Advertisement

Modelling Under Varying Flows

  • Anacleto RizzoEmail author
  • Tamás Gábor Pálfy
  • Nicolas Forquet
Chapter
Part of the SpringerBriefs in Water Science and Technology book series (BRIEFSWATER)

Abstract

Constructed wetlands (CWs) subjected to variable loads present a series of challenges for designers and researchers. Classical design approaches (e.g. rule of thumbs or first-order kinetic model) are not suited to properly estimate the removal efficiencies of CWs under varying flows. The internal removal processes of CWs are expected to be influenced by the variation of influent pollutant concentrations and hydraulic loads for particular CW applications (e.g. stormwater or combined sewer overflow treatment). A powerful tool to properly study and design CWs under varying flows is given by mathematical model. Either for design or research purposes, mathematical models have been developed to simulate CWs subjected to varying flow and are revised in this chapter. Models used to simulate the hydraulic behaviour as well as the treatment performances of variable-flow CWs are reviewed. Moreover, future perspectives of mathematical models in this field are analysed in terms of design-support tools, process-based model for design purposes, and limitation for a wider application.

References

  1. Fletcher TD, Andrieu H, Hamel P (2013) Understanding, management and modelling of urban hydrology and its consequences for receiving waters: a state of the art. Adv Water Resour 51:261–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Fournel J, Forquet N, Molle P, Grasmick A (2013) Modeling constructed wetlands with variably saturated vertical subsurface-flow for urban stormwater treatment. Ecol Eng 55:1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Galvão A, Matos J (2012) Response of horizontal sub-surface flow constructed wetlands to sudden organic load changes. Ecol Eng 49:123–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Henrichs M, Langergraber G, Uhl M (2007) Modelling of organic matter degradation in 11 constructed wetlands for treatment of combined sewer overflow. Sci Total Environ 380:196–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Henrichs M, Welker A, Uhl M (2009) Modelling of biofilters for ammonium reduction in 13 combined sewer overflows. Water Sci Technol 60(3):825–831CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Henze M, Gujer W, Mino T, Loosdrecht M (2000) Activated sludge models ASM1, ASM2, ASM2d and ASM3. IWA Publishing, LondonGoogle Scholar
  7. Kadlec RH (2001) Phosphorus dynamics in event driven wetlands. Transformations of nutrients in natural and constructed wetlands. Backhuys Publishers, Leiden, pp 365–391Google Scholar
  8. Kadlec RH (2010) Nitrate dynamics in event-driven wetlands. Ecol Eng 36:503–516CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kadlec RH (2012) Constructed marshes for nitrate removal. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol 42:934–1005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kadlec RH, Reddy KR (2001) Temperature effects in treatment wetlands. Water Environ Res 73(5):543–557CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kadlec R, Wallace S (2009) Treatment wetlands, 2nd edn. CRC Press, Taylor & Francis GroupGoogle Scholar
  12. Langergraber G, Šimůnek J (2005) Modeling variably-saturated water flow and multi-component reactive transport in constructed wetlands. Vadose Zone J 4(4):924–938CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Langergraber G, Šimůnek J (2012) Reactive transport modelling of subsurface flow constructed wetlands using the HYDRUS wetland module. J Vadose Zone 11(2), special issueGoogle Scholar
  14. Maier U, DeBiase C, Baeder-Bederski O, Bayer P (2009) Calibration of hydraulic parameters for large-scale vertical flow constructed wetlands. J Hydrol 369:260–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Masi F, Rizzo A, Bresciani R, Conte G (2016) Constructed wetlands for combined sewer overflow treatment: ecosystem services at Gorla Maggiore, Italy. Ecol Eng 98:427–438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Meyer D (2011) Modellierung und Simulation von Retentionsbodenfiltern zur weitergehenden Mischwasserbehandlung (Modelling and simulation of constructed wetlands for combined sewer overflow treatment). Dissertation, TU KaiserslauternGoogle Scholar
  17. Meyer D, Dittmer U (2015) RSF_Sim—a simulation tool to support the design of constructed wetlands for combined sewer overflow treatment. Ecol Eng 80:198–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Meyer D, Esser D, Troesch S, Masi F, Dittmer U (2013) Constructed wetlands for 27 combined sewer overflow treatment—comparison of German, French and Italian approaches. Water 5:1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Meyer D, Chazarenc F, Claveau-Mallet D, Dittmer U, Forquet N, Molle P, Morvannou A, Pálfy T, Petitjean A, Rizzo A, Samsó R, Scholz M, Soric A, Langergraber G (2015) Modelling constructed wetlands: scopes and aims—a comparative review. Ecol Eng 80:205–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Morvannou A, Forquet N, Vanclooster M, Molle P (2013) Characterizing hydraulic properties of filter material of a vertical flow constructed wetland. Ecol Eng 60:325–335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Pálfy TG, Meyer D, Troesch S, Gourdon R, Molle P (2015a) Orage: simulation of planted detentive filters treating urban stormwater. In: Proceedings 6th International Symposium on Wetland Pollutant Dynamics and Control (WETPOL). Constructed Wetland Association and Cranfield University, York, UKGoogle Scholar
  22. Pálfy TG, Molle P, Langergraber G, Meyer D (2015b) Simulation of constructed wetlands treating combined sewer overflow using HYDRUS/CW2D. Ecol Eng 87:340–347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Pomiès M, Choubert JM, Wisniewski C, Coquery M (2013) Modelling of micropollutant removal in biological wastewater treatments: a review. Sci Total Environ 443:733–748CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Rajabzadeh AR, Legge RL, Weber KP (2015) Multiphysics modelling of flow dynamics, biofilm development and wastewater treatment in a subsurface vertical flow constructed wetland mesocosm. Ecol Eng 74:107–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Rizzo A, Langergraber G (2016) Novel insights on the response of horizontal flow constructed wetlands to sudden changes of influent organic load: a modeling study. Ecol Eng 93:242–249Google Scholar
  26. Rizzo A, Boano F, Revelli R, Ridolfi L (2013) Role of water flow in modeling methane emissions from flooded paddy soils. Adv Water Resour 52:61–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Rizzo A, Langergraber G, Boano F, Revelli R, Ridolfi L (2014) Modelling the response of laboratory horizontal flow constructed wetlands to unsteady organic loads with HYDRUS-CWM1. Ecol Eng 68:209–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Rizzo A, Boano F, Revelli R, Ridolfi L, Bresciani R, Masi F (2015) Additional ecological services of CSO-CW besides water treatment: modelling CSO-CW behaviour for urban runoff management. In: Proceedings 6th International Symposium on Wetland Pollutant Dynamics and Control (WETPOL). Constructed Wetland Association and Cranfield University, York, UKGoogle Scholar
  29. Samsó R, Garcia J (2013) BIO_PORE, a mathematical model to simulate biofilm growth and water quality improvement in porous media: Application and calibration for constructed wetlands. Ecol Eng 54:116–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Samsó R, Garcia J (2014) The Cartridge Theory: a description of the functioning of horizontal subsurface flow constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment, based on modelling results. Sci Total Environ 473:651–658CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Samsó R, Garcia J, Molle P, Forquet N (2016) Modelling bioclogging in variably saturated porous media and the interactions between surface/subsurface flows: Application to Constructed Wetlands. J Environ Manage 473:651–658Google Scholar
  32. Šimůnek J, van Genuchten MTh, Šejna M (2011) The HYDRUS software package for simulating the two- and three-dimensional movement of water, heat, and multiple solutes in variably-saturated media. Technical Manual, Version 2.0. PC Progress, Prague, Czech RepublicGoogle Scholar
  33. Tanner CC, Kadlec RH (2013) Influence of hydrological regime on wetland attenuation of diffuse agricultural nitrate losses. Ecol Eng 56:79–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Tondera K, Meyer D, Pinnekamp J (2013) Calibrating a simulation tool for constructed wetlands for combined sewer overflow treatment with field data. In: Proceedings 5th International Symposium on Wetland Pollutant Dynamics and Control (WETPOL). Ecole des Mines de Nantes and GEPEA, Nantes, FranceGoogle Scholar
  35. Walker WW, Kadlec RH (2011) Modeling phosphorus dynamics in everglades wetlands and stormwater treatment areas. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol 41(S1):430–446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Walsh CJ, Roy AH, Feminella JW, Cottingham PD, Groffman PM, Morgan RP II (2005) The urban stream syndrome: current knowledge and the search for a cure. J N Am Benthol Soc 24(3):706–723CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Wu S, Kuschk P, Brix H, Vymazal J, Dong R (2014) Development of constructed wetlands in performance intensifications for wastewater treatment: a nitrogen and organic matter targeted review. Water Res 57:40–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anacleto Rizzo
    • 1
    Email author
  • Tamás Gábor Pálfy
    • 2
  • Nicolas Forquet
    • 2
  1. 1.IRIDRA S.r.l.FlorenceItaly
  2. 2.Irstea—National Research Institute of Science and Technology for Environment and AgricultureVilleurbanneFrance

Personalised recommendations