Skip to main content

Coastal Risk: Concepts and Background

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Coastal Risk Assessment

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Oceanography ((BRIEFSOCEAN))

  • 358 Accesses

Abstract

The West Bengal coastal areas are the part of Bay of Bengal (BoB) , and it is geomorphologically and hydrologically dominated by the Ganga river system. This is being continually attacked by cyclones, storm surge, sea waves, sea level rise and long-shore tidal currents, which have caused terrific erosive transgression over the aerial and subaerial part of deltaic Sundarbans and littoral zones of Midnapore coast. In recent decades the coast is being ravaged by embankment breaching, submergence and flooding, beach erosion and siltation at protruding jetties and reduced channel navigation, are all aerial and subaerial hazardous processes making the coast prone to vulnerability and subsequent long-term coastal risk. Hence, the assessing of coastal risk is a crucial task for sustainable coastal zone management in terms of erosion, anthropogenic activities, violation of Coastal Regulation Zone (CRZ) rules (due to continuous erosion/accretion and lack cohesion and lobby), sea level fluctuation (due to combined effects of climatic, geologic and other physical process) and global warming and biosphere (exchange in atmosphere of trace gases). This chapter introduces the concept and background of coastal risk and different types of methodological approaches which are significant in managing the coastal environment of east coast .

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abuodha, P. A. O., & Woodroffe, C. D. (2010). Assessing vulnerability to sea level rise using a coastal sensitivity index: A case study from Southeast Australia. Journal of Coastal Conservation, 14(3), 189–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aid, U. (2009). Adapting to coastal climate change: A guidebook for development planners. Washington, DC: US Agency for International Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandopadhyay, S. (2000). Sagardwip: Some environmental problems and men. In: Bomkesh Maity (ed) Bish Sataker Sagardwip (20th Century Sagar Island), Quarterly April–June.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bickerstaff, K. (2004). Risk perception research: Socio-cultural perspectives on the public experience of air pollution. Environment International, 30, 827–840.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boruff, B. J., Emrich, C., & Cutter, S. L. (2005). Erosion hazard vulnerability of US coastal counties. Journal of Coastal Research, 21(5), 932–942.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Briguglio, L. (1995). Small island developing states and their economic vulnerabilities. World development, 23(9), 1615–1632.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cutter, S. L. (1996). Vulnerability to environmental hazards. Progress in Human Geography, 20(4), 529–539.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De la Cruz-Reyna, S. (1996). Long-term probabilistic analysis of future explosive eruptions. In Monitoring and Mitigation of Volcano Hazards (pp. 599–629). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fournier d’Albe, E. M. (1979). Earthquake prediction and risk management: Background paper. In Seminar on Earthquake Prediction, European Space/Council of Europe, Strasbourg

    Google Scholar 

  • Filatova, T., Voinov, A., & van der Veen, A. (2011). Land market mechanisms for preservation of space for coastal ecosystems: An agent-based analysis. Environmental Modelling & Software, 26(2), 179–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gornitz, V., Kouch, S., & Hartig, E. K. (2001). Impacts of sea level rise on New York City metropolitan area. Global and Planetary Change, 32(1), 61–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, N., Clouston, B., & Carvalho, P. (1999). Improving coastal vulnerability assessment methodologies for integrated coastal zone management: An approach from South Australia. Australian Geographical Studies, 37(1), 50–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IPCC-CZMS. (1992). A common methodology for assessing vulnerability to sea level rise-second revision. In Global climate change and the rising challenge of the sea. Report of the Coastal Zone Management Sub-Group. The Hague: IPCC Response Strategies Working Group, Ministry of Transport, Public Works, and Water Management, Appendix C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jayappa, K. S., Mitra, D., & Mishra, A. K. (2006). Coastal geomorphological and land‐use and land‐cover study of Sagar Island, Bay of Bengal (India) using remotely sensed data. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 27(17), 3671–3682.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonkman, S. N., van Gelder, P. H. A. J. M., & Vrijling, J. K. (2003). An overview of quantitative risk measures for loss of life and economic damage. Journal of Hazardous Materials, A99, 1–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kay, R. C., & Waterman, P. (1993). Review of the applicability of the ‘Common Methodology for Assessment of Vulnerability to Sea Level Rise’ to the Australian coastal zone. In McLean, R. F., & Mimura, N. (Eds.), Vulnerability assessment to sea level rise and coastal zone management (Proceedings of the IPCC Eastern Hemisphere workshop) (pp. 237–248). Tsukuba: Department of Environment, Sport, and Territories.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, R. J. T., & Nicholls, R. J. (1999). Assessment of coastal vulnerability to climate change. Ambio, 28(2), 182–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, T. S., Mahendra, R. S., Nayak, S., Radhakrishnan, K., & Sahu, K. C. (2010). Coastal vulnerability assessment for Orissa state, east coast of India. Journal of Coastal Research, 26(3), 523–534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larsen, R. K., Calgaro, E., & Thomalla, F. (2011). Governing resilience building in Thailand’s tourism-dependent coastal communities: Conceptualising stakeholder agency in social–ecological systems. Global Environmental Change, 21(2), 481–491.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loucks, D. P., & van Beek, E. (2005). Water resources systems planning and management an introduction to methods, models and applications. UNESCO and WL|Delft Hydraulics, ISBN 92-3-103998-9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renn, O. (1998). The role of risk perception for risk management. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 59, 49–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mukherjee, K. N. (1983). History of settlement in the Sundarbans. Indian Journal of Landscape Systems and Ecological Studies, 6, 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarma, K. V. L. N. S., Ramana, M. V., Subrahmanyam, V., Krishna, K. S., Ramprasad., T., & Desa M. (2000). Morphological features in the Bay of Bengal. Journal of Indian Geophysical Union, 4(2), 185–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, J., Taylor, R. B., Forbes, D. L., Ruz, M. H., & Solomon, S. (1998). Sensitivity of the coasts of Canada to sea-level rise. Geological Survey of Canada Bulletin, 505, 1–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • The M.S. Swaminathan Committee Report on Coastal Management Burnt. (2006). Integrated coastal zone management plan (p. 2p). Kerala Independent Fish Workers Federation (KSMTF): Trivandrum.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations. (2002). Living with risk: a global review of disaster reduction initiatives (Preliminary version). United Nations Publications: Geneva, Switzerland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vrijling, J. K., Van Hengel, W., & Houben, R. J. (1998). Acceptable risk as a basis for design. Reliability Engineering and Systems Safety, 59, 141–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wisner, B. (2000). Disaster management: What the United Nations Is doing, what it can do. United Nations Chronicle, 37(4), 6–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wisner, B. (2001). Vulnerability in disaster theory and practice: from soup to taxonomy, then to analysis and finally tool. In International Work-Conference Disaster Studies of Wagningen University and Research Centre.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ansar Khan .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Khan, A., Chatterjee, S. (2018). Coastal Risk: Concepts and Background. In: Coastal Risk Assessment. SpringerBriefs in Oceanography. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69992-9_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics