathematical discourse in instruction. In H. Venkat, M. Rollnick, J. Loughran, & M. Askew (Eds.), Exploring mathematics and science teachers’ knowledge (pp. 132–146). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anghileri, J. (1995a). Making sense of symbols. In J. Anghileri (Ed.), Children’s mathematical thinking in the primary years (pp. 74–91). London, UK: Cassell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anghileri, J. (1995b). Negotiating meanings for division. Mathematics in School, 24(2), 2–4. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/30215145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arzarello, F. (2006). Semiosis as a multimodal process. RELIME. Revista latinoamericana de investigaciĂłn en matemática educativa, 9(1), 267–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Askew, M. (2015). Transforming primary mathematics: Understanding classroom tasks, tools and talk. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Askew, M., Venkat, H., & Mathews, C. (2012, July). Coherence and consistency in South African primary mathematics lessons. In Proceedings of the 36th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 2, pp. 27–34). Taipei, Taiwan: PME.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, T. P., Fennema, E., Franke, M. L., Levi, L., & Empson, S. B. (1999). Children’s mathematics: Cognitively guided instruction: ERIC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cobb, P., Gravemeijer, K., Yackel, E., McClain, K., & Whitenack, J. (1997). Mathematizing and symbolizing: The emergence of chains of signification in one first-grade classroom. In D. Kirshner, & Whitson, J. A. (Ed.), Social, semiotic, and psychological perspectives (pp. 151–233). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ernest, P. (2006). A semiotic perspective of mathematical activity: The case of number. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 61(1–2), 67–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischbein, E., Deri, M., Nello, M. S., & Marino, M. S. (1985). The role of implicit models in solving verbal problems in multiplication and division. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 16(1), 3–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gravemeijer, K. (1997). Solving word problems: A case of modelling? Learning and Instruction, 7(4), 389–397. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(97)00011-X.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirshner, D., & Whitson, J. A. (1997). Situated cognition: Social, semiotic, and psychological perspectives. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathews, C. (2014). Teaching division: The importance of coherence in what is made available to learn. In H. Venkat, M. Rollnick, J. Loughran, & M. Askew (Eds.), Exploring mathematics and science teachers’ knowledge (pp. 84–95). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathews, C. (2016). The teaching of division across grades 3 and 4—Disruptions to coherence. Unpublished Ph.D. research report. Johannesburg: University of the Witwatersrand.

    Google Scholar 

  • Presmeg, N. (1998). Ethnomathematics in teacher education. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 1(3), 317–339.

    Google Scholar 

  • Presmeg, N. (2006). Semiotics and the “connections” standard: Significance of semiotics for teachers of mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 61(1–2), 163–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Presmeg, N., Radford, L., Roth, W.-M., & Kadunz, G. (Eds.). (2016). Semiotics in mathematics education. Hamburg: Springer Open.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radford, L. (2010). Algebraic thinking from a cultural semiotic perspective. Research in Mathematics Education, 12(1), 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radford, L., Schubring, G., & Seeger, F. (2008). Semiotics in mathematics education. Epistemology, history, classroom, and culture. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sfard, A. (2008). Thinking as communicating: Human development, the growth of discourses, and mathematizing. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tirosh, D., & Graeber, A. O. (1991). The effect of problem type and common misconceptions on preservice elementary teachers’ thinking about division. School Science and Mathematics, 91(4), 157–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venkat, H., & Naidoo, D. (2012). Analyzing coherence for conceptual learning in a Grade 2 numeracy lesson. Education as Change, 16(1), 21–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/16823206.2012.691686.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. (1979). Consciousness as a problem in the psychology of behavior. Soviet Psychology, 17(4), 3–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walkerdine, V. (1988). The mastery of reason: Cognitive development and the production of rationality. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, A., & Mason, J. (2005). Mathematics as a constructive activity: The role of learner generated examples. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of the Witwatersrand (WITS), Private Bag 3, 2050, Johannesburg, South Africa

    Corin Mathews, Hamsa Venkat & Mike Askew

Authors
  1. Corin Mathews
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hamsa Venkat
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mike Askew
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Corin Mathews .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Illinois State University , MARYVILLE, Tennessee, USA

    Norma Presmeg

  2. Faculty of Education, Université Laurentienne Faculty of Education, Sudbury, Ontario, Canada

    Luis Radford

  3. Faculty of Education, University of Victoria Faculty of Education, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada

    Wolff-Michael Roth

  4. Fakultät für technische Wissenschaften, Institut für Mathematik, Alpen-Adria-Universität Klagenfurt, Klagenfurt, Austria

    Gert Kadunz

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Mathews, C., Venkat, H., Askew, M. (2018). Primary Teachers’ Semiotic Praxis: Windows into the Handling of Division Tasks. In: Presmeg, N., Radford, L., Roth, WM., Kadunz, G. (eds) Signs of Signification. ICME-13 Monographs. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70287-2_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70287-2_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-70286-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-70287-2

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation