Abstract
Learning environments are highly influential on creative processes, and many educational psychologists have suggested that environments have the power to make or break the creative potential of students. A learning environment designed to support creativity offers opportunities for divergent thinking and innovative solutions, with an overall atmosphere that fosters communication, collaboration, and risk-taking. The SCALE (Support for Creativity in a Learning Environment) is an evaluation instrument designed to evaluate the creative potential of learning environments. SCALE was created based on an extensive literature review, classroom observations, and administrator/educator/researcher collaborative design and consists of 14 items in three categories that were identified as foundational to supporting student creativity: Learner Engagement, Physical Environment, and Learning Climate. We hope that SCALE and other such instruments can allow for the identification and development of environments more suited for creativity.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context. Boulder, CO: Westview Press Harper Collins Publishers.
Candy, P. C. (2004). Linking thinking. Self-directed learning in the digital age. Canberra: Australian Government, Department of Education, Science and Training. Retrieved from http://www.dest.gov.au/research/publications/linking_thinking/default.htm.
Caper, R. (1996). Play, experimentation and creativity. The International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 77, 859–869.
Chan, S., & Yuen, M. (2014). Personal and environmental factors affecting teachers’ creativity-fostering practices in Hong Kong. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 12, 69–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2014.02.003.
Cress, S. W., & Holm, D. T. (2016). Creative endeavors: Inspiring creativity in a first grade classroom. Early Childhood Education Journal, 44(3), 235–243. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-015-0704-7.
Cropley, A. J. (2003). Creativity in education & learning. Bodmin, Cornwall: Routledge Falmer.
Eckhoff, A. (2011). Creativity in the early childhood classroom: Perspectives of preservice teachers. Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education, 32(3), 240–255. https://doi.org/10.1080/10901027.2011.594486.
Fischer, G., & Scharff, E. (1998). Learning technologies in support of self-directed learning. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 98(4), 1–32.
Florida, R. (2002). The rise of the creative class and how it’s transforming work, leisure, community and everyday life. New York: Basic Books.
Forrester, V., & Hui, A. (2007). Creativity in the Hong Kong classroom: What is the contextual practice? Thinking Skills and Creativity, 2(1), 30–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2006.10.003.
Freedman, K. (2007). Artmaking/troublemaking: Creativity, policy, and leadership in art education. Studies in Art Education: A Journal of Issues and Research, 48(2), 204–217.
Fusarelli, L. D. (2004). The potential impact of the no child left behind act on equity and diversity in American education. Educational Policy, 18, 71–94.
Giroux, H. A., & Schmidt, M. (2004). Closing the achievement gap: A metaphor for children left behind. Journal of Educational Change, 5, 213–228.
Guglielmino, L. M. (1977). Development of the self-directed learning readiness scale. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia.
Jerald, C. D. (2009). Center for Public Education. Defining a 21st century education. Retrieved from http://www.centerforpubliceducation.org/Learn-About/21st-Century/Defining-a-21st-CenturyEducaion-Full-Report-PDF.pdf
Mishra, P., Henriksen, D., & The Deep-Play Research Group. (2012). Rethinking technology & creativity in the 21st century: On being in-disciplined. TechTrends, 56(6), 18–21.
Mishra, P., Koehler, M. J., & Henriksen, D. (2011). The seven trans-disciplinary habits of mind: Extending the tpack framework towards 21st century learning. Educational Technology, 11(2), 22–28.
Olivant, K. F. (2015). “I am not a format”: Teachers’ experiences with fostering creativity in the era of accountability. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 29(1), 115–129. https://doi.org/10.1080/02568543.2014.978920.
Partnership for 21st Century Skills. (2004). Skills framework. From: http://www.21stcenturyskills.org
Peppler, K. A., & Solomou, M. (2011). Building creativity: Collaborative learning and creativity in social media environments. On the Horizon, 19(1), 13–23. https://doi.org/10.1108/10748121111107672.
Pink, D. H. (2005). A whole new mind. New York: Riverhead Books.
Pink, D. H. (2009). Drive: The surprising truth about what motivates us. New York: Riverhead Books.
Robinson, K. (2003). Mind the gap: The creative conundrum. Critical Quarterly, 43(1), 41–45.
Robinson, K. (2011). Out of our minds. West Sussex: Capstone Publishing.
Root-Bernstein, R. S. (1996). The sciences and arts share a common creative aesthetic. In A. I. Tauber (Ed.), The elusive synthesis: Aesthetics and science (pp. 49–82). Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer.
Root-Bernstein, R. S. (2003). The art of innovation: Polymaths and the universality of the creative process. In L. Shavanina (Ed.), International handbook of innovation (pp. 267–278). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Root-Bernstein, R. S., & Bernstein, M. (1999). Sparks of genius: The thirteen thinking tools of the world’s most creative people. New York: Houghton Mifflin.
Sawyer, K. (2015). A call to action: The challenges of creative teaching and learning. Teachers College Record, 117, 100303.
Wagner, T. (2010). The global achievement gap: Why even our best schools don’t teach the new survival skills our children need--and what we can do about it. New York: Basic Books.
Warner, S. A., & Myers, K. L. (2009). The creative classroom: The role of space and place toward facilitating creativity. The Technology Teacher, 69(4), 28–34.
Zimmerman, B. J. (1990). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: An overview. Educational Psychologist, 25(1), 3–17.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This chapter is edited and derived from the following article, which originally appeared in the journal TechTrends (with permission from the publisher and editor). With thanks and credit to the Deep-Play Research Group and authors as noted below. A special thanks for Carmen Richardson for additional editing of this chapter for the book.
Mishra, P., Fahnoe, C., Henriksen, D., & The Deep-Play Research Group. (2013). Creativity, self-directed learning, and the architecture of technology rich environments. TechTrends, 57(1), 10–13.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 AECT
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Mishra, P., Henriksen, D. (2018). The Architecture of Creative Learning Environments. In: Creativity, Technology & Education: Exploring their Convergence. SpringerBriefs in Educational Communications and Technology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70275-9_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70275-9_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-70274-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-70275-9
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)