Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Climate Change? Exploring the Role of Organisational Climate for Psychological Ownership

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Theoretical Orientations and Practical Applications of Psychological Ownership

Abstract

This chapter will explore the potential role that an organisation’s climate can have on employees’ sense of psychological ownership (PO) and work engagement. Specifically, socio-moral climate (SMC) is a construct of organisational climate based on organisational behaviours, and assumes that workplace practices and procedures, including communication, cooperation, and handling of conflict, can impact employees’ moral attitudes and behaviours. A positive SMC is hypothesized to promote the development of ethical attitudes and value orientations of organisation members, and to foster employees’ identification with the organisation and development of PO. Recent studies of SMC identified increased prosocial and community-oriented behavioural orientations, organisational commitment and innovation, as well as, lower turnover intention and less organisational cynicism as outcomes of SMC.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Avey, J. B., Avolio, B. J., Crossley, C. D., & Luthans, F. (2009). Psychological ownership: Theoretical extensions, measurement and relation to work outcomes. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 30(2), 173–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Avey, J. B., Wernsing, T. S., & Palanski, M. E. (2012). Exploring the process of ethical leadership: The mediating role of employee voice and psychological ownership. Journal of Business Ethics, 107(1), 21–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2008). Towards a model of work engagement. Career Development International, 13(3), 209–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, G., Crossley, C., & Robinson, S. L. (2014). Psychological ownership, territorial behavior, and being perceived as a team contributor: The critical role of trust in the work environment. Personnel Psychology, 67(2), 463–485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chi, N. W., & Han, T. S. (2008). Exploring the linkages between formal ownership and psychological ownership for the organization: The mediating role of organizational justice. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 81(4), 691–711.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christian, M. S., Garza, A. S., & Slaughter, J. E. (2011). Work engagement: A quantitative review and test of its relations with task and contextual performance. Personnel Psychology, 64(1), 89–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cropanzano, R., & Mitchell, M. (2005). Social exchange theory: An interdisciplinary review. Journal of Management, 31(6), 874–900.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conway, J. M., & Lance, C. E. (2010). What reviewers should expect from authors regarding common method bias in organizational research. Journal of Business and Psychology, 25(3), 325–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins, S., Tian, A. W., Newman, A. & Martin, A. (2016). Psychological ownership: A review and research agenda. Journal of Organizational Behavior, online, 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darroch, J., & McNaughton, R. (2002). Examining the link between knowledge management practices and types of innovation. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 3(3), 210–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunford, B. B., Schleicher, D. J., & Zhu. L. (2009). The relative importance of psychological versus pecuniary approaches to establishing an ownership culture. In D. Lewin & B. E. Kaufman (Eds.), Advances in industrial & labor relations (Vol. 16, pp. 1–21).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, R. (2008). Multilevel approaches in organizational settings: Opportunities, challenges and implications for cross-cultural research. In F. J. R. van de Vijver, D. A. van Hemert, & Y. Poortinga (Eds.), Individuals and cultures in multi-level analysis (pp. 73–196). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fried, Y., & Ferris, G. (1987). The validity of the job characteristics model: A review and meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 40(2), 287–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • George, K. (2015). The relationship between psychological ownership, work engagement and happiness (Doctoral dissertation).

    Google Scholar 

  • Glick, W. H. (1985). Conceptualizing and measuring organisational climate and psychological climate: Pitfalls in multilevel research. Academy of Management Review, 10(3), 601–616.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, R. M. (1997). The knowledge-based view of the firm: Implications for management practice. Long Range Planning, 30(3), 450–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gold, A. H., Malhotra, A., & Segars, A. H. (2001). Knowledge management: An organizational capabilities’ perspective. Journal of Management Information Systems, 18(1), 185–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Han, T. S., Chiang, H. H., & Chang, A. (2008). Employee participation in decision making, psychological ownership and knowledge sharing: The mediating role of organizational commitment in Taiwanese high-tech organizations. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 21(10), 2218–2233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Han, T. S., Chiang, H. H., McConville, D., & Chang, A. (2015). A longitudinal investigation of person-organization fit, person-job fit, and contextual performance: The mediating role of psychological ownership. Human Performance, 28(5), 425–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahn, W. A. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of Management Journal, 33(4), 692–724.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohlberg, L. (1984). Moral stages and moralization: The cognitive-developmental approach. In L. Kohlberg (Ed.), Essays on moral development (Vol 2, pp. 170–206). San Francisco, CA: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lempert, W. (1994). Moral development in the biographies of skilled industrial workers. Journal of Moral Education, 23(4), 451–468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, J., Yuan, L., Ning, L., & Li-Ying, J. (2015). Knowledge sharing and affective commitment: The mediating role of psychological ownership. Journal of Knowledge Management, 19(6), 1146–1166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, J., Wang, H., Hui, C., & Lee, C. (2012). Psychological ownership: How having control matters. Journal of Management Studies, 49(5), 869–895.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maslach, C., Schaufeli, W. B., & Leiter, M. (2001). Job burnout. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 397–422.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Matsunaga, M. (2008). Item parceling in structural equation modeling: A primer. Communication Methods and Measures, 2(4), 260–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayhew, M. G., Ashkanasy, N. M., Bramble, T., & Gardner, J. (2007). A study of the antecedents and consequences of psychological ownership in organizational settings. Journal of Social Psychology, 147(5), 477–500.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • O’Driscoll, M. P., Pierce, J. L., & Coghlan, A.-M. (2006). The psychology of ownership: Work environment structure, organizational commitment, and citizenship behaviors. Group and Organization Management, 31(3), 388–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peng, H. (2013). Why and when do people hide knowledge? Journal of Knowledge Management, 17(3), 398–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peng, H., & Pierce, J. (2015). Job- and organization-based psychological ownership: Relationship and outcomes. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 30(2), 151–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pierce, J. L., & Jussila, I. (2010). Collective psychological ownership within the work and organizational context: Construct introduction and elaboration. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31, 810–834.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pierce, J. L., & Jussila, I. (2011). Psychological ownership and the organizational context: Theory, research evidence, and application. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pierce, J. L., Kostova, T., & Dirks, K. T. (2003). The state of psychological ownership: Integrating and extending a century of research. Review of General Psychology, 7(1), 84–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pierce, J. L., O’Driscoll, M. P., & Coghlan, A.-M. (2004). Work environment structure and psychological ownership: The mediating effects of control. Journal of Social Psychology, 144(5), 507–534.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pierce, J. L., Rubenfeld, S. A., & Morgan, S. (1991). Employee ownership: A conceptual model of process and effects. Academy of Management Review, 16, 121–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pircher Verdorfer, A., Steinheider, B., & Burkus, D. (2015). Exploring the socio-moral climate in organizations: An empirical examination of determinants, consequences, and mediating mechanisms. Journal of Business Ethics, 132(1), 233–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pircher Verdorfer, A., Weber, W. G., Unterrainer, C., & Seyr, S. (2013). The socio-moral climate concept: A contribution in exploring effects of the ethical context in organizations. Economic and Industrial Democracy, 34(3), 423–449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poutsma, E., van Eert, C., & Ligthart, P. (2015). Employee ownership and organizational citizenship behavior: High performance ownership systems and the mediating role of psychological ownership. In A. Kauhanen (Ed.), Advances in the economic analysis of participatory & labor-managed firms (Vol, 16, pp. 223–248). Bingley: United Kingdom: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Power, C., Higgins, A., & Kohlberg, L. (1989). Lawrence Kohlberg’s approach to moral education. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramos, H., Man, T., Mustafa, M., & Ng, Z. (2014). Psychological ownership in small family firms: Family and non-family employees work attitudes and behaviors. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 5(3), 300–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reichers, A. E., & Schneider, B. (1990). Climate and culture: An evolution of constructs. In B. Schneider (Ed.), Organizational climate and culture (pp. 5–39). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rich, B. L., LePine, J. A., & Crawford, E. R. (2010). Job engagement: Antecedents and effects on job performance. Academy of Management Journal, 53(3), 617–635.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saks, A. M. (2006). Antecedents and consequences of employee engagement. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 21(7), 600–619.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schafer, J. L. (1999). NORM: Multiple imputation of incomplete multivariate data under a normal model, version 2 [Software for Windows 95/98/NT]. http://sites.stat.psu.edu/*jls/misoftwa.html.

  • Schaufeli, W. B., Bakker, A. B., & Salanova, M. (2006). The measurement of work engagement with a short questionnaire. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66, 701–716.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaufeli, W. B., Bakker, A. B., & Van Rhenen, W. (2009). How changes in job demands and resources predict burnout, work engagement, and sickness absenteeism. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 30(7), 893–917.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaufeli, W. B., Taris, T. W., & Van Rhenen, W. (2008). Workaholism, burnout and engagement: Three of a kind or three different kinds of employee well-being. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 57(2), 173–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schnell, T., Höge, T., & Pollet, E. (2013). Predicting meaning in work: Theory, data, implications. Journal of Positive Psychology, 8(6), 543–554.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seyr, S., & Vollmer, V. (2014). Socio-moral climate, debate, and decision comprehensiveness interplay for team innovation. International Journal of Conflict Management, 25(2), 105–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vandewalle, D., Van Dyne, L., & Kostova, T. (1995). Psychological ownership: An empirical examination of its consequences. Group and Organization Management, 20(2), 210–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Dierendonck, D. (2011). Servant leadership: A review and synthesis. Journal of Management, 37(4), 1228–1261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Dyne, L., Cummings, L. L., & Parks, J. M. (1995). Extra-role behaviors: In pursuit of construct and definitional clarity (A bridge over muddied waters). In L. Cummings & B. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 17, pp. 215–285). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Dyne, L., & Pierce, J. L. (2004). Psychological ownership and feelings of possession: Three field studies predicting employee attitudes and organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, 439–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Von Krogh, G. (1998). Care in knowledge creation. California Management Review, 40(3), 133–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, S. H., Parker, C. P., & Christiansen, N. D. (2003). Employees that think and act like owners: Effects of ownership beliefs and behaviors on organizational effectiveness. Personnel Psychology, 56(4), 847–871.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, J. C., Edwards, B. D., Paul, J., Burke, M., Christian, M., & Eissa, G. (2016). Change the referent? A meta-analytic investigation of direct and referent-shift consensus models for organizational climate. Journal of Management, 42(4), 838–861.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, W. G., Unterrainer, C., & Höge, T. (2008). Socio-moral atmosphere and prosocial and democratic value orientations in enterprises with different levels of structurally anchored participation. Zeitschrift für Personalforschung, 22(2), 171–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, W. G., Unterrainer, C., & Schmid, B. (2009). The influence of organizational democracy on employees’ socio-moral climate and prosocial behavioral orientations. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 30(8), 1127–1149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zarraga, C., & Bonache, J. (2005). The impact of team atmosphere on knowledge outcomes in self-managed teams. Organization Studies, 26(5), 661–681.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of OklahomaTulsa, Tulsa, USA

    Brigitte Steinheider

  2. TUM School of Management, Munich, Germany

    Armin Pircher Verdorfer

Authors
  1. Brigitte Steinheider
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Armin Pircher Verdorfer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Brigitte Steinheider .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Human Resource Management, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa

    Chantal Olckers

  2. Optentia Research Focus Area, North-West University, Vanderbijlpark, South Africa

    Llewellyn van Zyl

  3. Optentia Research Focus Area, School of Industrial Psychology and Human Resource Management, North-West University, Vanderbijlpark, South Africa

    Leoni van der Vaart

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Steinheider, B., Verdorfer, A.P. (2017). Climate Change? Exploring the Role of Organisational Climate for Psychological Ownership. In: Olckers, C., van Zyl, L., van der Vaart, L. (eds) Theoretical Orientations and Practical Applications of Psychological Ownership. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70247-6_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation