Skip to main content

Performance Analysis of AIN-PT, AIN-SLT and SIIT Network-Based Translators

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes on Data Engineering and Communications Technologies ((LNDECT,volume 13))

Abstract

This paper evaluates and compares the performance of some selected network-based translators (e.g. SIIT, AIN-SLT and AIN-PT). The rationale behind this paper is to investigate the performance of heterogeneous networks (i.e. IPv4/IPv6 networks) when different types of network-based translators are used. The SIIT protocol translates full IP packet headers when connections are initiated from IPv4-only networks to IPv6-only networks and vice-versa. Whereas, the AIN-PT protocol uses tunneling approach to achieve the interoperability between IPv4-only/IPv6-only networks without translating full IP packet headers. Similarly, the AIN-SLT protocol uses the IPv6/IPv4 socket Application Programming Interface (API) translation technique instead of translating the packet headers between two heterogeneous networks. This could be achieved by ending IPv6/IPv4 connection points at the application layer. The experimental results show that the performance analysis of AIN-PT protocol is much better than that of SIIT and AIN-SLT protocols.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Nordmark, E., Gilligan, R.: Basic transition mechanisms for IPv6 hosts and routers. Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) RFC 4213 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hamarsheh, A., Goossens, M.: Illustrating the impediments for widespread deployment of IPv6. In: Proceedings of the SITE 2012, Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Telecommunications and Informatics, Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Signal Processing, Saint Malo, Mont Saint-Michel, France, pp. 19–25 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hamarsheh, A., Goossens, M.: A review: breaking the deadlocks for transition to IPv6. IETE Tech. Rev. 31(6), 405–421 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bao, C., Li, X., Baker, F., Anderson, T., Gont, F.: IP/ICMP translation algorithm. Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) RFC 7915 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hamarsheh, A., Goossens, M., Al-Qerem, A.: Assuring interoperability between heterogeneous (IPv4/IPv6) networks without using protocol translation. IETE Tech. Rev. 29(2), 114–132 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hamarsheh, A., Goossens, M., Alasem, R.: AIN-SLT: assuring interoperability between heterogeneous networks (IPv4/IPv6) using socket-layer translator. Am. J. Sci. Res. 15, 33–43 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Thomson, S., Huitema, C., Ksinant, V., Souissi, M.: Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) RFC 3596 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Tsirtsis, G., Srisuresh, P.: Network address translation - protocol translation (NAT-PT). Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) RFC 2766 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Aoun, C., Davies, E.: Reasons to move the network address translator - protocol translator (NAT-PT) to historic status. Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) RFC 4966 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Baker, F., Li, X., Yin, K.: Framework for IPv4/IPv6 translation. Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) RFC 6144 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gamess, E., Surós, R.: An upper bound model for TCP and UDP throughput in IPv4 and IPv6. J. Netw. Comput. Appl. 31(4), 585–602 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Li, F., Yang, J., Jianping, W., Zheng, Z., Wang, X.: Configuration analysis and recommendation: case studies in IPv6 networks. Comput. Commun. 53, 37–51 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. OMNeT ++ Network Simulation Framework. https://www.omnetpp.org. Accessed Aug 2017

  14. Gamer, T., Scharf, M.: Realistic simulation environments for IP-based networks. In: Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Simulation Tools and Techniques for Communications, Networks and Systems and Workshops, SIMUTools 2008, pp. 83–9 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ala Hamarsheh .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Hamarsheh, A., Eleyat, M. (2018). Performance Analysis of AIN-PT, AIN-SLT and SIIT Network-Based Translators. In: Xhafa, F., Caballé, S., Barolli, L. (eds) Advances on P2P, Parallel, Grid, Cloud and Internet Computing. 3PGCIC 2017. Lecture Notes on Data Engineering and Communications Technologies, vol 13. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69835-9_35

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69835-9_35

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-69834-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-69835-9

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics