Advertisement

Designing for Narrative-Like Learning Experiences

  • Michael T. Matthews
Chapter

Abstract

Recent emphasis in instructional design literature on the aesthetic qualities of learning experiences can be enhanced with tools and resources from other design fields similarly focused on designing experiences. Disney Imagineers create theme park experiences around some sort of story, and they often use storyboarding and methods like it to design the experiences beforehand. Though instructional designers likely do not have Disney’s physical or financial resources, this paper suggests that designers can nevertheless design for learning experiences that follow a narrative-like arc. Recommendations from instructional design scholars as well as others are brought to bear on the potential for narrative-like sequencing in designing for learning experiences. Practical support for designers is also offered to aid designers in making small but significant changes in their typical design work.

Keywords

Design Disney Experience Narrative Experience design Experience economy Sequence Storyboard 

References

  1. Boling, E., Eccarius, M., Smith, K., & Frick, T. W. (2004). Instructional illustrations: Intended meanings and learner interpretations. Journal of Visual Literacy, 24(2), 185–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Boling, E., & Gray, C. M. (2015). Designerly tools, sketching and instructional designers and the guarantors of design. In B. Hokanson, G. Clinton, & M. Tracey (Eds.), The design of learning experience: Creating the future of educational technology. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  3. Bruner, J. S. (1960). The process of education. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  4. Bunch, J. (1991). The storyboard strategy. Training and Development, 45(7), 69–71.Google Scholar
  5. Cates, W. M., & Bishop, M. J. (2003). Learner as bobsled operator: The physics of learner engagement. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 31(3), 291–305. https://doi.org/10.2190/JDGE-FP38-6MNM-300M.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Craddock, F. B. (2001). As one without authority. Atlanta, GA: Chalice Press.Google Scholar
  7. Craddock, F. B. (2002). Overhearing the gospel. Atlanta, GA: Chalice Press.Google Scholar
  8. Goodyear, P. (2005). Educational design and networked learning: Patterns, pattern languages, and design practice. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 21(1), 82–101. Retrieved from http://www.ascilite.org.au/ajet/ajet21/goodyear.html.Google Scholar
  9. Gray, C. M. (2015). Critiquing the role of the learner and context in aesthetic learning experiences. In B. Hokanson, G. Clinton, & M. W. Tracey (Eds.), The design of learning experience (pp. 199–213). New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16504-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hench, J., & van Pelt, P. (1998). Designing Disney: Imagineering and the art of the show. New York: Disney Editions, Inc..Google Scholar
  11. Immordino-Yang, M. H. (2016). Emotions, learning, and the brain: Exploring the educational implications of affective neuroscience. New York: W. W. Norton & Company, Inc.Google Scholar
  12. Jones, I. (2008). Storyboarding: A method for bootstrapping the design of computer-based educational tasks. Computers and Education, 51(3), 1353–1364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.01.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Knauf, R., Sakurai, Y., Tsuruta, S., & Jantke, K. P. (2010). Modeling didactic knowledge by storyboarding. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 42(4), 355–383. https://doi.org/10.2190/EC.42.4.a.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kolb, D. A. (1984/2014). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall Inc..Google Scholar
  15. Krippendorff, K. (1997). A trajectory of artificiality and new principles of design for the information age. In K. Krippendorff (Ed.), Design in the age of information: A Report to the National Science Foundation (NSF) (pp. 91–95). Raleigh, NC: School of Design, North Carolina State University. http://repository.upenn.edu/asc_papers/95.Google Scholar
  16. Lowry, E. L. (2000). The homiletical plot: The sermon as narrative art form. Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox Press.Google Scholar
  17. Matthews, M. T., & Yanchar, S. C. (2017a). Learner agency in educational technology learning theories. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
  18. Matthews, M. T. & Yanchar, S. C. (2017b). Instructional design as manipulation or cooperation? Questions designers can ask themselves. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
  19. Parrish, P. E. (2008). Plotting a learning experience. In L. Botturi & S. T. Stubbs (Eds.), Handbook of visual languages for instructional design: Theories and practices (pp. 91–111). Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference.Google Scholar
  20. Parrish, P. E. (2009). Aesthetic principles for instructional design. Educational Technology Research and Development, 57(4), 511–528. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-007-9060-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Parrish, P. E. (2014). Designing for the half-known world: Lessons for instructional designers from the craft of narrative fiction. In B. Hokanson & A. Gibbons (Eds.), Design in educational technology: Design thinking, design process, and the design studio (pp. 261–270). Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Parrish, P. E., Wilson, B. G., & Dunlap, J. C. (2011). Learning experience as transaction: A framework for instructional design. Educational Technology, 51(2), 15–22.Google Scholar
  23. Pine, B. J., II, & Gilmore, J. H. (1998). Welcome to the experience economy. Harvard Business Review, 76, 97–105.Google Scholar
  24. Pine, B. J., II, & Gilmore, J. H. (2011). The experience economy: Updated edition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  25. Prosperi, L. (2016). The Imagineering pyramid: Using Disney theme park design principles to develop and promote your creative ideas. www.themeparkpress.com, Theme Park Press.Google Scholar
  26. Reigeluth, C. M. (1999). The elaboration theory: Guidance for scope and sequence decisions. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory (Vol. 2, pp. 425–454). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  27. Reschly, A. L., & Christenson, S. L. (2012). Jingle, jangle, and conceptual haziness: Evolution and future directions of the engagement construct. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 3–19). New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Sappington, A. A. (1990). Recent psychological approaches to the free will versus determinism issue. Psychological Bulletin, 108(1), 19–29.Google Scholar
  29. Tyler, R. W. (1949). Basic principles of curriculum and instruction. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  30. van Merriënboer, J. J. G., Kirschner, P. A., & Kester, L. (2003). Taking the load off a learner’s mind: Instructional design for complex learning. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 5–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Wilson, B. G. (2013). A practice-centered approach to instructional design. In J. M. Spector, B. Lockee, S. Barbara, E. Smaldino, & M. C. Herring (Eds.), Learning, problem solving, and mindtools: Essays in honor of David H. Jonassen (pp. 35–54). New York: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  32. Wilson, B. G., & Parrish, P. E. (2011). Transformative learning experience: Aim higher, gain more. Educational Technology, 51(2), 10–15.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Brigham Young University–IdahoRexburgUSA

Personalised recommendations