Skip to main content

Visualization Principles for Facilitating Strategy Development Process in the Organization

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNIP,volume 10645))

Abstract

Visualization is essential to facilitate human cognitive activities especially to handle information complexities. There is a huge effort to develop various kind of visualization tools in order to facilitate human cognitive activities in the organization. One of the major activity in the organization is the strategy development process (SDP). This activity often involves complex cognitive activities (CCA) and always happen in the collaborative settings in the organization. Therefore, it is essential for visualization to facilitate SDP from Collaborative-CCA perspectives. In order to do that, this paper intend to highlight three visualization principles that able to facilitate SDP in the organization. Using the systemic view as a fundamental, the visualization principles are; (i) higher level visual structure, (ii) lower level visual structure, and (iii) the interconnection between higher and lower level visual structure. Consequently, by applying focus group observation, this paper demonstrates the usefulness of the visualization principles in facilitating SDP. Finally, this research will further evaluate and consult current visualization techniques, methods and tools in facilitating SDP.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Yee, J., Walker, A., Menzfield, L.: The use of design visualisation methods to support decision making. In DS 70: Proceedings of 12th International Design Conference on DESIGN 2012, Dubrovnik, Croatia (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Platts, K., Eppler, M.: A framework for visualisation in the strategy process. In: Proceedings of 13th International Conference on Industry Engineering and Management Systems, Graz, Austria (2007) doi:10.1016/j.lrp.2008.11.005

  3. Bresciani, S., Blackwell, A.F., Eppler, M.: A collaborative dimensions framework: understanding the mediating role of conceptual visualizations in collaborative knowledge work. In: Proceedings of 41st Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, p. 364. IEEE (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hundhausen, C.D.: Evaluating visualization environments: cognitive, social and cultural perspectives. In: Huang, W. (ed.) Handbook of Human Centric Visualization, pp. 115–145. Springer, Heidelberg (2014). doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-7485-2

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Eppler, M.J., Burkhard, R.A.: Knowledge visualization. Università della Svizzera italiana (2004). doi:10.3929/ethz-a-005004486

  6. Kernbach, S., Eppler, M.J., Bresciani, S.: The use of visualization in the communication of business strategies: an experimental evaluation. Int. J. Bus. Commun. 52(2), 164–187 (2015). doi:10.1109/IV.2010.55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Sedig, K., Parsons, P., Dittmer, M., Haworth, R.: Human-centered interactivity of visualization tools: micro- and macro-level considerations. In: Huang, W. (ed.) Handbook of Human Centric Visualization, pp. 717–743. Springer, New York (2014). doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-7485-2

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Schleicher, D.J., McConnell, A.R.: The complexity of self–complexity: an associated systems theory approach. Soc. Cogn. 23(5), 387–416 (2005). doi:10.1.1.669.6203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Krathwohl, D.R.: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy: an overview. Theory Pract. 41(4), 212–218 (2002). doi:10.1207/s15430421tip4104_2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ya’acob, S., Ali, N.M., Nayan, N.M.: Systemic visual structures: design solution for complexities of big data interfaces. In: Badioze Zaman, H., Robinson, P., Smeaton, A.F., Shih, T.K., Velastin, S., Jaafar, A., Mohamad Ali, N. (eds.) IVIC 2015. LNCS, vol. 9429, pp. 25–37. Springer, Cham (2015). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-25939-0_3

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Isenberg, P., Elmqvist, N., Scholtz, J., Cernea, D., Ma, K.L., Hagen, H.: Collaborative visualization: definition, challenges, and research agenda. Inf. Visual. 10(4), 310–326 (2011). doi:10.1177/1473871611412817

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Mengis, J., Eppler, M.J.: Understanding and managing conversations from a knowledge perspective: an analysis of the roles and rules of face-to-face conversations in organizations. Org. Stud. 29(10), 1287–1313 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ya’acob, S., Ali, N.M., Nayan, N.M.: Handling emergence of dynamic visual representation design for complex activities in the collaboration. Jurnal Teknologi 78(9–3), 1–11 (2016). doi:10.11113/jt.v78.9713

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kolfschoten, G.L., Brazier, F.M.: Cognitive load in collaboration: convergence. Group Decis. Negotiat. 22(5), 975–996 (2013). Springer. doi:10.1109/HICSS.2012.156

  15. Shneiderman, B.: The eyes have it: a task by data type taxonomy for information visualizations. In: Proceedings of IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages, pp. 336–343 (1996). doi:10.1109/VL.1996.545307

  16. Hornbæk, K., Hertzum, M.: The notion of overview in information visualization. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud. 69(7), 509–525 (2011). doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2011.02.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Corning, P.A.: The re-emergence of “emergence”: a venerable concept in search of a theory. Complexity 7(6), 18–30 (2002). doi:10.1002/cplx.10043

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Mengis, J.: Integrating knowledge through communication-the case of experts and decision makers. In: Proceedings of OKLC, pp. 699–720 (2007). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-02958-0_29

  19. A Systems Thinking Model: The Iceberg. https://www.nwei.org/iceberg/. Accessed June 2016

  20. Ziemkiewicz, C., Kosara, R.: Implied dynamics in information visualization. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces, pp. 215–222. ACM (2010). doi:10.1145/1842993.1843031

  21. Ziemkiewicz, C., Kosara, R.: Embedding information visualization within visual representation. In: Ras, Z.W., Ribarsky, W. (eds.) Advances in Information and Intelligent Systems. SCI, vol. 251, pp. 307–326. Springer, Heidelberg (2009). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-04141-9_15

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  22. Paas, F., Renkl, A., Sweller, J.: Cognitive load theory and instructional design: recent developments. Educ. Psychol. 38(1), 1–4 (2003). doi:10.1207/S15326985EP3801_1

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Suraya Ya’acob .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Ya’acob, S., Ali, N.M., Liang, HN., Zainuddin, N.M., Nayan, N.S.M. (2017). Visualization Principles for Facilitating Strategy Development Process in the Organization. In: Badioze Zaman, H., et al. Advances in Visual Informatics. IVIC 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10645. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70010-6_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70010-6_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-70009-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-70010-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics