Abstract
In June 2014 the Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education (QAA) and the Higher Education Academy (HEA) published their education for sustainable development guidance for higher education. The guidance is a tool for supporting educators in embedding or including knowledge, understanding and awareness of sustainable development across the curriculum by identifying graduate learning outcomes and outlining approaches to teaching, learning and assessment. The purpose of the guidance is to help higher education institutions in training sustainability literate graduates who will contribute to an environmentally and ethically responsible society through the application of their skills, knowledge and experience. The guidance is now some 30 months old, which leads us to pose the question: to what extent has the UK higher education sector adopted and implemented the guidance in its curricula? A systematic web-based analysis has been performed of 139 higher education institutions’ websites to identify the use of the guidance in the public web environments of UK higher education, especially regarding the design, delivery and review of curricula. To what extent do UK universities reference the role of ESD or the guidance in the specification of the graduate learning outcomes and the approaches to teaching, learning and assessment? In analysing the web environments for guidance related content we have also identified the presence of general information relating to estates sustainability and to general ESD concepts. In presenting the results a comparison is made between institutions, which contributed to the guidance and the rest of the sector. The analysis shows that 120 institutions provide information about estate sustainability, 82 general information on ESD, but only 16 institutions make public statements about their use of the QAA and HEA guidance for ESD. As such, this study provides the first comprehensive assessment of the presence of sustainability, and specifically ESD and the QAA and HEA guidance, in the online platforms of universities and colleges. This paper will share the results of the study with the UK higher education sector and in so doing hopes to encourage HEIs to engage with ESD by integrating it in their curricula.
Notes
- 1.
Searchability is reflected here as the level of accessibility of the information, which could range from easy to find to hidden information.
References
Armstrong CM (2011) Implementing education for sustainable development: the potential use of time-honored pedagogical practice from the progressive era of education. J Sustain Educ 2:1–25
Bauer C, Scharl A (2000) Quantitative evaluation of Web site content and structure. Internet Res 10(1):31–44
Binsbergen J (2013) Quantitative content analysis. https://www.digitalmethods.net/MoM/QuantContentAnalysis. Last accessed 9 Jan 2016
Bowen GA (2009) Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qual Res J 9(2):27–40
Briggs S, Wilson A (2007) Which university? A study of the influence of cost and information factors on Scottish undergraduate choice. J High Educ Policy and Manage 29(1):52–72
Chapleo C, Carrillo Durán MV, Castillo Díaz A (2011) Do UK universities communicate their brands effectively through their websites? J Mark High Educ 21(1):25–46
Dale A, Newman L (2005) Sustainable development, education and literacy. Int J Sustain High Educ 6(4):351–362
Desha C, Hargroves C (2014) Higher education and sustainable development: a model for curriculum renewal. Routledge, London, p 268p
Drayson R, Bone E, Agombar J, Kemp S (2012) Student attitudes towards and skills for sustainable development. York: Higher Education Academy. http://www.heacademy.ac.uk/assets/documents/esd/Student_attitudes_towards_and_skills_for_sustainable_development.pdf. Last accessed 8 Feb 2016
EAUC (n.d.) Four universities join elite Russell Group. Environmental Association for Universities and Colleges. http://www.eauc.org.uk/four_universities_join_elite_russell_group. Last accessed 7 Nov 2016
Everett J (2008) Sustainability in higher education: Implications for the disciplines. Theory and Res Educ 6(2):237–251
Ferrer-Balas D, Lozano R, Huisingh D, Buckland H, Ysern P, Zilahy G (2010) Going beyond the rhetoric: system-wide changes in universities for sustainable societies. J Clean Prod 18(7):607–610
Fielding N, Lee RM, Blank G (2008) The SAGE handbook of online research methods. SAGE publications, London, p 684p
Global Tolerance (2015) “The values revolution”. Global tolerance. http://www.globaltolerance.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/GT-Values-Revolution-Report.pdf. Last accessed 18 Jan 2017
Hannover Research (2014) Trends in higher education marketing, recruitment, and technology. http://www.hanoverresearch.com/media/Trends-in-Higher-Education-Marketing-Recruitment-and-Technology-2.pdf. Last accessed 18 Jan 2017
Hazelkorn E (2015) Rankings and the reshaping of higher education: the battle for world-class excellence. Springer, London, p 270p
HEA (n.d.) “Green academy”. Higher education academy. https://www.heacademy.ac.uk/workstreams-research/themes/education-sustainable-development/green-academy. Last accessed 11 Jan 2017
HEA (2014) “Students want more on sustainable development on their higher education careers.” Higher Education Academy. https://www.heacademy.ac.uk/about/news/students-want-more-sustainable-development-their-higher-education-careers. Last accessed 11 Jan 2017
HEFCE (2013) “Students’ Green fund.” Higher Education Founding Council for England. http://www.hefce.ac.uk/news/newsarchive/2013/Name,93911,en.html. Last accessed 19 Jan 2017
HEFCE (2014) “Sustainable development in higher education: HEFCE’s role to date and a framework for its future actions.” Higher Education Funding Council for England, http://www.hefce.ac.uk/pubs/year/2014/201430/. Last accessed 11 Jan 2017
Lambrechts W, Mulà I, Ceulemans K, Molderez I, Gaeremynck V (2013) The integration of competences for sustainable development in higher education: an analysis of bachelor programs in management. J Clean Prod 48:65–73
Martin S, Jucker R (2005) Educating earth-literate leaders. J Geogr High Educ 29(1):19–29
NBS (2013) “Three reasons job seekers prefer sustainable companies”. Network for business sustainability. http://nbs.net/knowledge/three-reasons-job-seekers-prefer-sustainable-companies/. Last accessed 18 Jan 2017
Orr D (1991) “What is education for?” Context, 27, 53, 52–s58. People and Planet (n.d.) How sustainable is your university?
People and Planet. https://peopleandplanet.org/university-league. Last accessed 27 Jan 2017
QAA and HEA (2014) “Education for sustainable development: guidance for UK higher education providers.” Quality Assurance Agency and Higher Education Academy, http://www.qaa.ac.uk/en/Publications/Documents/Education-sustainable-development-Guidance-June-14.pdf. Last accessed 8 Feb 2016
Schreier M (2014) Qualitative content analysis. The SAGE handbook of qualitative data analysis, Sage, London, pp 170–183
Shephard K, Dulgar P (2015) Why it matters how we frame ‘Education’ in education for sustainable development. Appl Environ Educ Commun 14(3):137–148
Sterling S, Maxey L, Luna H (2013) The sustainable university: progress and prospects. Routledge, London, p 334
Su HJ, Chang TC (2010) Sustainability of higher education institutions in Taiwan. Int J Sustain High Educ 11(2):163–172
Tilbury D (2011) Higher education for sustainability: a global overview of commitment and progress. High Educ World 4:18–28
UK National Commission for UNESCO (2013) “Education for Sustainable Development (ESD) in the UK—Current status, best practice and opportunities for the future”, UK National Commission for UNESCO. http://www.unesco.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/Brief-9-ESD-March-2013.pdf. Last accessed 11 Jan 2017
Waas T, Verbruggen A, Wright T (2010) University research for sustainable development: definition and characteristics explored. J Clean Prod 18(7):629–636
Yarime M, Tanaka Y (2012) The issues and methodologies in sustainability assessment tools for higher education institutions a review of recent trends and future challenges. J Educ Sustain Dev 6(1):63–77
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Fiselier, E.S., Longhurst, J.W.S. (2018). A Critical Evaluation of the Representation of the QAA and HEA Guidance on ESD in Public Web Environments of UK Higher Education Institutions. In: Leal Filho, W. (eds) Implementing Sustainability in the Curriculum of Universities. World Sustainability Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70281-0_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70281-0_14
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-70280-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-70281-0
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)