Advertisement

Delivering Solutions: Engaging Farmers and Land Holders in the Climate Change Debate

  • Becky WillsonEmail author
  • Stephen Roderick
Chapter
Part of the Climate Change Management book series (CCM)

Abstract

Much of the focus of government policy for climate change mitigation focusses on changing behaviour and management practices of the general public and other stakeholders. This paper focusses on the opportunities and strategies employed to engage a crucial group of stakeholders that are pivotal to future policy success: farmers and landholders. In order to achieve emissions reduction targets, farmers must adapt their management and engage with sustainable farming practices.A key part of achieving this action is knowledge generation and knowledge transfer, not just between research and industry, but also the sharing of best practice between farmers. There is a lack of research and understanding into how knowledge on climate change mitigation and adaptation needs to be framed and delivered for farmers. This is a crucial part of the puzzle to equip farmers with the skills, knowledge and resources to deliver results on-farm and be part of the collective solution.This paper presents results from work undertaken by a UK farming organisation, the Farm Carbon Cutting Toolkit (FCCT), which works with farmers and growers to inform, enable and encourage them to reduce their greenhouse gas emissions, improve carbon sequestration levels and future proof their business. The paper examines the effectiveness of two specific campaigns run by FCCT at engaging farmers with climate change and increasing understanding of practical mitigation options available to them on-farm. It identifies potential strategies to effectively communicate the issues in such a way that allows farmers to improve their knowledge, and change farm management practices. The results from this work indicate that through targeting one particular issue (soil management), the campaign was able to realign the climate change messages with practical on-farm management and receive a higher level of interest than generic messages about agriculture and climate change.

Keywords

Climate change Farmers Knowledge transfer Soil management Greenhouse gas emissions 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Thank you to all the farmers who attended the technical and soil farmer events and responded to positively to requests for feedback. Thank you to the demo farmers, and the self-assessment farmers for engaging with the project and providing your opinions so readily as well as the FCCT team.

References

  1. AHDB Cereals and Oilseeds (2016) The Monitor Farm Programme. Retrieved from https://cereals.ahdb.org.uk/get-involved/monitor-farms.aspx. Last accessed 12 Dec 2016
  2. Blackstock KL, Dwyer J, Ingram J (2007) Negotiating change: the importance of knowledge networks in mitigating diffuse pollution. Paper given at the CAIWA conference, Basel, 11–15 Nov 2007Google Scholar
  3. Dawson J, Smith P (2010) Integrative management to mitigate diffuse pollution in multi-functional landscapes. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 2:375–382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Defra (2013) Agricultural statistics and climate change (4th ed). Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/225181/agriclimate-4edition-30jul13.pdf. Last accessed 12 Dec 2016
  5. Fleming A, Vanclay F (2010) Farmer responses to climate change and sustainable agriculture. A review. Agron Sustain Dev 30(1):12–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Greiner R, Patterson L, Miller O (2009) Motivations, risk perceptions and adoption of conservation practices by farmers. Agric Syst 99:86–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hansen BG (2015) Financial extension that challenges farmers’ thinking in discussion clubs helps farmers improve their problem solving abilities. Agric Syst 132:85–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Helm D (2008) Climate change policy: why has so little been achieved? Oxf Rev Econ Policy 24(2):211–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ingram J, Maye D, Kirwan J, Curry N, Kubinakova K (2015) Interactions between niche and regime: an analysis of learning and innovation networks for sustainable agriculture across Europe. J Agric Educ Ext 21(1):55–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Le Gal P, Dugue P, Faure G, Novak S (2011) How does research address the design of innovative agricultural production systems at the farm level? A review. Agric Syst 104:714–72Google Scholar
  11. Leitgeb F, Funes-Monzote FR, Kummer S, Vogl CR (2011) Contribution of farmers’ experiments and innovations to Cuba’s agricultural innovation system. Renew Agric Food Syst 26(4):354–367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. MacMillan T, Benton T (2014) Engage farmers in research. Nature 509:25–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Nowak P (2013) Thinking about a future conservation agenda. J Soil Water Conserv 68:50A–52ACrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. OECD (2012) Introduction to farmer management practices. In: Farmer behaviour, agricultural management and climate change. OECD Publishing, ParisGoogle Scholar
  15. Wall E, Smit B (2005) Climate change adaptation in light of sustainable agriculture. J Sustain Agric 27(1):113–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Wood BA, Blair HT, Gray DI, Kemp PD, Kenyon PR, Morris ST, Sewell AM (2014) Agricultural science in the wild: a social network analysis of farmer knowledge exchange. PLoS ONE 9(8):e105203CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Rural Business SchoolDuchy CollegeCallingtonUK
  2. 2.The Farm Carbon Cutting ToolkitColeshill, Highworth, SwindonUK

Personalised recommendations