Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Serendipity by Design? How to Turn from Diversity Exposure to Diversity Experience to Face Filter Bubbles in Social Media

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Internet Science (INSCI 2017)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 10673))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Personalization of online content creates filter bubbles and reinforces echo chambers. These are driven not only by natural human behaviours but also by design choices and efficiency-driven recommender systems. The traditional media policy goal of exposing citizens to diverse information to protect pluralism has not found its concrete application on social media. As the usage of social media as a news source increases, as well as personalization’ sophistication and group polarization, there is a need for preventing audience fragmentation. The paper suggests serendipity as a potential design principle and, eventually, policy goal. Indeed, serendipity – considered both as a capability and a process of seeking and processing unexpected and valuable information – requires diverse information as a precondition and it causes cognitive diversity. Serendipity as a design principle might encompass fundamental phases of production and consumption of information, representing a positive freedom valuable from an epistemological, psychological and political perspective. With serendipity being both limited and cultivated in the digital environment, the research reveals a theoretical trade-off between relevance and serendipity (or unknown relevance) that might be tackled with serendipity-driven recommender systems and structural and informational nudging. Such approach could turn the media policy goal of exposing users to diverse information towards an experience of diversity that comes through an architecture for serendipity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Floridi, L.: The Fourth Revolution: How the Infosphere is Reshaping Human Reality. OUP Oxford, Oxford (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Thurman, N.: Making ‘The Daily Me’: technology, economics and habit in the mainstream assimilation of personalized news. Journalism 12(4), 395–415 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Sunstein, C.R.: # Republic: Divided Democracy in the Age of Social Media. Princeton University Press, Princeton (2017)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  4. Pariser, E.: The Filter Bubble: How the New Personalized Web is Changing What We Read and How We Think. Penguin, Westminster (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bozdag, E., Timmermans E.: Values in the filter bubble ethics of personalization algorithms in cloud computing. In: 1st International Workshop on Values in Design–Building Bridges between RE, HCI and Ethics (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lazarsfeld, P.F., Berelson, B., Gondel, H.: The People’s Choice, New York, Duell, Sloan, Pearce (1944)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Sunstein, C.R.: Going to Extremes: How Like Minds Unite and Divide. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Wojcieszak, M.: ‘Don’t talk to me’: effects of ideologically homogeneous online groups and politically dissimilar offline ties on extremism. New Media Soc. 12(4), 637–655 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Vicario, M., Bessi, A., Zollo, F., Petroni, F., Scala, A., Caldarelli, G., Quattrociocchi, W.: The spreading of misinformation online. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 113(3), 554–559 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Gazoia, A.: Senza filtro. Chi controlla l’informazione. Minimum Fax (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Wojcieszak, M.E., Mutz, D.C.: Online groups and political discourse: do online discussion spaces facilitate exposure to political disagreement? J. Commun. 59(1), 40–56 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Bakshy, E., Messing, S., Adamic, L.A.: Exposure to ideologically diverse news and opinion on Facebook. Science 348(6239), 1130–1132 (2015)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Bozdag, E., van den Hoven, J.: Breaking the filter bubble: democracy and design. Ethics Inf. Technol. 17(4), 249–265 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. O’Hara, K., Stevens, D.: Echo chambers and online radicalism: assessing the internet’s complicity in violent extremism. Policy Internet 7(4), 401–422 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Zuiderveen Borgesius, F.J., Trilling, D., Moeller, J., Bodó, B., De Vreese, C.H., Helberger, N.: Should we worry about filter bubbles? Internet Policy Rev. J. Internet Regul. 5(1), 1–16 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Fletcher, R., Nielsen, R.K.: Are news audiences increasingly fragmented? a cross‐national comparative analysis of cross‐platform news audience fragmentation and duplication. J. Commun. (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Quattrociocchi, W., Scala, A., Sunstein, C.R.: Echo chambers on Facebook. In: Harvard Law Review (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Sunstein, C.R., Vermeule, A.: Conspiracy theories: causes and cures. J. Polit. Philos. 17(2), 202–227 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Xing, X., Meng, W., Doozan, D., Feamster, N., Lee, W., Snoeren, Alex C.: Exposing inconsistent web search results with bobble. In: Faloutsos, M., Kuzmanovic, A. (eds.) PAM 2014. LNCS, vol. 8362, pp. 131–140. Springer, Cham (2014). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-04918-2_13

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. Semaan, B.C., Robertson, S.P., Douglas, S., Maruyama, M.: Social media supporting political deliberation across multiple public spheres: towards depolarization. In: Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing, pp. 1409–1421. ACM (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Liao, Q.V., Fu, W.T.: Can you hear me now?: mitigating the echo chamber effect by source position indicators. In: Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing, pp. 184–196. ACM (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Helberger, N.: Diversity by design. J. Inf. Policy 1, 441–469 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Hoffmann, C.P., Lutz, C., Meckel, M., Ranzini, G.: Diversity by choice: applying a social cognitive perspective to the role of public service media in the digital age. Int. J. Commun. 9(1), 1360–1381 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Helberger, N., Karppinen, K., D’Acunto, L.: Exposure diversity as a design principle for recommender systems. In: Information, Communication & Society, pp. 1–17 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Hildebrandt, M., Koops, B.J.: The challenges of ambient law and legal protection in the profiling era. Modern Law Rev. 73(3), 428–460 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Hildebrandt, M.: Legal protection by design: objections and refutations. Legisprudence 5(2), 223–248 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Friedman, B.: Value-Sensitive Des. Interact. 3(6), 16–23 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Floridi, L.: Tolerant paternalism: pro-ethical design as a resolution of the dilemma of toleration. Sci. Eng. Ethics 22(6), 1669–1688 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Helberger, N., Klein-von Königslöw, K., van der Noll, R.: Convergence, information intermediaries and media pluralism—Mapping the legal, social, and economic issues at hand. A quick scan. Institute for Information Law, Research report (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Lerman, K., Yan, X., Wu, X.-Z.: The “majority illusion” in social networks. PLoS ONE11(2), e0147617 (2016). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0147617

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Helberger, N.: Public service media merely facilitating or actively stimulating diverse media choices? public service media at the crossroad. Int. J. Commun. 9, 17 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Semaan, B.C., Robertson, S.P., Douglas, S., Maruyama, M.: Social media supporting political deliberation across multiple public spheres: towards depolarization. In: Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing, pp. 1409–1421. ACM (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Matt, C., Benlian, A., Hess, T., Weiß, C.: Escaping from the Filter Bubble? The Effects of Novelty and Serendipity on Users’ Evaluations of Online Recommendations (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Race, T., Makri, S.: Accidental Information Discovery: Cultivating Serendipity in the Digital Age. Chandos Publishing, Oxford (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Kotkov, D., Wang, S., Veijalainen, J.: A survey of serendipity in recommender systems. Knowl.-Based Syst. 111, 180–192 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Corneli, J., Pease, A., Colton, S., Jordanous, A., Guckelsberger, C.: Modelling serendipity in a computational context (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Merton, R.K., Barber, E.: The Travels and Adventures of Serendipity: A Study in Sociological Semantics and the Sociology of Science. Princeton University Press, Princeton (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  38. McCay-Peet, L., Toms, E.G.: Proposed Facets of a Serendipitous Digital Environment (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Boden, M.A.: The Creative Mind: Myths and Mechanisms. Psychology Press, Hove (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  40. de Rond, M.: The structure of serendipity. Cult. Organ. 20(5), 342–358 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. McBirnie, A.: Seeking serendipity: the paradox of control. In: Roberts, S.A. (Ed.), Aslib Proceedings, vol. 60(6), 600–618. Emerald Group Publishing Limited (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Edward Foster, A., Ellis, D.: Serendipity and its study. J. Doc. 70(6), 1015–1038 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Wright, C.: Stumbling and sharing: smartphones and serendipity in online news encounters. University of Missouri-Columbia (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  44. Dunbar, K., Fugelsang, J.: Scientific thinking and reasoning. In: The Cambridge Handbook of Thinking and Reasoning, pp. 705–725 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  45. Campanario, J.M.: Using citation classics to study the incidence of serendipity in scientific discovery. Scieontometrics 37(1), 3–24 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Melo, R., Carvalhais, M.: Regarding value in digital serendipitous interactions. J. Sci. Technol. Arts 8(2), 37–44 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Sawaizumi, S., Katai, O., Kawakami, H., Shiose, T.: Using the concept of serendipity in education (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  48. Negroponte, N.: Being digital. Vintage, New York (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  49. Gup, T.: Technology and the end of serendipity. Chronicle High. Educ. 44(21), A52 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  50. Abbott, A.: The traditional future: a computational theory of library research. College Res. Libr. 69(6), 524–545 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Meckel, M.: “SOS – SAVE OUR SERENDIPITY”, Personal Blog, 11 October 2011. http://www.miriammeckel.de/2011/10/11/sos-save-our-serendipity/?goback=%2Egde_1975471_member_112072885

  52. Zuckerman, E.: Rewire: digital cosmopolitans in the age of connection (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  53. Gabriel, Y., Muhr, S.L., Linstead, S.: Luck of the draw? serendipity, accident, chance and misfortune in organization and design (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  54. Makri, S., Blandford, A.: Coming across information serendipitously - Part 1, Process Model J. Doc. 68(5), 684–705 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  55. Green, D.: The Serendipity Machine. A Voyage of Discovery Through the Unexpected World of Computers. CreateSpace, Paramount (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  56. Thurman, N., Schifferes, S.: The future of personalization at news websites: lessons from a longitudinal study. J. Stud. 13(5–6), 775–790 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  57. Dantonio, L., Makri, S., Blandford, A.: Coming across academic social media content serendipitously. Proc. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 49(1), 1–10 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Gibson, J.J.: The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception: Classic Edition. Psychology Press (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  59. Domingos, P.: The Master Algorithm: How the Quest for the Ultimate Learning Machine Will Remake Our World. Basic Books, New York (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  60. Ziegler, C.N., McNee, S.M., Konstan, J.A., Lausen, G.: Improving recommendation lists through topic diversification. In: Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on World Wide Web, pp. 22–32. ACM (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  61. Ge, M., Delgado-Battenfeld, C., Jannach, D.: Beyond accuracy: evaluating recommender systems by coverage and serendipity. In: Proceedings of the Fourth ACM Conference on Recommender Systems, pp. 257–260. ACM (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  62. Zhang, Y.C., Séaghdha, D.Ó., Quercia, D., Jambor, T.: Auralist: introducing serendipity into music recommendation. In: Proceedings of the Fifth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining, pp. 13–22. ACM, ISO 690 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  63. André, P., Teevan, J., Dumais, S.T.: Discovery is never by chance: designing for (Un) serendipity. In: Proceedings of the Seventh ACM Conference on Creativity and Cognition, pp. 305–314. ACM (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  64. Herlocker, J.L., Konstan, J.A., Terveen, L.G., Riedl, J.T.: Evaluating collaborative filtering recommender systems. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. (TOIS) 22(1), 5–53 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Campos, J., Figueiredo, A.D.: The Serendipity Equations. Navy Center for Applied Research in Artificial Intelligence, Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, DC, Technical note AIC-01–003 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  66. Campos, J., Figueiredo, A.D.: Programming for serendipity. In: Proceedings of the AAAI Fall Symposium on Chance Discovery – The Discovery and Management of Chance Events (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  67. Campos, J.M.M., De Figueiredo, A.C.D.: U.S. Patent No. 7,319,998. Washington, DC: U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  68. Erdelez, S.: Information encountering: it’s more than just bumping into information. Bull. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 25(3), 26–29 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Bogers, T., Björneborn, L.: Micro-serendipity: meaningful coincidences in everyday life shared on Twitter. iConference 2013, pp. 196–208 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  70. Williamson, K.: Discovered by chance: the role of incidental information acquisition in an ecological model of information use. Lib. Inf. Sci. Res. 20(1), 23–40 (1998)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  71. Loepp, B., Hussein, T., Ziegler, J.: Choice-Based Preference Elicitation for Collaborative Filtering Recommender Systems (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  72. Nagulendra, S., Vassileva, J.: Understanding and controlling the filter bubble through interactive visualization: a user study. In: Proceedings of the 25th ACM Conference on Hypertext and Social Media, pp. 107–115. ACM (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  73. Nagulendra, S., Vassileva, J.: Providing awareness, explanation and control of personalized filtering in a social networking site. Inf. Syst. Front. 18(1), 145–158 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Munson, S.A., Lee, S.Y., Resnick, P.: Encouraging Reading of Diverse Political Viewpoints with a Browser Widget. In: ICWSM (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  75. Kirkpatrick, M.: Facebook’s Zuckerberg says the age of privacy is over, p. 198 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  76. Verbert, K., Manouselis, N., Ochoa, X., Wolpers, M., Drachsler, H., Bosnic, I., Duval, E.: Context-aware recommender systems for learning: a survey and future challenges. IEEE Trans. Learn. Technol. 5(4), 318–335 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Carr, P.L.: Serendipity in the stacks: libraries, information architecture, and the problems of accidental discovery. Coll. Res. Libr. 76(6), 831–842 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Makri, S., Bhuiya, J., Carthy, J., Owusu-Bonsu, J.: Observing serendipity in digital information environments. Proc. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 52(1), 1–10 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Dantonio, L., Makri, S., Blandford, A.: Coming across academic social media content serendipitously. Proc. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 49(1), 1–10 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. Asghar, H.M.: Measuring information seeking through Facebook: scale development and initial evidence of information seeking in Facebook scale (ISFS). Comput. Hum. Behav. 52, 259–270 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. Sun, T., Zhang, M., Mei, Q.: Unexpected relevance: an empirical study of serendipity in Retweets. In: ICWSM (2013)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research is funded by the ERASMUS MUNDUS program LAST-JD, Law, Science and Technology coordinated by University of Bologna.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. LAST-JD International Joint Doctorate in Law, Science and Technology, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy

    Urbano Reviglio

Authors
  1. Urbano Reviglio
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Urbano Reviglio .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. CERTH, Information Technologies Institute, Thessaloniki, Greece

    Ioannis Kompatsiaris

  2. University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom

    Jonathan Cave

  3. CERTH, Information Technologies Institute, Thessaloniki, Greece

    Anna Satsiou

  4. Technical University Munich, Garching, Germany

    Georg Carle

  5. T6 Ecosystems, Rome, Italy

    Antonella Passani

  6. CERTH, Information Technologies Institute, Thessaloniki, Greece

    Efstratios Kontopoulos

  7. CERTH, Information Technologies Institute, Thessaloniki, Greece

    Sotiris Diplaris

  8. Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden

    Donald McMillan

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Reviglio, U. (2017). Serendipity by Design? How to Turn from Diversity Exposure to Diversity Experience to Face Filter Bubbles in Social Media. In: Kompatsiaris, I., et al. Internet Science. INSCI 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10673. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70284-1_22

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70284-1_22

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-70283-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-70284-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation