Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

InterPlayces: Results of an Intergenerational Games Study

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Serious Games (JCSG 2017)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 10622))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Our submission describes the conceptualization and the results of an intergenerational games study composed of various games held in the Welios Science Center. We aim to identify design criteria (game mechanics, goals, etc.) for intergenerational digital games with haptic elements in a museum context that are not only fun, but also foster the communication between old and young players. In order to reach our goal, we confronted players with several different commercially available games as well as a specifically developed game prototype. To address the physical context (museum) in our methods and our game design we also carried out observations of existing installations plus interviews with museum guides. Results show that cooperative intergenerational games in a museum should include haptic elements, consist of several phases, with the possibility of reruns and should not be too complex, both technically and conceptually.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://www.who.int/mediacentre/news/releases/2015/older-persons-day/en/.

  2. 2.

    http://www.welios.at/.

  3. 3.

    http://www.smartgames.eu/.

  4. 4.

    http://www.spore.com/creatureCreator.

  5. 5.

    http://www.rovio.com/.

  6. 6.

    https://www.angrybirds.com/.

  7. 7.

    http://preloaded.com/games/rugged-rovers/.

  8. 8.

    http://boxbuddies.rohschinken.at/en/.

References

  1. Chua, P.H., Jung, Y., Lwin, M.O., Theng, Y.L.: Let’s play together: effects of video-game play on intergenerational perceptions among youth and elderly participants. Comput. Hum. Behav. 29(6), 2303–2311 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.04.037

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Gajadhar, B.J., Nap, H.H., de Kort, Y.A.W., IJsselsteijn, W.A.: Out of sight, out of mind: co-player effects on seniors’ player experience. In: Proceedings of 3rd International Conference on Fun and Games, Fun and Games 2010, pp. 74–83. ACM, New York (2010). https://doi.org/10.1145/1823818.1823826

  3. Hornecker, E., Stifter, M.: Learning from interactive museum installations about interaction design for public settings. In: Proceedings of 18th Australia Conference on Computer-Human Interaction: Design: Activities, Artefacts and Environments. OZCHI 2006, pp. 135–142. ACM, New York (2006). https://doi.org/10.1145/1228175.1228201

  4. IJsselsteijn, W., De Kort, Y., Poels, K.: The game experience questionnaire (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ijsselsteijn, W., Nap, H.H., de Kort, Y., Poels, K.: Digital game design for elderly users. In: Proceedings of 2007 Conference on Future Play, Future Play 2007, pp. 17–22. ACM, New York (2007). https://doi.org/10.1145/1328202.1328206

  6. Jennett, C., Cox, A.L., Cairns, P.: Investigating computer game immersion and the component real world dissociation. In: CHI 2009 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI EA 2009, pp. 3407–3412. ACM, New York (2009). https://doi.org/10.1145/1520340.1520494

  7. Khoo, E.T., Merritt, T., Cheok, A.D.: Designing physical and social intergenerational family entertainment. Interacting with Computers 21(12), 76–87 (2009). special issue: Enactive Interfaces Physicality & Interaction. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0953543808000702

  8. Kooiman, B.J., Sheehan, D.P.: Intergenerational remote exergaming with family and friends for health and leisure. J. Intergener. Relatsh. 12(4), 413–424 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1080/15350770.2014.962442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Loos, E.: Designing meaningful intergenerational digital games. In: International Conference on Communication, Media, Technology and Design, pp. 46–51 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Mahmud, A.A., Mubin, O., Shahid, S., Martens, J.B.: Designing social games for children and older adults: two related case studies. Entertain. Comput. 1(3–4), 147–156 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Markopoulos, P., Read, J.C., MacFarlane, S., Hoysniemi, J.: Evaluating Children’s Interactive Products: Principles and Practices for Interaction Designers. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Osmanovic, S., Pecchioni, L.: Beyond entertainment. Games Cult. 11(1–2), 130–149 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1177/1555412015602819

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Read, J.C., MacFarlane, S.: Using the fun toolkit and other survey methods to gather opinions in child computer interaction. In: Proceedings of 2006 Conference on Interaction Design and Children, IDC 2006, pp. 81–88. ACM, New York (2006). https://doi.org/10.1145/1139073.1139096

  14. Rice, M., Tan, W.P., Ong, J., Yau, L.J., Wan, M., Ng, J.: The dynamics of younger and older adult’s paired behavior when playing an interactive silhouette game. In: Proceedings of SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI 2013, pp. 1081–1090. ACM, New York (2013). https://doi.org/10.1145/2470654.2466138

  15. Ryan, R.M., Deci, E.L.: Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. Am. Psychol. 55, 68–78 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ryan, R.M., Mims, V., Koestner, R.: Relation of reward contingency and interpersonal context to intrinsic motivation: a review and test using cognitive evaluation theory. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 45(4), 736–750 (1983)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Schutter, B.D.: Never too old to play: the appeal of digital games to an older audience. Games Cult. 6(2), 155–170 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1177/1555412010364978

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Vanden Abeele, V., Schutter, B.: Designing intergenerational play via enactive interaction, competition and acceleration. Pers. Ubiquitous Comput. 14(5), 425–433 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-009-0262-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Vanden Abeele, V.A., Van Rompaey, V.: Introducing human-centered research to game design: designing game concepts for and with senior citizens. In: CHI 2006 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI EA 2006, pp. 1469–1474. ACM, New York (2006). https://doi.org/10.1145/1125451.1125721

  20. Vetere, F., Davis, H., Gibbs, M., Howard, S.: The magic box and collage: responding to the challenge of distributed intergenerational play. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud. 67(2), 165–178 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2008.09.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Voida, A., Greenberg, S.: Console gaming across generations: exploring intergenerational interactions in collocated console gaming. Univers. Access Inf. Soc. 11(1), 45–56 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-011-0232-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research has been funded by the project InterPlayces: Intergenerational Co-located Play for Old and Young (contract no. 850843), funded by the Austrian Research Promotion Agency.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Digital Media, University of Applied Sciences Upper Austria, Softwarepark 11, 4232, Hagenberg, Austria

    Michael Lankes & Jürgen Hagler

  2. Department of Education and Psychology, Johannes Kepler University Linz, Altenberger Straße 69, 4040, Linz, Austria

    Fabiola Gattringer & Barbara Stiglbauer

Authors
  1. Michael Lankes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jürgen Hagler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Fabiola Gattringer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Barbara Stiglbauer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Lankes .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Polytechnic University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain

    Mariano Alcañiz

  2. Technische Universität Darmstadt, Darmstadt, Germany

    Stefan Göbel

  3. Staffordshire University, Stoke on Trent, United Kingdom

    Minhua Ma

  4. SINTEF Technology and Society, Trondheim, Norway

    Manuel Fradinho Oliveira

  5. University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany

    Jannicke Baalsrud Hauge

  6. Griffith University, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia

    Tim Marsh

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Lankes, M., Hagler, J., Gattringer, F., Stiglbauer, B. (2017). InterPlayces: Results of an Intergenerational Games Study. In: Alcañiz, M., Göbel, S., Ma, M., Fradinho Oliveira, M., Baalsrud Hauge, J., Marsh, T. (eds) Serious Games. JCSG 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10622. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70111-0_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70111-0_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-70110-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-70111-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation