Skip to main content

Part of the book series: African Histories and Modernities ((AHAM))

  • 423 Accesses

Abstract

This book critically explores how globalization and democratization affect the economic, social, and political environment within which state and non-state actors operate in the Nigerian oil sector. Implementation of liberal policies in the 1980s engendered many contradictions and created hostilities towards other forms of neo-liberal policies like deregulation. The introductory chapter frames the expectations of the book with background information towards understanding the complex nature of the efforts to deregulate the Nigerian oil sector. This includes historical background on globalized aspects of Nigerian oil sector reform, as well as the realities inherent in the attainment of neo-liberal ideologies in Nigeria as viewed from within the broad spectrum of political economy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Conditionality is a term used to denote what a nation-state must do in return for receiving a loan, debt relief or financial assistance from International Financial Institutions (IFIs) and some bilateral creditors. The most sensitive of these conditions, in some parts of the world, is the insistence that the recipient nation must embark on democratization . The conditions attached to World Bank loans were called Structural Adjustment Credit, while International Monetary Fund (IMF) loans were carried out under a Structural Adjustment Facility (SAF). Over time the term structural adjustment became synonymous with failed policies that undermine democracy. This led the World Bank to rename the loans as Poverty Reduction Support Credits (PRSC), while the IMF changed it to the Poverty Reduction and Growth Facility (PRGF). The changes did not necessarily correspond to changes in conditionality; See Jones and Hardstaff (2005).

  2. 2.

    This is a new approach to politics, economics and social studies in which control of economic factors is transferred from the public domain to the private sector. It is founded on the idea that governments limit deficit spending, reduce or cancel subsidies, embark on the reform of tax law, remove fixed exchange rates, discourage protectionism by opening up markets to competitive trade, and instigate policies of privatization and deregulation. In developing countries, “neoliberalism emerged less for political reasons and more as a result of the need to adjust to international requirements” (Rapley 2004, p. 77).

  3. 3.

    Since the introduction of the IMF -controlled Structural Adjustment Programme (SAP) in Nigeria in the mid-1980s, the Nigerian government has failed to establish good governance in the country.

  4. 4.

    Deregulation (sometimes called “market loosening”) means the removal of statutory barriers that prevent private operators from competing with state enterprises or ownership.

  5. 5.

    Examples of these MNCs operating in the oil regions are Shell, Exxon-Mobil, Chevron-Texaco, Total, and Agip.

  6. 6.

    Niger Delta comprises of the oil producing communities in the South-Eastern and South-South region of Nigeria.

  7. 7.

    In Ghana, mining is acclaimed to benefit majorly the foreign interests and elites in Ghana. Conversely, the Chamber of Mines, the industry’s business organization, argues that mining companies have contributed immensely to the country’s development. For more understanding, see Ayee et al. (2011).

  8. 8.

    The debate on whether Nigeria exhibits the attributes of state failure or collapse is presented later. For more information on state collapse and failure, see Clapham (2002), Englebert (2000), World Bank (1997), Ake 1981, Mimiko (2009, 2010).

  9. 9.

    SAP was the brain child of Margaret Thatcher, the Prime Minister of the United Kingdom and Ronald Reagan, the President of the United States.

  10. 10.

    Privatization is the transfer of state owned business organization and shares to the public, which has become a worldwide strategy for achieving sustainable economic growth and development.

  11. 11.

    The Ibrahim Babangida-led military regime embarked on democratization in the early 1990s, the climax of which was the June 12, 1993 presidential election that was adjudged “free and fair”, but was annulled by President Ibrahim Babangida’s military regime to perpetuate himself in power thereby prolonging military dictatorship in Nigeria.

  12. 12.

    For more understanding see the World Bank report on International Development Assistance Country Partnership Strategy for the Federal Republic of Nigeria (2010–2013), Report No: 46816-NG, July 2, 2009, p. 58. Many members of the Economic Team and Ministers in key government departments were former employees of the World Bank , i.e., Okonjo Iweala , Eze Kwesili, Olusola Soludo. This further substantiated Nigerians’ suspicion of the influence of IFIs in the government’s deregulation programs.

  13. 13.

    See This Day, (2010) “Theory of Deregulation: Landmines and Pitfalls,” October 26.

  14. 14.

    The prices of diesel and kerosene oil were increased and deregulated under the administration of President Obasanjo without any correspondent price parity with international markets. Nigerians felt deceived; hence their resistance to any form of fuel increase under the pretext of deregulation. The argument of increased productivity, gradual falls in prices due to market forces, and accountability which characterized deregulation did not attract the masses.

  15. 15.

    Nigerians, under the leadership of the Nigerian Labour Congress (NLC) , have a history of mass protests and civil disobedience in reaction to increases in the prices of petroleum products.

  16. 16.

    Meaning the complex deregulation in the sector that allegedly removes government subsidy from kerosene and diesel oil, while the government claims the sharing of the subsidy on PMS with consumers.

References

  • Adedipe, B. (2004). The Impact of Oil on Nigeria’s Economic Policy Formulation. Text of a Paper Presented at the Conference on Nigeria: Maximizing Pro-Poor Growth: Regenerating the Socio-Economic Database, Organized by Overseas Development Institute in Collaboration with the Nigerian Economic Summit Group, 16th/17th June.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adesoji, A. O. (2006). Globalization of the Media and the Challenges of Democratization in Nigeria. Nebula, 3(4), 38–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aghion, P., Burgess, R., Redding, S., & Zilibotti, F. (2003). The Unequal Effects of Liberalization: Theory and Evidence from India. Retrieved from http://econ.lse.ac.uk/staff/rburgess/wp/abrz031002.pdf

  • Ake, C. (1981). A Political Economy of Africa. New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ake, C. (1996). Democracy and Development in Africa. Washington, DC: Brooking.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ake, C. (2000). The Feasibility of Democracy in Africa. Dakar: CODESRIA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Akinola, A. O. (2008). Socio-Economic Reforms and the Future of Nigerian State. International Review of Politics and Development (IRPAD), 6(1 & 2), 54–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Akinola, A. O. (2009). Godfatherism and the Future of Nigerian Democracy. African Journal of Political Science and International Relations (AJPSIR), 3(6), 268–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Akinola, A. O. (2011). Niger Delta Crisis: The Nexus Between Militants’ Insurgency and Security in West Africa. Africa Security, 4(1), 46–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Akinola, A. O. (2016). Securitization of Democracy in Nigeria. In D. A. Yagboyaju (Ed.), Reflections on Politics, Governance and Economy in Contemporary Nigeria. Ibadan: University of Ibadan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayee, J., et al. (2011). Political Economy of the Mining Sector in Ghana. Policy Research Policy Paper No 5730. The World Bank Africa Region Public Sector Reform and Capacity Building Unit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clapham, C. (2002). The Challenge to the State in a Globalized World. Development and Change, 33(5), 775–795.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunklin, A. L. (2005). Globalization: A Portrait of Exploitation, Inequality, and Limits. Globalization, 5(2).

    Google Scholar 

  • Eme, O. I., & Onwuka, C. C. (2011). Political Economy of Deregulation Policy in Nigeria: The Challenges Ahead. Journal of Business and Organizational Development, 2, 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Englebert, P. (2000). Solving the Mystery of the AFRICA Dummy. World Development, 28(10), 1821–1835.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fagbadebo, O., & Akinola, A. O. (2010). Post-Amnesty Niger Delta and the Promise of Development: Issues, Problems and Prospects. In A. S. Akpotor (Ed.), Sustainable Environmental Peace and Security in the Niger Delta (pp. 10–20). Abraka: Centre for Environmental and Niger Delta Studies (CENDS), Delta State University Printing Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank, A. G. (2004). The Development of Underdevelopment. In A. K. Mingst & J. L. Snyder (Eds.), Essentials Reading in World Politics (pp. 86–93). New York: W.W. Norton Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grugel, J. (2003). Democratization Studies Globalisation: The Coming of Age of a Paradigm. British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 5(2), 258–283.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huntington, S. (1991). The Third Wave: Democratization in the Twentieth Century. Oklahoma: University of Oklahoma Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ibanga, I. (2005). The Economics of Privatizing and Deregulating the Nigerian Downstream Oil Sector. Valore International. Retrieved from http://www.florin.com/valore/ifiokibanga.html

  • Idumange, J. (2012). Deregulation: Metaphor for Poverty Aggravation. Retrieved from http://modernghana.com/news/256850/1/deregulation-metaphor-for-poverty-aggravation -by-i.html

  • Iwilade, A. (2009). Democracy and Globalization in Africa. Excerpt from a Paper Prepared for Presentation at the 21st Congress of the International Political Science Association Held in Santiago, Chile, July 12–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, T., & Hardstaff, P. (2005). Denying Democracy: How the IMF and World Bank Take Power from People. London: World Development Movement.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khor, M. (2001). A Critique of the IMF’S Role and Policy Conditionality. Global Economy Series, 4. Retrieved from http://www.twnside.org.sg/title/geseries4.htm

  • Koelble, T. A. (2007). Globalization and Democratization: The Prospects for Social Democracy in South Africa. Politikon: South African Journal of Political Studies, 26(2), 259–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kombo Mason, B. (2003). Modes of Deregulation in the Downstream Sector of the Nigerian Petroleum Industry. Port Harcourt, November 18. Retrieved from http://www.gamji.com/kombo/kombo11.htm

  • Kupolokun, F. (2004). Downstream Regulation: Achievements and Emerging Challenges. Retrieved from http://www.pppra-nigeria.org/articledetails.asp?ArticleID=5

  • Kura, S. Y. B. (2005). Globalization and Democracy: A Dialectical Framework for Understanding Democratization in Nigeria. Globalization, 5(1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Larbi, G. A. (1999). The New Public Management Approach and Crisis States. UNRISD Discussion Paper No 112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, Q., & Reuveny, R. (2003). Economic Globalization and Democracy: An Empirical Analysis. British Journal of Political Science, 33(1, Cambridge University Press), 29–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, G. (2004). Africa’s New Strategic Significance. The Washington Quarterly, Autumn, 157–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mimiko, N. O. (2009). Corruption and Its Outcome: The Terra Nullius Complex in Nigeria. Osun College of Education Journal, 1(3), 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mimiko, N. O. (2010). Swimming Against the Tide: Development Challenges for the Long-Disadvantaged in a Fundamentally Skewed Global System. Inaugural Lecture Series 233, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, October 12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nabudere, W. D. (2000). Globalization, the African Post-Colonial State. In W. D. Nabudere (Ed.), Globalization and the Post-Colonial African State (pp. 13–55). Harare: AAPS.

    Google Scholar 

  • NewsRescue. (2012). IMF Forces African Nations to Remove Fuel Subsidies. Retrieved from http://www.newsrescue.com/2012/01/imf-forces-african-nations-to-remove-fuel-subsidies/#axzz1qbfNIR00

  • Ojo, B. A (2004). Africa’s Triple Dilemma: The State, Democratization and the Challenges of Globalization. Retrieved from http://www.beyondintractability.org/ citations/12244

  • Oronto, D. (2003). Alienation and Militancy in the Niger Delta: A Response to CSIS on Petroleum, Politics and Democracy in Nigeria. Foreign Policy Focus, July 21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pevehouse, J. C. (2002). Democracy from the Outside-In? International Organizations and Democratization. International Organization, 56(3), 515–549.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stein, H., & Wayne, N. (1991). Structural Adjustment, Human Needs, and the World Bank Agenda. The Journal of Modern African Studies, 29(1), 173–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, J. E. (2002). Globalization and Its Discontents. New York: WW Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rapley, J. (2004). Globalization and Inequality: Neoliberalism’s Downward Spiral. London: Lynne Rienner Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rejai, M. (1995). Political Ideologies: A Comparative Approach. Ohio: M.E. Sharpe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robert, W. O. (2010). The Impact of Global Institutions Imposed Economic Reforms on Nigeria Economy. Research Journal of International Studies, Issue 17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, B. C. (2003). Understanding Third World Politics: Theories of Political Change and Development. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone, R. W. (2007). The Scope of IMF Conditionality. University of Rhochester, March 16. Retrieved from https://www.princeton.edu/~pcglobal/conferences/institutions/papers/stone_S100.pdf

  • Umezurike, C. (2012). Globalisation, Economic Reforms and Democracy in Nigeria. Africa Development, XXXVII(2), 25–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uzodike, U. O. (1996). Democracy and Economic Reforms: Developing Underdeveloped Political Economies. Journal of African Asian Studies, XXXI(1–2), 21–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uzodike, U. O. (2009). Leadership and Governance in Africa. Affrika: Journal of Politics, Economics and Society, 1, 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. (1997). The State in a Changing World. World Development Report. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Akinola, A.O. (2018). Introduction. In: Globalization, Democracy and Oil Sector Reform in Nigeria. African Histories and Modernities. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70184-4_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70184-4_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-70183-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-70184-4

  • eBook Packages: HistoryHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics