The Complementarity of Foreign and Domestic Investments by Emerging-Market Multinationals

Chapter
Part of the The Academy of International Business book series (AIB)

Abstract

We study the impact of foreign direct investment on domestic investment by emerging-market firms. This relationship underlies a key policy debate on whether and how home-country governments should support outward foreign direct investment. While some governments are strongly in favour of supporting their firms’ overseas expansion, many are hesitant as outward foreign investment is considered to replace domestic investment and thus harmful to the home economy. We argue that emerging-market firms’ foreign expansion complements rather than substitutes their domestic investment because foreign direct investment enables these firms to increase their efficiency and improve their value chain positioning. The ability to arbitrage different home and host countries’ comparative advantages improves the efficiency and sophistication of home operations, ultimately contributing to further domestic investment and growth.

References

  1. Al-Sadiq, A. (2013). Outward foreign direct investment and domestic investment: The case of developing countries (IMF Working Paper, WP/13/52).Google Scholar
  2. Andersen, P. S., & Hainaut, P. (1998). Foreign direct investment and employment in the industries countries (BIS Working Papers No. 61).Google Scholar
  3. Bartlett, C. A., & Ghoshal, S. (1989). Managing across borders. The transnational solution. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  4. Branunerhjelm, P., & Oxelheim, L. (2000). Does FDI replace home country investment? The effect of European integration on the location of Swedish investment? Journal of Common Market Studies, 38(2), 199–221.Google Scholar
  5. Branunerhjelm, P., Oxelheim, L., & Thulin, P. (2005). The relationship between domestic and outward foreign direct investment: The role of industry-specific effects. International Business Review, 14(6), 677–694.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cuervo-Cazurra, A. (2012). How the analysis of developing country multinational companies helps advance theory: Solving the Goldilocks debate. Global Strategy Journal, 2(3), 153–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cuervo-Cazurra, A., Narula, R., & Un, C. A. (2015). Internationalization motives: Sell more, buy better, upgrade and escape. Multinational Business Review, 23(1), 25–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cuervo-Cazurra, A., & Ramamurti, R. (Eds.). (2014). Understanding multinationals from emerging markets. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Desai, M., Foley, F., & Hines, J. (2005). Foreign direct investment and the domestic capital stock. International Intrafirm Production Decisions, 95(2), 33–38.Google Scholar
  10. Economist. (2017, January 5). Ford motors courts Donald Trump by scrapping a planned plant in Mexico. The Economist. https://www.economist.com/news/business/21713899-instead-it-emphasised-new-investment-and-jobs-michigan-ford-motors-courts-donald-trump. Accessed April 18, 2017.
  11. Eriksson, K., Johanson, J., Majkgård, A., & Sharma, D. D. (1997). Experiential knowledge and cost in the internationalization process. Journal of International Business Studies, 28(2), 337–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Feldstein, M. (1994). The effects of outbound foreign direct investment on the domestic capital stock. NBER Working Paper Series.Google Scholar
  13. Gammeltoft, P., & Kokko, A. (2013). Outward foreign direct investment from emerging economies and national development strategies: Three regimes. International Journal of Technological Learning, Innovation and Development, 6(1/2), 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Globerman, S. (1994). The public and private interests in outward direct investment. In S. Globerman (Ed.), Canadian-based multinationals (pp. 1–34). Calgary: The University of Calgary Press.Google Scholar
  15. Globerman, S. (2012). Investing abroad and investing at home: Complements or substitutes? Multinational Business Review, 20(3), 217–230.Google Scholar
  16. Goh, S., & Wong, K. (2014). Could inward FDI offset the substitution effect of outward FDI on domestic investment? Evidence from Malaysia. Prague Economic Papers, 4, 413–425.Google Scholar
  17. Graham, E. (1997). The (not wholly satisfactory) state of the theory of foreign direct investment and the multinational enterprise. In J. L. Stein (Ed.), The globalization of markets (pp. 99–122). Heidelberg: Physica-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Greene, W. (2000). Econometric analysis (4th ed.). London: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  19. Hejazi, W., & Pauly, P. (2003). Motivations for FDI and domestic capital formation. Journal of International Business Studies, 34(3), 282–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hering, L., Inui, T., & Poncet, S. (2010). The elusive impact of investing abroad for Japanese parent firms: Can disaggregation according to FDI motives help? Centre d’etudes prospectives et d’informations (Internationales Working Paper No 2010–01).Google Scholar
  21. Herzer, D., & Schrooten, M. (2007). Outward FDI and domestic investment in two industrialized countries. Economic Letters, 99, 139–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hsu, W., Wang, C., & Clegg, J. (2015). The effects of outward foreign direct investment on fixed-capital formation at home: The roles of host location and industry characteristics. Global Economic Review, 44(3), 353–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hymer, S. (1976). The international operations of national firms: A study of direct foreign investment (Originally presented as unpublished doctoral dissertation, 1960). MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  24. Kim, S. (2000). Effects of outward foreign direct investment on home country performance evidence from Korea. NBER-EASE, 9, 295–317.Google Scholar
  25. Kokko, A. (2006). The home country effects of FDI in developed economies. The European Institute of Japanese Studies (EIJS Working Paper Series 225).Google Scholar
  26. Lin, H., & Chuang, W. (2007). FDI and domestic investment in Taiwan: An endogenous switching model. The Developing Economies, 45(4), 465–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lu, J., & Beamish, P. (2004). International diversification and firm performance: The S-curve hypothesis. The Academy of Management Journal, 47(4), 598–609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Luo, Y., & Tung, R. (2007). International expansion of emerging market enterprise: A springboard perspective. Journal of International Business Studies, 38(4), 481–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Luo, Y., Xue, Q., & Han, B. (2010). How emerging market governments promote outward FDI: Experience from China. Journal of World Business, 45(1), 68–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Madhok, A., & Keyhani, M. (2012). Acquisitions as entrepreneurship: Asymmetries, opportunities, and the internationalization of multinationals from emerging economies. Global Strategy Journal, 2(1), 26–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Mathews, J. (2006). Dragon multinationals: New players in 21st century globalization. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 23(1), 5–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Onaran, O., Stockhammer, E., & Zwickl, K. (2013). FDI and domestic investment in Germany: Crowding in or out? International Review of Applied Economics, 27(4), 429–448.Google Scholar
  33. Pananond, P. (2007). The changing dynamics of Thai multinationals after the Asian economic crisis. Journal of International Management, 13(3), 356–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Pananond, P. (2016). From servant to master: Power repositioning of emerging-market companies in global value chains. Asian Business and Management, 15(4), 292–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Ramamurti, R. (2012). What is really different about emerging market multinationals? Global Strategy Journal, 2(1), 41–47.Google Scholar
  36. Ramamurti, R., & Singh, J. V. (2009). Emerging multinationals in emerging markets. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Sauvant K. P. (2017). China moves the G20 on international investment. Columbia FDI Perspectives, no. 190.Google Scholar
  38. Svensson, R. (1996). Effects of overseas production on home country exports: Evidence based on Swedish multinationals. Weltwirtscaftliches Archiv, 132(2), 304–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Tan, B., Goh, S., & Wong, K. (2016). The effects of inward and outward FDI on domestic investment: Evidence using panel data of ASEAN–8 countries. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 17(5), 717–733.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Wang, S. L., Luo, Y., Lu, X., Sun, J., Maksimov, V., & Wang, S. (2014). Autonomy delegation to foreign subsidiaries: An enabling mechanism for emerging market multinationals. Journal of International Business Studies, 45(2), 111–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Williamson, P. J., Ramamurti, R., Fleury, A., & Fleury, M. T. L. (Eds.). (2013). The competitive advantage of emerging market multinationals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Wongviwatchai, U. (2013). Five-Year Investment Promotion Strategy Draft (2013–17). Thailand Board of Investment. Retrieved from www.Boi.go.th/upload/content/2%20Eng_New%20BOI%20Strategy_45829.pdf. Accessed May 17, 2017.
  43. Zaheer, S., & Mosakowski, E. (1997). The dynamics of the liability of foreignness: A global study of survival in financial services. Strategic Management Journal, 18(6), 439–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Thammasat Business SchoolThammasat UniversityBangkokThailand
  2. 2.Northeastern UniversityBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations