Skip to main content

HELENA Study: Reasons for Combining Agile and Traditional Software Development Approaches in German Companies

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Product-Focused Software Process Improvement (PROFES 2017)

Abstract

Many software development teams face the problem of selecting a suitable development approach fitting to their specific context. According to them, the combination of agile and traditional approaches seems to be the solution to handle this problem. However, the current state of practice with respect to hybrid approaches is not sufficiently examined. Most studies focus either on traditional or on agile methods, but the combination of both is not well investigated yet. The “Hybrid dEveLopmENt Approaches in software systems development” (HELENA) study performs a large-scale international survey in order to gain insights into the distribution of hybrid approaches. So far, the study indicates several reasons why companies combine agile and traditional approaches. The hybrid approaches aim at improving the frequency of delivery to customers, the adaptability and the flexibility of the process to react to change. Furthermore, it is the aim to increase the productivity. In this publication, we present the current state of the German results and outline the next steps.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Beck, K., Beedle, M., Van Bennekum, A., Cockburn, A., Cunningham, W., Fowler, M., Grenning, J., Highsmith, J., Hunt, A., Jeffries, R., et al.: Manifesto for Agile Software Development (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Boehm, B.: Get ready for agile methods, with care. Computer 35(1), 64–69 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Boehm, B., Turner, R.: Balancing Agility and Discipline: A Guide for the Perplexed, Portable Documents. Addison-Wesley Professional, Boston (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Diebold, P., Zehler, T.: The right degree of agility in rich processes. In: Kuhrmann, M., Münch, J., Richardson, I., Rausch, A., Zhang, H. (eds.) Managing Software Process Evolution, pp. 15–37. Springer, Cham (2016). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-31545-4_2

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Kuhrmann, M., Linssen, O.: Welche Vorgehensmodelle nutzt Deutschland? Projektmanagement und Vorgehensmodelle 2014, 17–32 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kuhrmann, M., Münch, J., Diebold, P., Linssen, O., Prause, C.R.: On the use of hybrid development approaches in software and systems development: construction and test of the HELENA survey. Projektmanagement und Vorgehensmodelle 2016, 59–68 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Theocharis, G., Kuhrmann, M., Münch, J., Diebold, P.: Is Water-Scrum-Fall reality? On the use of agile and traditional development practices. In: Abrahamsson, P., Corral, L., Oivo, M., Russo, B. (eds.) PROFES 2015. LNCS, vol. 9459, pp. 149–166. Springer, Cham (2015). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-26844-6_11

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jil Klünder .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Klünder, J. et al. (2017). HELENA Study: Reasons for Combining Agile and Traditional Software Development Approaches in German Companies. In: Felderer, M., Méndez Fernández, D., Turhan, B., Kalinowski, M., Sarro, F., Winkler, D. (eds) Product-Focused Software Process Improvement. PROFES 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10611. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69926-4_32

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69926-4_32

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-69925-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-69926-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics