Skip to main content

Identifying Key Elements of Search Results for Document Selection in the Digital Age: An Observational Study

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Digital Libraries: Data, Information, and Knowledge for Digital Lives (ICADL 2017)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 10647))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Academic database systems are vitally important tools for enabling researchers to find relevant, useful articles. Identifying how researchers select documents from search results is an extremely useful measure for improving the functions or interfaces of academic retrieval systems. This study aims to reveal which elements are checked, and in what order, when researchers select from among search results. It consists of two steps: an observational study of search sessions performed by researchers who volunteered, and a questionnaire to confirm whether extracted elements and patterns are used. This article reports findings from the observational study and introduces questions we developed based on the study. In the observational study we obtained data on nine participants who were asked to search for documents using information retrieval systems. The search sessions were recorded using a voice recorder and by capturing screen images. The participants were also asked to state which elements they checked in selecting documents, along with the reasons for their selections. Three patterns of order of checking were found. In pattern 1, seven researchers used titles and abstracts as the primary elements. In pattern 2, the others used titles and then accessed the full text before making a decision on their selection. In pattern 3, one participant searched for images and accessed the full text from the link in those pictures. We also found participants used novel elements for selecting. We subsequently developed items for a questionnaire reflecting the findings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Liyana, S., Noorhidawati, A.: How graduate students seek for information: convenience or guaranteed result? Malays. J. Libr. Inf. Sci. 19(2), 1–15 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Pajić, D.: Browse to search, visualize to explore: who needs an alternative information retrieving model? Comput. Hum. Behav. 39, 145–153 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Wang, P., Soergel, D.: A cognitive model of document use during a research project. Study I. Document selection. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. 49(2), 115–133 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Macedo-Rouet, M., Rouet, J.-F., Ros, C., et al.: How do scientists select articles in the PubMed database? An empirical study of criteria and strategies. Eur. Rev. Appl. Psychol. 62(2), 63–72 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Xie, I., Benoit III, E.: Search result list evaluation versus document evaluation: similarities and differences. J. Documentation 69(1), 49–80 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Nicholas, D., Huntington, P., Jamali, H.R.: The use, users, and role of abstracts in the digital scholarly environment. J. Acad. Librarianship 33(4), 446–453 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hagiwara, Y., Wu, M., Mizutani, E., et al.: An experiment to identify how researchers select documents from search results. In: Proceedings of CiSAP Workshop 2015, pp. 8–11 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hagiwara, Y., Ishita, E., Mizutani, E., et al.: A preliminary study and analysis to identify key elements in document selection. In: Information Seeking in Context, ISIC 2016, Zadar (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bae, S., Marshall, C.C., Meintanis, K., et al.: Patterns of reading and organizing information in document triage. In: ASIST Proceedings, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 1–27 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Stelmaszewska, H., Blandford, A.: From physical to digital: a case study of computer scientists’ behavior in physical libraries. Int. J. Digit. Libr. 4(2), 82–92 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number JP15H01721.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yasuko Hagiwara .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Hagiwara, Y., Ishita, E., Mizutani, E., Fukushima, K., Watanabe, Y., Tomiura, Y. (2017). Identifying Key Elements of Search Results for Document Selection in the Digital Age: An Observational Study. In: Choemprayong, S., Crestani, F., Cunningham, S. (eds) Digital Libraries: Data, Information, and Knowledge for Digital Lives. ICADL 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10647. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70232-2_20

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70232-2_20

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-70231-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-70232-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics