Abstract
Literature on transitional justice and victimology show an interest in how courts and laws define victimhood and how such definitions shape victim participation, with hierarchies of suffering as the result. In this chapter, I move beyond the legalistic perspective on the politics of victimhood. I question how organised victims construct victimhood for political and social purposes. I demonstrate that organised victims in Peru constructed a sense of similarity and difference by means of a categorical repertoire based on single victim categories, and by means of an organisational repertoire based on generational issues. I conclude that the inclusion of relationships between social organisations as integrated elements into transitional justice research is important for enhancing the understanding of the successes of civil society and transitional justice mechanisms.
The research for this article has been supported by the Centre for Latin American Research and Documentation (CEDLA) and Social and Cultural Anthropology, the Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam. I express my gratitude to the many Peruvians who shared their time, experiences and opinions with me, and to the members of Reflexíon, National Association of Family members of Detained and Disappeared persons in Emergency Zones (ANFASEP) and Regional Association of Displaced of Central Peru (ARDCP). I thank Vicky Rojas and Miguel Amaya for their research assistance. I would also like to thank Isabel Coral and Jairo Rivas for their time to explain to me during different occasions the past and present legal norms and political decisions related to the victims of the political violence.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
I use pseudonyms throughout this chapter to protect the anonymity of my informants.
- 2.
Multi-sited ethnographic field research (Marcus 1995) has been conducted to include Peru’s social, geographic, economic and political differences in the study. Data were gathered by means of observations and in-depth, semi-structured interviews over a span of 20 months in Peru, between 2008 and 2014. At all three sites, I participated on a daily basis in a wide variety of activities attended by members (e.g., internal meetings of their own members or external meetings between members of their boards and employees of NGOs or governmental entities, public demonstrations, commemorative ceremonies and festive activities). Two types of informants were interviewed: 61 members of the three associations, and 35 non-victims, namely employees of NGOs and governmental organisations that belonged to the network of the associations. Data were analysed with the use of a qualitative data analysis software tool.
- 3.
- 4.
National Association of Family members of Detained and Disappeared persons in Emergency Zones.
- 5.
Regional Association of Displaced of Central Peru.
- 6.
Association Reflection of Liberated Innocents.
- 7.
- 8.
Apoyo Rural or Educational Services, Promotion and Rural Support.
- 9.
Center for Psychosocial Attention.
- 10.
For instance, ANFASEP received the Salomón Lerner Febres award for Human Rights in 2005, and their founder, Mama Angélica, received the medal of the Ombudsman in 2012 for her efforts in defending human rights and promoting the determination of the fate of those missing and presumed dead.
- 11.
See, for an extensive analysis of the founding and meaning of this museum, Milton and Ulfe (2011).
- 12.
Law No 28223.
- 13.
Decree No 051-2011-PCM.
- 14.
Law No 28592.
- 15.
Law No 30470.
- 16.
Until 2009, Peru was classified as a lower-middle-income country. The status is based on the GDP income per capita, and does not account for inequality in income distribution.
- 17.
International Council of Voluntary Agencies.
- 18.
National Federation of Victim Organisations of Violence of Peru.
- 19.
Reflexión has not integrated a newer generation yet, such as children of Reflexión members. Perhaps this will also never happen, as their children have not been unjustly detained themselves. Still, this does not mean that they did not suffer from what happened to their parents and maybe they also want public acknowledgement for what happened to their parents.
- 20.
Association of Young Orphans of Sociopolitical Violence.
- 21.
03/01/2010 (Ayacucho).
- 22.
01/28/2010 (Ayacucho).
- 23.
Wallerstein demonstrated that concerted organisation among mobilised people belonging to different legal or social categories has been problematic ever since the nineteenth century (2003).
- 24.
Thus, this is another division than the one Sajjad (2016) encountered in her research, as victims in Nepal included and excluded others on the basis of being a victim of violence committed by the same type of perpetrator.
References
ANFASEP. (2007). ¿Hasta Cuando tu Silencio? Testimonios de Dolor y Coraje. Ayacucho: ANFASEP.
Bebbington, A., Mitlin, D., Mogaladi, J., Scurrah, M., & Bielich, C. (2010). Decentring poverty, reworking government: Social movements and states in the government of poverty. The Journal of Development Studies, 46(7), 1304–1326.
Boesten, J. (2014). Sexual violence during war and peace: Gender, power, and post-conflict justice in Peru. New York: Palgrave Macmillan and United States Institute of Peace Press.
Carroll, T., Humphreys, D., & Scurrah, M. (1991). Grassroots support organisations in Peru. Development in Practice, 1(2), 97–108.
Castellón, R., & Laplante, L. (2005). Los Afectados por el Conflicto Armado Interno del Perú. Exigiendo el Derecho a la Salud Mental. Lima: Consorcio de Investigación Económica y Social Observatorio del Derecho a Salud.
CONDECOREP. (2004). Espejo de la Verdad, Memoria para no Olvidar, Lecciones para la Historia. Lima: Gráfica Bellido S.R.L.
Diez, A. (2004). Los Desplazados en el Perú. Lima: Comité de la Cruz Roja.
García-Godos, J. (2016). Victims in Focus. International Journal of Transitional Justice, 10(2), 350–358.
Guillerot, J. (2006). Linking gender and reparations in Peru: A failed opportunity. In R. Rubio-Marin (Ed.), What happened to the women? Gender and reparations for human rights violations. New York: Social Science Research Council.
Guillerot, J., & Magarell, L. (2006). Reparación en la Transición Peruana: Memorias de un Proceso Inacabado. Lima: APRODEH, ICTJ.
Marcus, G. (1995). Ethnography in/of the world system: The emergence of multi-sited ethnography. Annual Review of Anthropology, 24, 95–117.
McEvoy, K., & McConnachie, K. (2012). Victimology in transitional justice: Victimhood, innocence and hierarchy. European Journal of Criminology, 9(5), 527–538.
Milton, C., & Ulfe, M. (2011). Promoting Peru: Tourism and post-conflict memory. In K. Bilbija & L. Payne (Eds.), Accounting for violence: The memory market in Latin America. Durham: Duke University Press.
Muñoz, H. (1998). The construction of new sensibilities. In S. Stern (Ed.), Shining and other paths: War and society in Peru 1980–1995. Durham and London: Duke University Press.
OXFAM-GB. (2004). Mapeo de las Organizaciones de Afectadas por la Violencia Política en el Perú. Lima: Oxfam. On file with author.
Panfichi, A., & Alvarado, M. (2010). Desconfianza y Control: Organizaciones no Gubernamentales y Política en el Perú. In B. Sorj (Ed.), Usos, Abusos y Desafíos de la Sociedad Civil en América Latina. Buenos Aires: Siglo XXI.
Robbins, J. (2013). Beyond the suffering subject: Toward an anthropology of the good. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 19(3), 447–462.
Rombouts, H. (2002). Importance and difficulties of victim-based research in post-conflict societies. European Journal of Crime, Criminal Law and Criminal Justice, 10(2), 216–232.
Sajjad, T. (2016). Heavy hands, helping hands, holding hands: The politics of exclusion in victims’ networks in Nepal. International Journal of Transitional Justice, 10(1), 25–45.
Stavroppoulou, M. (1998). Will Peru’s displaced return? In R. Cohen & F. Deng (Eds.), The forsaken people. Case studies of the internally displaced. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
Strassner, V. (2013). From victimhood to political protagonism: Victim groups and associations in the process of dealing with a violent past. In T. Bonacker & C. Safferling (Eds.), Victims of international crimes: An interdisciplinary discourse. The Hague: Asser Press.
Tamagno, C. (1998). Abriendo Espacio…Tejiendo Redes. Desplazamiento y Reconstrucción en la Región Central. Master Thesis, Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú, on file with author.
Theidon, K. (2010). Ambiguous affects: Children, kinship, and community in Post-War Ayacucho. A. Contracorriente, 7(3), 374–381.
Tilly, C. (1986). The contentious French. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
de Waardt, M. (2012). Do victims only cry? Victim-survivors and their grassroots organizations in Peru. In A. Ouweneel (Ed.), Andeans and their use of cultural resources, space, gender, rights & identity (pp. 63–84). Amsterdam: CEDLA Publications.
de Waardt, M. (2013). Are Peruvian victims being mocked?: Politicization of victimhood and victims’ motivations for reparations. Human Rights Quarterly, 35(4), 830–849.
de Waardt, M. (2016). Naming and shaming victims: The semantics of victimhood. International Journal of Transitional Justice, 10(3), 432–450.
De Waardt, M., & Ypeij, A. (2016). Peruvian grassroots organizations in times of violence and peace. Between economic solidarity, participatory democracy and feminism. Voluntas International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 28(3), 1249–1269.
Wallerstein, I. (2003). Citizens all? Citizens some! The making of the citizen. Society for Comparative Studies in Society and History, 15(4), 650–679.
Youngers, C. (2007). En busca de la verdad y la justicia. La Coordinadora Nacional de Derechos Humanos del Perú. Retrieved from http://www.historizarelpasadovivo.cl/downloads/youngers.pdf
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
de Waardt, M. (2018). The Politics of Victimhood at the Grassroots Level: Inclusion and Exclusion Among Peruvian Victim Organisations. In: Druliolle, V., Brett, R. (eds) The Politics of Victimhood in Post-conflict Societies. St Antony's Series. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70202-5_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70202-5_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-70201-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-70202-5
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)