Climate Change and Renewable Energy: Opinions and Emotions of Elementary School Pupils in the Prefecture of Evros

  • Sideri Lefkeli
  • Georgios Tsantopoulos
  • Evangelos ManolasEmail author
Part of the Climate Change Management book series (CCM)


Climate change is one of the most serious contemporary problems of our planet. Efforts to reduce the impact of climate change are crucial. The consequences of rising global temperatures will be very serious for humans and the environment unless urgent action is taken everywhere to reduce emissions. Renewable energy is very important in mitigating global greenhouse gas emissions by radically lowering the emissions profile of the planet’s energy system. In addition, beyond the use of renewable energy sources, the materialization of a sustainable energy future also requires citizen participation in decision making processes. For this purpose all bodies responsible for the realization of a sustainable future, such as schools and means of mass communication, need to equip people with the knowledge, attitudes and skills they need to successfully deal with the challenges in front of them. The aim of this chapter is to investigate the opinions and emotions of elementary school pupils with regard to climate change and renewable sources of energy. For the collection of data a semi-structured questionnaire and cluster sampling were used and 632 questionnaires were completed by pupils of 5th grade (aged 11) and 6th grade (aged 12) in 17 elementary schools in the Prefecture of Evros. The research was carried out in May and June 2016. The results of the research showed that 56.5% of the pupils think that in order to deal successfully with many environmental problems, the use of renewable sources of energy is very important. In particular, boys as opposed to girls, think that renewable energy sources play a key role in dealing with environmental problems, and 5th grade pupils think that renewable energy sources are very important for the protection of the natural environment, as opposed to 6th grade pupils who think otherwise. The investigation with regard to the emotions of pupils as far as the issue of climate change is concerned, revealed that what most pupils feel, is interesting with regard to how this matter will evolve. Also, from the two factors extracted the first contains “positive emotions” and the second “negative emotions”. In the first factor belong the variables concern, fear and interest and in the second factor belong the variables pessimism, anger and anxiety. Finally, almost one in three pupils usually or always expresses his concern regarding the consequences of climate change, is not at all optimistic about climate change and usually or always expresses the anxiety he feels regarding the various dimensions of the issue. In addition, regarding the impacts of climate changes one in two pupils feels fear or anger.


Elementary education Opinions and emotions of pupils Climate change Renewable sources of energy 


  1. Cattell RB (1978) The scientific use of factor analysis in behavioral and life sciences. Plenum, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Creighton JL (1983) The use of values: public participation in the planning process. In: Daneke GA, Garcia MW, Delli Priscolli J (eds) Public involvement and social impact assessment. Westview Press, Boulder, pp 143–160Google Scholar
  3. de Leeuw A, Valois P, Seixas R (2014) Understanding high school students attitude, social norm, perceived control and beliefs to develop educational interventions on sustainable development. Procedia Soc Behav Sci 143:1200–1209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Derevenskaia O (2014) Active learning methods in environmental education of students. Procedia Soc Behav Sci 131:101–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. DeWaters J, Qaqish B, Graham M, Powers S (2013) Designing an energy literacy questionnaire for middle and high school youth. J Environ Educ 44(1):56–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dias AR, Mattos CR, Balestieri JAP (2006) The limits of human development and the use of energy and natural resources. Energ Policy 34(9):1026–1031CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dimaki A, Chaitopoulou I, Papapanou I, Ravanis K (2008) Gender and the teaching of physical sciences: a qualitative analysis of the perceptions of future kindergarten teachers. In: Koumaras P, Seroglou F (eds) Proceedings of the 4th national conference of the Union for the teaching of physical sciences. Christodoulidis Publications, Thessaloniki, pp 514–523Google Scholar
  8. Frangos CK (2004) Methodology of market research and data analysis with the use of the statistical package SPSS for windows. Interbooks Publications, AthensGoogle Scholar
  9. Frantz CM, Mayer CM (2014) The importance of connection to nature in assessing environmental education programs. Stud Educ Eval 41:85–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Freund R, Wilson W (2003) Statistical methods. Elsevier, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  11. Gajibo IA (2016) Developing a framework for generation of energy from waste through anaerobic digestion in Nigeria: case study—Abuja. University of Abertay DundeeGoogle Scholar
  12. Harman HH (1976) Modern factor analysis. The University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  13. Ho R (2006) Handbook of univariate and multivariate data analysis and interpretation with SPSS. Chapman & Hall, FloridaCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kalkanis G (1997) Energy and its sources, vol II. Centre for Renewable Sources of Energy, Department of Development, General Secretariat for Research and Technology “Open Doors”, AthensGoogle Scholar
  15. Kandpal TC, Broman L (2014) Renewable energy education: a global status review. Renew Sust Energ Rev 34:300–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Karatayev M, Clarke ML (2016) A review of current energy systems and green energy potential in Kazakhstan. Renew Sust Energ Rev 55:491–504CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Karatepe Y, Nese SV, Kecebas A, Yumurtaci M (2012) The levels of awareness about the renewable energy sources of university students in Turkey. Renew Energ 44Google Scholar
  18. Kousoulas G, Papazisi C (2009) The journey goes on … From environmental education for the environment and sustainability. Directorate of Secondary Education of Athens B region. Thita Publications, AthensGoogle Scholar
  19. Lazarus RS (1991) Emotion and adaptation. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 174–179Google Scholar
  20. Lopez-Gorosave G, Giron MH (2013) Leading environmental education in elementary schools: the case of “La Esperanza” School. In: Slater CL, Nelson SW (ed) Understanding the principalship: an international guide to principal preparation chapter 12 (Advances in educational administration, volume 19). Emerald Group Publishing Limited, pp 269–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mandler G (1984) Mind and body: psychology of emotion and stress. Norton, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  22. Manolas E (2015) Climate change: challenges for the 210 century. Vol 7: climate change: interdisciplinary approaches. Themes in Forestry and Management of the Environment and Natural Resources, pp 161–168Google Scholar
  23. Ntona E, Arabatzis G, Kyriakopoulos G (2015) Energy saving: views and attitudes of students in secondary education. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 46:1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Sharma S (1996) Applied multivariate techniques. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  25. Siardos G (1999) Multivariate statistical analysis methods. Part I: exploring the relations among variables. Zitis Publications, ThessalonikiGoogle Scholar
  26. Skanavis C (2004a) Environment and society: a relationship in continuous progress. Kalidoskopio, AthensGoogle Scholar
  27. Skanavis C (2004b) Environment and communication: having the right to choose. Kalidoskopio, AthensGoogle Scholar
  28. Teixeira SR (2013) The environmental education as a path for global sustainability. Procedia Soc Behav Sci 106: 2769–2774CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Uitto A, Seppo S (2010) The relationship between secondary school students environmental and human values, attitudes, interests and motivations. Procedia Soc Behav Sci 9:1866–1872CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Vardoulakis S, Dimitropoulou C, Thornes J, Ka-Man L, Taylor J, Isabella M, Heaviside C, Mavrogianni A, Shrubsole C, Chalabi Z, Davies M, Wilkinson P (2015) Impact of climate change on the domestic indoor environment and associated health risks in the UK. Environ Int 85:299–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Zerva Α, Tsantopoulos G (2013) Public opinion on climate change in international and local scale. In: Manolas EI, Protopapadakis ED, Tsantopoulos GE (eds) Vol 5: international environmental politics: encounters with the future. Themes in Forestry and Management of the Environment and Natural Resources, pp 75–89Google Scholar
  32. Zografakis N, Menegaki A, Tsagarakis K (2008) Effective education for energy efficiency. Energ Policy 36(8):3226–3232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Zsoka A, Szerenyi Z, Szechy A, Kocsis T (2013) Greening due to environmental education? Environmental knowledge, attitudes, consumer behavior and everyday pro-environmental activities of Hungarian high school and university students. J Clean Prod 48:126–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sideri Lefkeli
    • 1
  • Georgios Tsantopoulos
    • 1
  • Evangelos Manolas
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Forestry and Management of the Environment and Natural Resources, School of Agricultural and Forestry SciencesDemocritus University of ThraceOrestiadaGreece

Personalised recommendations