Skip to main content

Use of Precedent as a Narrative Practice in Design Learning

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Educational Technology and Narrative

Abstract

In this chapter, we discuss narrative as a tool for designing, with regard particularly to how narrative may characterize precedent. Precedent is a critical form of design knowledge, comprising the designer’s awareness and experience, direct or vicarious, of existing designs. Precedent informs an understanding of a design space, affords the generation of design moves within those spaces, and facilitates the creation of new solutions. We describe the narrative character of precedent and illustrate the narrative nature and use of precedent via an empirical study of masters-level student designers as they began to understand and attempt to articulate the precedent relationships that were informing their design activity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abbott, H. P. (2008). The Cambridge introduction to narrative. Boston: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Boling, E. (2010). The need for design cases: Disseminating design knowledge. International Journal of Designs for Learning, 1(1), 1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boling, E., Gray, C. M., & Smith, K. M. (2015). Studio teaching in the low precedent context of instructional design. In LearnxDesign, 3rd international conference for design education researchers and PreK-16 design educators, Chicago, IL, 28–30 June 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boling, E., & Smith, K. M. (2014). Critical issues in studio pedagogy: Beyond the mystique and down to business. In B. Hokanson & A. Gibbons (Eds.), Design thinking, design processes, and the design studio. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boling, E., Smith, K. M., Siegel, M., & Parrish, P. (2013). Student goes on a journey; stranger rides into to the classroom: Narratives and the instructor in the design studio. Presented at the Design Research Society//cumulus Conference, Oslo, Norway.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breitschmid, M. (2010). In defense of the validity of the “canon” in architecture. In Proceedings of the panel “Still on the Margin: Reflections on the Perspective of the Canon in Architectural History.” 1st conference of the European Architectural History Network, Guimaraes, Portugal, 17–20 June 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, C. M. (in review). Ontologies of precedent in HCI research and practice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, C. M., Seifert, C. M., Yilmaz, S., Daly, S. R., & Gonzalez, R. (2016). What is the content of “design thinking”? Design heuristics as conceptual repertoire. International Journal of Engineering Education, 32(3B), 1349–1355.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawson, B. (2004). Schemata, gambits and precedent: Some factors in design expertise. Design Studies, 25(5), 443–457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawson, B. (2012). What designers know. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawson, B., & Dorst, K. (2013). Design expertise. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, H., & Stolterman, E. (2012). The design way: Intentional change in an unpredictable world. Boston: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oxman, R. (1994). A computational model for the organization of case knowledge of a design precedent. Design Studies, 15(2), 141–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, K.M. & Boling, E. (2009). What do we make of design? Design as a concept in educational technology. Educational Technology, July/August, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, K. M. (2010). Producing the rigorous design case. International Journal of Designs for Learning, 1(1), 9–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tulving, E. (1993). What is episodic memory? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 2, 67–70. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.ep10770899.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Visser, W. (1995). Use of episodic knowledge and information in design problem solving. Design Studies, 16(2), 171–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Colin M. Gray .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Boling, E., Gray, C.M. (2018). Use of Precedent as a Narrative Practice in Design Learning. In: Hokanson, B., Clinton, G., Kaminski, K. (eds) Educational Technology and Narrative. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69914-1_21

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69914-1_21

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-69913-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-69914-1

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics