Abstract
The very process of establishing an archaeological site is a grand exercise in boundary-making. Not only must formal physical boundaries be determined but there are also boundaries between staff and visitors, between educational or ritual use and commercial exploitation, and allocations of authority as exercised by different levels or branches of government. Even where practice or existing rules facilitate boundary-making the particular characteristics of a place or a historical moment make management of boundary zones, or the site-society interface, arenas of critical concern. Through exploration of the evolution of the boundary-making process at the World Heritage Site of Monte Alban in the southern Mexican state of Oaxaca we offer an appreciation of how the incremental nature of boundary-making, often driven by considerations unrelated to the site itself, has had fundamental and long-lasting effects on the site as it exists today. For example, over time changes in questions important to archaeologists led to a shift from a focus on monumental architecture to patterns of residence and economic use of space, a shift leading to a redefinition of “site” quite different from the legal boundaries established by government action. And regional population and economic growth spread human use of space into areas archaeologists see as integral to the site as they currently define it. Thus, boundary-making must be seen as dynamic and contended rather than static, requiring site managers and their administrative superiors to anticipate change rather than simply react to it. Successful site management does not mean achieving greater technical capacity but the ability to coordinate multidisciplinary teams and to collaborate with other sectors and jurisdictions. As Monte Alban gained international stature and visibility, some of its boundaries, e.g., the quality of planning or of visitor services, moved from local to international in scope. Organizational density and organizational complexity require managerial skills still not universally accepted by specialists in traditional disciplines or operational roles. We refer to these emerging forms as social management to differentiate them from traditional administrative roles grounded in hierarchy and function. Monte Alban became a world leader in social management precisely because it developed the capacity to negotiate, communicate, resolve conflicts, and anticipate change.
Keywords
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
References
Brown, J., & Hay-Edie, T. (2014). Engaging local communities in a stewardship of World Heritage. Paris: UNESCO World Heritage Centre.
Castillo Mena, A. R. (Ed.). (2015). Personas y Comunidades: Actas de Segundo Congreso de Buenas Practicas en Patrimonio Mundial. Madrid: Universidad Complutense de Madrid.
Corbett, J. (2016). Shifting Models of Heritage management and organizational process in multi-stakeholder settings. Paper Presented at American Historical Association, Atlanta, Georgia.
Corbett, J. (2008). Heritage management in an era of unruly stakeholders. Paper presented at Sixth World Archaeological Congress, Dublin, Ireland.
Corbett, J., & Robles García, N. (2014). From cultural landscapes to Orgscape. Paper presented at Heritage and Healthy Societies Conference, University of Massachusetts. Amherst, MA.
Corbett, J., & Gonzalez Alafita, O. (2002). Crecimiento Urbano, Deterioro Ambiental, y el Futuro de Monte Alban. In N. Robles García (Ed.), Monte Alban y la Sociedad Contemporanea (pp. 337–346). Mexico, D.F.: Instituto Nacional de Antropologia e Historia.
Ley Organica del Instituto Nacional de Antropologia e Historia, Diario de la Federacion el 3 de febrero de 1939. Mexico, D.F.
Mitchell, N., Rössler, M., & Tricaud, P.-M. (2009). World Heritage cultural landscapes. Paris: UNESCO World Heritage Centre.
Robles García, N., (2010). La integracion de estrategias de Conservacion Arqueologica Regional: el Plan de Manejo de Monte Alban, Oaxaca. In XXIX Mesa Redonda de la Sociedad Mexicana de Antropologia, Puebla.
Robles García, N., & Corbett, J. (2014a). Community strategies in the management of a World Heritage site. Paper presented at Eighteenth General Assembly of the International Council on Monuments and Sites, Florence, Italy.
Robles García, N., & Corbett, J. (2014b). From cultural landscape to Orgscape. Paper presented at Heritage and Healthy Societies Conference, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA.
Robles García, N., & Corbett, J. (2013). Can organizations learn? Exploring a shift from conflict to cooperation. George Wright Forum, 30(3), 267–272.
Robles García, N., & Corbett, J. (2010a). Heritage resource management in Mexico. In P. Messenger & G. Smith (Eds.), Cultural Heritage management: A global perspective (pp. 111–123). Gainesville, FL: University of Florida Press.
Robles García, N., & Corbett, J. (2010b). Managing the site-society interface: Communities and stakeholders at Mexican World Heritage sites. Paper presented at UNESCO Conference on World Heritage and Tourism, QC, Canada.
Robles García, N., & Juarez Osnaya, A. (2004). Historia de la Arqueologia en Oaxaca. Oaxaca: Conaculta-INAH and Gobierno del Estado de Oaxaca.
UNESCO World Heritage Committee. (2011). Sharing best practices in World Heritage Management. Paris: UNESCO World Heritage Centre.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Robles García, N., Corbett, J. (2018). From Archaeological Site to World Heritage Site: The Emergence of Social Management at Monte Alban, Mexico. In: Makuvaza, S. (eds) Aspects of Management Planning for Cultural World Heritage Sites. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69856-4_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69856-4_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-69855-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-69856-4
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)