Abstract
The growing needs to analyse and interpret large amounts of complex information has generalised the use of information about information, often called metainformation (or metadata). Metadata approaches and standards have proliferated in fields as diverse as medicine, meteorology, geography, cultural heritage or education, among others. These approaches are supposed to assist us in documenting our information by recording who has documented what, when and how, among other concerns, making the tasks of interpreting the data much easier. However, metadata approaches often suffer from a number of issues. To start with, there are too many, and users are often daunted by the task to choose among them. Secondly, metadata approaches seem to re-invent the wheel by assuming that metadata is essentially different to data (or metainformation to information) and for this reason needs a new and different set of languages and tools. Finally, many metadata approaches mix together conceptual concerns and implementation issues, thus violating well-known engineering principles of modularity and layering.
This paper presents a review of existing metadata approaches from a conceptual modelling perspective, identifies the major issues with them, and proposes a new approach based on the ConML conceptual modelling language. This new approach starts from the basis that metainformation is a particular kind of information and, as a consequence, everything that we know about information can also be applied to metainformation.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
References
Bargmeyer, B.E., Gillman, D.W.: Metadata standards and metadata registries: an overview. In: International Conference on Establishment Surveys II, Buffalo, New York (2000)
DCC, 004-2017: Digital Curation Centre, University of Edinburgh. http://www.dcc.ac.uk/resources/metadata-standards/list
Gonzalez-Perez, C.: A conceptual modelling language for the humanities and social sciences. In: Rolland, C., Castro, J., Pastor, O. (eds.) 2012 6th International Conference on Research Challenges in Information Science (RCIS), pp. 396–401. IEEE Computer Society (2012)
Gonzalez-Perez, C.: Modelling temporality and subjectivity in ConML. In: Wieringa, R., Nurcan, S. (eds.) 7th IEEE International Conference on Research Challenges in Information Science (RCIS 2013), pp. 1–6. IEEE Computer Society, Paris (2013)
Guizzardi, G., Wagner, G.: A unified foundational ontology and some applications of it in business modeling. In: Missikoff, M. (ed.) Enterprise Modelling and Ontologies for Interoperability, CEUR Workshop Proceedings, p. 125. CEUR-WS.org (2004)
Hodgins, W., Duval, E.: Draft standard for learning object metadata. IEEE 1484.12.1-2002 (2002). https://biblio.educa.ch/sites/default/files/20130328/lom_1484_12_1_v1_final_draft_0.pdf
Incipit: ConML Technical Specification. Incipit, CSIC (2016). http://www.conml.org/Resources_TechSpec.aspx
ISO: ISO 21127:2006 Information and Documentation – A Reference Ontology for the Interchange of Cultural Heritage Information (2006). https://www.iso.org/standard/34424.html
ISO: ISO 19115-1:2014 Geographic information – Metadata (2014). https://www.iso.org/standard/53798.html
ISO: ISO/IEC 11179, Information Technology – Metadata Registries (MDR) (2015). http://metadata-standards.org/11179/
ISO/IEC: Information Technology – Object Management Group Unified Modeling Language (OMG UML) Part 1: Infrastructure. ISO/IEC 19505-1:2012 (2012)
Liskov, B., Wing, J.M.: A behavioral notion of subtyping. ACM Trans. Program. Lang. Syst. 16(6), 1811–1841 (1994)
Digital Publications LLC: Glossary of Software Engineering Terms (2005). http://www.shellmethod.com/refs/seglossary.pdf
Macêdo, D.J., Shintaku, M., De Brito, R.F.: Dublin core usage for describing documents in Brazilian government digital libraries. In: International Conference on Dublin Core And Metadata Applications, pp. 129–135 (2015)
Malta, M.C., Baptista, A.A., Parente, C.: A DCAP for the social and solidarity economy. In: 2015 Proceedings of International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, DCMI, pp. 20–29 (2015)
Mendez, E., Van Hooland, S.: Metadata typology and metadata uses. In: Handbook of Metadata, Semantics and Ontologies, vol. 1 (2013)
Mougenot, I., Desconnets, J.-C., Chahdi, H.: A DCAP to promote easy-to-use data for multiresolution and multitemporal satellite imagery analysis. In: International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, pp. 10–19 (2015)
NISO: Understanding metadata. National Information Standards, p. 20 (2004)
Olsen, L.: Directory Interchange Format (DIF): writer’s guide
Park, J.-R., Childress, E.: Dublin core metadata semantics: an analysis of the perspectives of information professionals. J. Inf. Sci. 35(6), 727–739 (2009)
Powell, A., Nilsson, M., Naeve, A., Johnston, P.: DCMI Abstract Model (2007)
Radatz, J., Geraci, A., Katki, F.: IEEE standard glossary of software engineering terminology. IEEE Std. 610121990(121990), 3 (1990)
RDA: RDA Metadata Directory (2017). http://rd-alliance.github.io/metadata-directory/standards/
RDA: Research Data Alliance (2017). https://www.rd-alliance.org/
Riley, J.: Glossary of Metadata Standards. Indiana University Libraries (2010)
Robertson, W.D., Leadem, E.M., Dube, J., Greenberg, J.: Design and implementation of the national institute of environmental health sciences Dublin core metadata schema. In: International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, pp. 193–199 (2001)
Salvetti, O., Pieri, G., Di Bono, M.: WP9: a review of data and metadata standards and techniques for representation of multimedia content. MUSCLE. Network of Excellence FP6-5077-52 (2004)
Sicilia, M.-A.: Handbook of Metadata, Semantics and Ontologies. World Scientific, Singapore (2013)
Taylor, C.F., Field, D., Sansone, S.-A., Aerts, J., Apweiler, R., Ashburner, M., Ball, C.A., Binz, P.-A., Bogue, M., Booth, T.: Promoting coherent minimum reporting guidelines for biological and biomedical investigations: the MIBBI project. Nat. Biotechnol. 26(8), 889–896 (2008)
Tort, A., Olivé, A.: A computer-guided approach to website Schema.org design. In: Yu, E., Dobbie, G., Jarke, M., Purao, S. (eds.) ER 2014. LNCS, vol. 8824, pp. 28–42. Springer, Cham (2014). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-12206-9_3
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Gonzalez-Perez, C., Martin-Rodilla, P. (2017). An Alternative Approach to Metainformation Conceptualisation and Use. In: Mayr, H., Guizzardi, G., Ma, H., Pastor, O. (eds) Conceptual Modeling. ER 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10650. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69904-2_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69904-2_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-69903-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-69904-2
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)