Multinationals, Corporate Social Responsibility and Regional Change in Transition Economies

Part of the The Academy of International Business book series (AIB)


In this chapter, Wrana and Revilla Diez bring the disciplines of international business studies and economic geography closer to each other, by conceptualising how multinational enterprises (MNEs) become institutional entrepreneurs in host regions of transition economies. More precisely, they present and discuss the Corporate Social Responsibility–Regional Industrial Upgrading (CSR-RIU)-model. On the one hand, this conceptual model theorises how global CSR certificates become dispersed into a regional economy, which, in turn, enables local firms to enter MNEs’ value chains. On the other hand, it discusses how MNEs’ local CSR projects in the education sector can improve a region’s human capital base leading to closer collaboration between MNEs, local firms, vocational schools and universities which may boost regional economic development in the long run.


  1. Abramovitz, M. (1986). Catching up, forging ahead and falling behind. The Journal of Economic History, 46(2), 385–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aitken, B. J., & Harrison, A. E. (1999). Do domestic firms benefit from direct foreign investment? Evidence from Venezuela. American Economic Review, 89(3), 605–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Altenburg, T., & Lütkenhorst, W. (2015). Industrial policy in developing countries. Failing markets, weak states. Cheltenham and Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Amin, A., & Thrift, N. (1995). Globalisation, institutional ‘thickness’ and the local economy. In P. Healey, S. Cameron, S. Davoudi, S. Graham, & A. Madani-Pour. (Eds.), Managing cities. The new urban context. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  5. Blomström, M., & Kokko, A. (2001). Foreign direct investment and spillovers of technology. International Journal of Technology Management, 22(5/6), 435–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Blomström, M., & Kokko, A. (2002). FDI and human capital. A research agenda (OECD Rep. No. 195). Available at Checked on 09.06.2017.
  7. Blowfield, M., & Frynas, J. G. (2005). Editorial setting new agendas. Critical perspectives on corporate social responsibility in the developing world. International Affairs, 81(3), 499–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Braun, B. (2005). Building global institutions: The diffusion of management standards in the world economy. An institutional perspective. In C. G. Alvstam & E. Schamp (Eds.), Linking industries across the world. Processes of global networking (pp. 3–28). Aldershot, Hants [u.a.]: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  9. Campbell, J. L. (2004). Institutional change and globalization. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Cantwell, J., Dunning, J. H., & Lundan, S. M. (2010). An evolutionary approach to understanding international business activity. The co-evolution of MNEs and the institutional environment. Journal of International Business Studies, 41(4), 567–586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Coe, N. M., Hess, M., Yeung, H., Dicken, P., & Henderson, J. (2004). ‘Globalizing’ regional development. A global production network perspective. Transnational Institute of British Geography, 29, 468–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity. A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Crespo, N., & Fontoura, M. P. (2007). Determinant factors of FDI spillovers—What do we really know? World Development, 35(3), 410–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dicken, P. (2015). Global shift. Mapping the changing contours of the world economy (7th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  15. DiMaggio, P. (1988). Interest and agency in institutional theory. In L. G. Zucker (Ed.), Institutional patterns and organizations (pp. 3–22). Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.Google Scholar
  16. DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited. Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dunning, J. H., & Lundan, S. M. (2008). Multinational enterprises and the global economy (2nd ed.). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  18. Ernst, D. (2002). Global production networks and the changing geography of innovation systems. Implications for developing countries. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 11(4), 497–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Eweje, G. (2006). The role of MNEs in community development initiatives in developing countries. Corporate social responsibility at work in Nigeria and South Africa. Business and Society, 45(2), 93–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Faulconbridge, J. R., & Muzio, D. (2015). Transnational corporations shaping institutional change. The case of english law firms in Germany. Journal of Economic Geography, 15(6), 1195–1226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fikru, M. G. (2014). Firm level determinants of international certification: Evidence from Ethiopia. World Development, 64, 286–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gardberg, N. A., & Fombrun, C. J. (2006). Corporate citizenship: Creating intangible assets across institutional environments. Academy of Management Review, 31(2), 329–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Giuliani, E. (2016). Human rights and corporate social responsibility in developing countries’ industrial clusters. Journal of Business Ethics, 133(1), 39–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Giuliani, E., & Macchi, C. (2014). Multinational corporations’ economic and human rights impacts on developing countries: A review and research agenda. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 38(2), 479–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Humphrey, J., & Schmitz, H. (2002). How does insertion in global value chains affect upgrading in industrial clusters? Regional Studies, 36(9), 1017–1027.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Husted, B. W., Montiel, I., & Christmann, P. (2016). Effects of local legitimacy on certification decisions to global and national CSR standards by multinational subsidiaries and domestic firms. Journal of International Business Studies, 47(3), 382–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Intarakumnerd, P., Chairatana, P., & Tangchitpiboon, T. (2002). National innovation system in less successful developing countries. The case of Thailand. Research Policy, 31(8/9), 1445–1457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Jamali, D. (2010). The CSR of MNC subsidiaries in developing countries. Global, local, substantive or diluted? Journal of Business Ethics, 93(2010), 181–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lall, S. (1992). Technological capabilities and industrialization. World Development, 20(2), 165–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lawrence, T. B., Hardy, C., & Phillips, N. (2002). Institutional effects of interorganizational collaboration. The emergence of proto-institutions. The Academy of Management Journals, 45(1), 281–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Liefner, I., & Schiller, D. (2008). Academic capabilities in developing countries—A conceptual framework with empirical illustrations from Thailand. Research Policy, 37(2), 276–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lund-Thomsen, P., & Coe, N. M. (2015). Corporate social responsibility and labour agency. The case of Nike in Pakistan. Journal of Economic Geography, 15(2), 275–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lütkenhorst, W. (2004). Corporate social responsibility and the development agenda. The case for actively involving small and medium enterprises. Intereconomic, 39(3), 157–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Martin, R. (2000). Institutional approaches in economic geography. In E. S. Sheppard & T. J. Barnes (Eds.), A companion to economic geography. Oxford and Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  35. McWilliams, A., Siegel, D. S., & Wright, P. M. (2006). Corporate social responsibility. Strategic implications. Journal of Management Studies, 43(1), 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Meyer, K. E., & Nguyen, H. V. (2005). Foreign investment strategies and sub-national institutions in emerging markets: Evidence from Vietnam. Journal of Management Studies, 42(1), 63–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Meyer, S., & Revilla Diez, J. (2015). One country, two systems: How regional institutions shape governance modes in The Greater Pearl River Delta, China. Papers in Regional Science, 94(4), 891–900.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Nadvi, K. (2008). Global standards, global governance and the organization of global value chains. Journal of Economic Geography, 8(3), 323–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Nadvi, K., & Wältring, F. (2004). Making sense of global standards. In H. Schmitz (Ed.), Local Enterprises in the global economy. Issues of governance and upgrading. Cheltenham and Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  40. Narula, R., & Driffield, N. (2012). Does FDI cause development? The ambiguity of the evidence and why it matters. European Journal of Development Research, 24(1), 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Narula, R., & Dunning, J. H. (2010). Multinational enterprises, development and globalization. Some clarifications and a research agenda. Oxford Development Studies, 38(3), 263–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Narula, R., & Marin, A. (2005). Foreign direct investment spillovers, absorptive capacities and human capital development. Evidence from Argentina (Working Paper No. 96). International Labour Office.Google Scholar
  43. North, D. C. (1991). Institutions. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5(1), 97–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. North, D. C. (1998). Five propositions about institutional change. In J. Knight & I. Sened (Eds.), Explaining social institutions. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  45. Phelps, N. A., Mackinnon, D., Stone, I., & Braidford, P. (2003). Embedding the multinationals? Institutions and the development of overseas manufacturing affiliates in Wales and North East England. Regional Studies, 37(1), 27–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Pike, A., Rodríguez-Pose, A., & Tomaney, J. (2017). Shifting horizons in local and regional development. Regional Studies, 51(1), 46–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Pilz, M., & Li, J. (2014). Tracing teutonic footprints in VET around the world? European Journal of Training and Development, 38(8), 745–763.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Porter, M. E. (1990). The competitive advantage of nations. New York, NY: Free Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2011). Creating shared value. How to reinvent capitalism—And unleash a wave of innovation and growth. Harvard Business Review, 89(1/2), 62–77.Google Scholar
  50. Rafiqui, P. S. (2009). Evolving economic landscapes. Why new institutional economics matters for economic geography. Journal of Economic Geography, 9(3), 329–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Ramachandran, L., & Scott, S. (2009). Single-player universities in the south. The role of university actors in development in Vietnam’s north central coast region. Regional Studies, 43(5), 693–706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Revilla Diez, J., & Kiese, M. (2006). Scaling innovation in South East Asia: Empirical evidence from Singapore, Penang (Malaysia) and Bangkok. Regional Studies, 40(9), 1005–1023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Revilla Diez, J., Schiller, D., & Zvirgzde, D. (2016). Doing business in Ukraine—Multinational companies in the trap of regional institutions? Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 34(4), 638–655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Rigg, J., Promphaking, B., & Le Mare, A. (2014). Personalizing the middle-income trap. An inter-generational migrant view from rural Thailand. World Development, 59, 184–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Rodríguez-Pose, A. (2013). Do institutions matter for regional development? Regional Studies, 47(7), 1034–1047.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Sala-I-Martin, X., Blanke, J., Drzeniek, H. M., Geiger, T., Mia, I., & Paua, F. (2007). The global competitiveness index. Measuring the productive potential of nations. World Economic Forum. Available at Downloaded on 09.06.2017.
  57. Sauvant, K. P. (1999). World Investment Report 1999. Foreign Direct Investment and the Challenge of Development. New York: UN.Google Scholar
  58. Schiller, D., & Lee, K. (2015). Are university-industry links meaningful for catch up? A comparative analysis of five Asian countries. In E. Albuquerque, W. Suzigan, W. Kruss, & K. Lee (Eds.), Developing national systems of innovation. University-industry interactions in the global south. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  59. Schiller, D., & Revilla Diez, J. (2007). University-industry linkages. potential and realization in developing countries: Thai experiences. Tech Monitor (Jan–Feb), 39–44.Google Scholar
  60. Schmitz, H., Dau, A. T., Pham T. T. H., & McCulloch, N. (2012). Who drives economic reform in Vietnam’s provinces? Institute of Development Studies and VCCI. Brighton (IDS Research Rep. No. 76). Available at Downloaded 29.09.2016.
  61. Setterfield, M. A. (1993). A model of institutional hysteresis. Journal of Economic Issues, 27(3), 755–774.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Shirley, M. M. (2008). Institutions and development. In C. Menard & M. M. Shirley (Eds.), Handbook of new institutional economics. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  63. Varga, A. (2000). Local academic knowledge transfers and the concentration of economic activity. Journal of Regional Science, 40(2), 289–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Watts, P., & Holme, L. (2000). Corporate social responsibility. Meeting changing expectations. Dorset: World Business Council for Sustainable Development.Google Scholar
  65. Wong, P. K. (2001). Leveraging multinational corporations, fostering technopreneurship. The changing role of S&T policy in Singapore. International Journal of Technology Management, 22(5/6), 539–567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. World Economic Forum. (2013). The Global Competitiveness Report 2013–2014. Cologny: World Economic Forum.Google Scholar
  67. Wrana, J., & Revilla Diez, J. (2016). Can multinational enterprises introduce new institutions into a host country? An explorative study about MNEs’ training programs with educational institutes and their potential influences on Vietnam’s vocational education sector. Geographische Zeitschrift, 104(3), 158–182.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Global South Studies CenterUniversity of CologneKölnGermany
  2. 2.Institute of GeographyUniversity of CologneKölnGermany

Personalised recommendations