Skip to main content

Writers of the Lost Paper: A Case Study on Barriers to (Re-) Finding Publications

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Digital Libraries: Data, Information, and Knowledge for Digital Lives (ICADL 2017)

Abstract

We document the surprising hurdles that we encountered when attempting a known-item search to locate copies of four of our own published research papers, known to be archived in the ACM Digital Library and Google Scholar. The discoveries made in this exercise in ‘search engine archaeology’ are noteworthy as they are equally relevant to other users engaging with these and other digital libraries, to whom the pitfalls are much less readily apparent. We present details of our investigation together with a description of MEDDLE (a ModifiED Digital Library Environment), a proof-of-concept system that illustrates a technique to address some of these search issues for a target digital library. We conclude with suggestions on how scholarly digital libraries may avoid these issues in the future.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://experts.illinois.edu/en/publications/improving-access-to-large-scale-digital-libraries-throughsemantic.

  2. 2.

    http://bit.ly/2kTTxd3.

  3. 3.

    https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/0936/fece67ba70cf263dcf8fdef6e2aa77ea1145.pdf.

  4. 4.

    http://dl.acm.org/documentation/Types.htm#phrases.

  5. 5.

    https://bedrock.resnet.cms.waikato.ac.nz/meddle/.

References

  1. JCDL16A: Hinze, A., Bainbridge, D., Cunningham, S.J., Downie, J.S.: Low-cost semantic enhancement to digital library metadata and indexing: simple yet effective strategies. In: JCDL 2016, pp. 93–102 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  2. JCDL16B: Hinze, A., Coleman, M., Cunningham, S.J., Bainbridge, D.: Semantic bookworm: mining literary resources revisited. In: JCDL 2016, pp. 227–228 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  3. JCDL15: Hinze, A., Taube-Schock, C., Bainbridge, D., Matamua, R., Downie. J.S.: Improving access to large-scale digital libraries through semantic-enhanced search and disambiguation. In: JCDL 2015, pp. 147–156 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  4. SIGWEB: Hinze, A., Taube-Schock, C., Bainbridge, D., Cunningham, S.J., Downie. J.S.: Introducing capisco: a semantically-enhanced search and discovery system for large-scale text corpora. SIGWEB Newslett. 14, November 2015. Autumn 2015, Article 4

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bainbridge, D., Twidale, M.B., Nichols, D.M.: That’s ‘é’ not ‘þ’ ‘?’ or ‘☐’: a user-driven context-aware approach to erroneous metadata in digital libraries. In: Proceedings of the 11th Annual International ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital libraries (JCDL 2011), pp. 39–48. ACM, New York, NY, USA (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gladney, H.: Preserving Digital Information. Springer, Heidelberg (2007). doi:10.1007/978-3-540-37887-7

    Google Scholar 

  7. Beall, J.: Metadata and data quality problems in the digital library. J. Digital Inf. 6(3), 1368–7506 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bui, Y., Park, J.-R.: An assessment of metadata quality: a case study of the national science digital library metadata repository. In: Proceedings of the Annual Conference of CAIS/Actes du Congrès Annuel de l’ACSI (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Currier, S., Barton, J., O’Beirne, R., Ryan, B.: Quality assurance for digital learning object repositories: issues for the metadata creation process. ALT-J Res. Learn. Technol. 12(1), 5–20 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Guy, M., Powell, A., Day, M.: Improving the quality of metadata in e-print archives. Ariadne 38 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Park, J.-R.: Metadata quality in digital repositories: a survey of the current state of the art. Cataloging Classif. Q. 47(3–4), 213–228 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Park, J.-R., Tosaka, Y.: Metadata creation practices in digital repositories and collections: schemata, selection criteria, and interoperability. Inf. Technol. Libr. 29(3), 104–116 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Maurer, M.B., McCutcheon, S., Schwing, T.: Who’s doing what? Findability and author-supplied etd metadata in the library catalog. Cataloging Classif. Q. 49(4), 277–310 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Bainbridge, D., Downie, J.S.: All for one and one for all: reconciling research and production values at the hathitrust through user-scripting. In: Joint Conference on Digital Libraries JCDL 2017, pp. 283–284 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Annika Hinze .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Bainbridge, D., Cunningham, S.J., Hinze, A., Stephen Downie, J. (2017). Writers of the Lost Paper: A Case Study on Barriers to (Re-) Finding Publications. In: Choemprayong, S., Crestani, F., Cunningham, S. (eds) Digital Libraries: Data, Information, and Knowledge for Digital Lives. ICADL 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10647. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70232-2_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70232-2_18

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-70231-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-70232-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics