Skip to main content

Lies, Damn Lies, Alternative Facts, Fake News, Propaganda, Pinocchios, Pants on Fire, Disinformation, Misinformation, Post-Truth, Data, and Statistics

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Free Speech and False Speech

Abstract

The first chapter of this book sets the stage for the legal analysis that makes up the bulk of the project. It will pay special attention to the political discourse about dishonesty surrounding the 2016 presidential campaign. The chapter will begin with a discussion of the way discourses about political deception and dishonesty permeated the 2016 campaign and the early stages of the Trump presidency. This will be a brief discussion looking at a few categories of discursive objects that were the highest-profile parts of the election. It will look at the concept of “fake news” and how that term evolved in its use through Trump, his opponents, and his surrogates. This will lead into a discussion about the debate within the news media about how to handle (i.e. describe) false statements President Trump made during the campaign, through the transition, and into the beginning of his presidency. The chapter concludes with an explanation of the notion of “post-truth” politics as it was defined through the lens of the Trump era.

I wouldn’t believe Donald Trump if his tongue were notarized. Alair Townsend, Former New York City Deputy Mayor

Singer (2016, p. 89)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    There was an ongoing debate about whether Donald Trump’s behavior constituted what could be labeled as “authoritarian.” Before the 2016 Republican Party presidential primary was even completed, University of Massachusetts political scientist Matthew McWilliams (2016) made the argument that the classic “authoritarian personality” was the best predictor of whether a voter would be a Trump supporter. Wendy Rahn and Eric Oliver (2016) writing for The Washington Post countered that Trump’s voters were actually more populist than authoritarian. This debate about the threat of Trump’s authoritarian tendencies carried over from the campaign into his presidency with some, such as The New Republic’s Brian Beutler (2017), arguing that Trump’s hinting at the possibility of firing special counsel Robert Mueller who was, as of this writing, investigating Russia’s interference in the 2016 election and the possibility of collusion with the Trump campaign , was an indication of such tendencies.

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Spicer, R.N. (2018). Lies, Damn Lies, Alternative Facts, Fake News, Propaganda, Pinocchios, Pants on Fire, Disinformation, Misinformation, Post-Truth, Data, and Statistics. In: Free Speech and False Speech. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69820-5_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics