Advertisement

Intake and Preparation of Malay Confinement Dietary Ontology Framework

  • Nur Liyana Lazim
  • Muhammad Hamiz Mohd RadziEmail author
  • Haryani Haron
  • Mohammad Bakri Che Haron
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10645)

Abstract

In the rapid development of science and technology, indigenous knowledge needs to be preserved to avoid the extinction of knowledge. Indigenous knowledge can be defined as the knowledge that is being used by the local people in a certain community to live. The indigenous knowledge that is widely used in Malaysia is the Malay Confinement Dietary (MCD). Confinement is the restrictions that are placed on the diets and practices for the mothers during the month right after the delivery of their baby. Mothers in confinement needs to consume confinement dishes to restore back their health. However, mothers in confinement might not get the correct nutrients due to the intake and preparation of the confinement dish. The knowledge of the intake and preparation of the confinement dish are based on the knowledge and experiences of the midwives which will lead to data extinction if it is not being preserved. Therefore, ontology framework to preserve the knowledge of the intake and preparation of MCD is proposed in this paper. By preserving this kind of knowledge, it can be valuable and useful for the future generation to get to know previous generation’s practice regarding MCD.

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful from the support to this work financially by UiTM Melaka.

References

  1. 1.
    Ajibade, L., Shokemi, O.: Indigenous approach to weather forecasting in Asa L.G.A. Kwara State, Nigeria. Indilinga: Afr. J. Indig. Knowl. Syst. 2, 37–44 (2009)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Fok, D., Aris, I., Ho, J., Lim, S., Chua, M., Pang, W., Saw, S., Kwek, K., Godfrey, K., Kramer, M., Chong, Y.: A comparison of practices during the confinement period among Chinese, Malay, and Indian mothers in Singapore. Birth 43, 247–254 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    William, S., Sears, M., Holt, L.H.: The Pregnancy Book: A Month-By-Month Guide. Little, Brown (1997)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
  5. 5.
    Bender, A.: Nutritional effects of food processing. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 1, 261–289 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wong, L., AbuBakar, S.: Health beliefs and practices related to dengue fever: a focus group study. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 7, e2310 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
  8. 8.
    Haron, H., Hamiz, M.: An ontological model for indigenous knowledge of Malay confinement dietary. J. Softw. 9, 1302 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Campbell, A.E., Shapiro, S.C.: Ontological mediation: an overview. In: Proceedings of IJCAI Workshop on Basic Ontological Issues in Knowledge Sharing (1995)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Noy, N.F., McGuinness, D.L.: Ontology development 101: a guide to creating your first ontology (2001)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Michael, G.: Ontology: applications and design. Commun. ACM. 45 (2002)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hamiz, M., Haron, H., Sanusi, A., Bakri, M.: Integration of Malay confinement dietary and phytochemicals ontology model. Adv. Sci. Lett. 4, 400–407 (2016)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Miller, P., Bakrania, M.: Mobilising the power of what you know: a practical guide to successful knowledge management. Century Business (1998)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Botha, A., Kourie, D., Snyman, R.: Coping with Continuous Change in the Business Environment. Elsevier Science, Burlington (2014)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wellman, J.: Organizational Learning: How Companies and Institutions Manage and Apply Knowledge. Palgrave Macmillan Ltd., London (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wyatt, J.: Management of explicit and tacit knowledge. J. Roy. Soc. Med. 94, 6–9 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Nonaka, I.: A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organ. Sci. 5, 14–37 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Rajasekaran, B., Warren, D., Babu, S.: Indigenous natural-resource management systems for sustainable agricultural development—a global perspective. J. Int. Dev. 3, 387–401 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Modern Science and Native Knowledge: Collaborative process that opens new perspective for PCST. http://www.raco.cat/index.php/quark/article/viewFile/55038/63353
  20. 20.
    Acharya, D., Shrivastava, A.: Indigenous herbal medicines. Aavishkar Publishers, Distributors, Jaipur (2008)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Gadgil, M., Berkes, F., Folke, C.: Indigenous knowledge for biodiversity conservation. Ambio. 22(2/3), 151–156 (1993). Biodiversity: Ecology, Economics, PolicyGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ajibade, L.: Knowing the unknown through the known: the case for indigenous knowledge in sustainable development. Afr. Res. Rev. 2, 218–233 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Barker, D., Indigenous knowledge. International encyclopedia of geography: people, the earth, environment and technology (2006)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Langill, S.: Indigenous knowledge: a resource kit for sustainable development researchers in dryland Africa (1999)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
  26. 26.
    Davenport, T.H.: Saving IT’s soul: human-centered information management. Harv. Bus. Rev. 72, 119–131 (1994)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Ruggles, R., Holtshouse, D.: The knowledge advantage. Capstone (1999)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Gómez-Pérez, A., Fernández-López, M., Corcho, O.: Ontological Engineering. Springer, London (2010)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Corcho, O., Fernández-López, M., Gómez-Pérez, A.: Ontological engineering. In: Semantic Web Services. 44–70 (2007)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Gruber, T.R.: A translation approach to portable ontology specifications. Knowl. Acquis. 5, 199–220 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Studer, R., Benjamins, V., Fensel, D.: Knowledge engineering: principles and methods. Data Knowl. Eng. 25, 161–197 (1998)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Borst, W.N.: Construction of Engineering Ontologies for Knowledge Sharing and Reuse. Centre for Telematics and Information Technology, Enschede (1997)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
  34. 34.
    Syed Jamaludin, S.: Beliefs and practices surrounding postpartum period among Malay women. In: Proceeding of Social Sciences Research ICSSR, pp. 409–417 (2014)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Zamani, A.: Traditional practices in postnatal care: the Malay community in Malaysia. Trinity Stud. Med. J. 2, 30–31 (2001). http://tsmj.ie/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/Traditional-Practices-In-Postnatal-Care-The-Malay-Community-In-Malaysia.pdf
  36. 36.
    Spritzler, F.: How cooking affects the nutrient content of foods. https://authoritynutrition.com/cookingnutrientcontent/
  37. 37.
    Tyagi, S.B., Kharkwal, M., Saxena, T.: Impact of cooking on nutritional content of food. DU J. Undergrad. Res. Innov. 1(3), 180–186 (2015)Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Fadzil, F., Shamsuddin, K., Ezat, S., Puteh, W.: Traditional postpartum practices among Malaysian mothers. J. Altern. Complement. Med. 19, 1–6 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1089/acm.2013.0469
  39. 39.
    Nutritional Effects of Food Processing. http://nutritiondata.self.com/topics/processing
  40. 40.
    Deraman, A.A., Wan Mohamad, W.R.: Adat dan pantang larang orang Melayu (Siri Penge). Penerbit Fajar Bakti, Selangor (1995)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nur Liyana Lazim
    • 1
  • Muhammad Hamiz Mohd Radzi
    • 1
    Email author
  • Haryani Haron
    • 2
  • Mohammad Bakri Che Haron
    • 1
  1. 1.Fakulti Sains Komputer & MatematikMerlimauMalaysia
  2. 2.Fakulti Sains Komputer & MatematikShah AlamMalaysia

Personalised recommendations