Advertisement

Individual Differences in L2 Processing of Multi-word Phrases: Effects of Working Memory and Personality

  • Elma KerzEmail author
  • Daniel WiechmannEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10596)

Abstract

There is an accumulating body of evidence that knowledge of the statistics of multiword phrases (MWP) facilitates native language learning and processing both in children and adults. However, less is known about whether adult second language (L2) learners are able to develop native-like sensitivity to the statistics of MWP, and more importantly up until now no attempt has been made to determine to what extent variation in this ability is related to individual differences (IDs) in cognitive and affective factors. Using a within-subject design embedded in an individual-differences framework, the aim of the present study was twofold: (1) to replicate the MWP frequency effect reported in Hernandez et al. [1] with another sample of L2 learners, and (2) to determine to what extent variation in online L2 processing of MWP can be accounted for by two IDs measures, working memory (WM) and personality. We could replicate the frequency effect for MWP from the high frequency band but not for MWP from the low frequency band. Our findings revealed that while there was no main effect of WM, the Openness personality trait had a statistically significant impact on online L2 processing of MWP. However, subsequent analyses yielded three significant two-way interactions indicating that the relationship between WM, personality and online L2 processing of MWP is a complex one. Taken together our findings underscore the importance of further investigation of L2 learners’ ability to keep track of and build up knowledge of the statistics of MWPs as well as the interrelationships between the cognitive and affective IDs that impact the development of such ability.

References

  1. 1.
    Hernández, M., Costa, A., Arnon, I.: More than words: multiword frequency effects in non-native speakers. Lang. Cogn. Neurosci. 31(6), 785–800 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Beckner, C., Blythe, R., Bybee, J., Christiansen, M.H., Croft, W., Ellis, N.C., Holland, J., Ke, J., Larsen-Freeman, D., Schoenemann, T.: Language is a complex adaptive system: position paper. Lang. Learn. 59(s1), 1–26 (2009)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    McClelland, J.L., Botvinick, M.M., Noelle, D.C., Plaut, D.C., Rogers, T.T., Seidenberg, M.S., Smith, L.B.: Letting structure emerge: connectionist and dynamical systems approaches to cognition. Trends Cogn. Sci. 14(8), 348–356 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Christiansen, M.H., Chater, N., Culicover, P.W.: Creating Language: Integrating Evolution, Acquisition, and Processing. MIT Press, Cambridge (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Armstrong, B.C., Frost, R., Christiansen, M.H.: The long road of statistical learning research: past, present and future. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 372(1711) (2017)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Diessel, H.: Frequency effects in language acquisition, language use, and diachronic change. New Ideas Psychol. 25(2), 108–127 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ambridge, B., Kidd, E., Rowland, C.F., Theakston, A.L.: The ubiquity of frequency effects in first language acquisition. J. Child Lang. 42(02), 239–273 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Pinker, S., Poeppel, D.: Words and rules: the ingredients of language. Nature 403(6768), 361 (2000)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Christiansen, M.H., Arnon, I.: More than words: the role of multiword sequences in language learning and use. Top. Cogn. Sci. 9, 542–551 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bannard, C., Lieven, E.: Formulaic language in L1 acquisition. Annu. Rev. Appl. Linguist. 32, 3–16 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Conklin, K., Schmitt, N.: The processing of formulaic language. Annu. Rev. Appl. Linguist. 32, 45–61 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    MacWhinney, B.: The CHILDES system. Am. J. Speech Lang. Pathol. 5(1), 5–14 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Cameron-Faulkner, T., Lieven, E., Tomasello, M.: A construction based analysis of child directed speech. Cogn. Sci. 27(6), 843–873 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lieven, E., Salomo, D., Tomasello, M.: Two-year-old children’s production of multiword utterances: a usage-based analysis. Cogn. Linguist. 20(3), 481–507 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kol, S., Nir, B., Wintner, S.: Computational evaluation of the traceback method. J. Child Lang. 41(01), 176–199 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    McCauley, S.M., Christiansen, M.H.: Computational investigations of multiword chunks in language learning (2015)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bannard, C., Matthews, D.: Stored word sequences in language learning: the effect of familiarity on children’s repetition of four-word combinations. Psychol. Sci. 19(3), 241–248 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Matthews, D., Bannard, C.: Childrens production of unfamiliar word sequences is predicted by positional variability and latent classes in a large sample of child-directed speech. Cogn. Sci. 34(3), 465–488 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Arnon, I., Snider, N.: More than words: frequency effects for multi-word phrases. J. Mem. Lang. 62(1), 67–82 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Tremblay, A., Derwing, B., Libben, G., Westbury, C.: Processing advantages of lexical bundles: evidence from self-paced reading and sentence recall tasks. Lang. Learn. 61(2), 569–613 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Siyanova-Chanturia, A., Conklin, K., Schmitt, N.: Adding more fuel to the fire: An eye-tracking study of idiom processing by native and non-native speakers. Second Lang. Res. 27(2), 251–272 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Conklin, K., Schmitt, N.: Formulaic sequences: are they processed more quickly than nonformulaic language by native and nonnative speakers? Appl. Linguist. 29(1), 72–89 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ellis, N.C., Simpson-vlach, R., Maynard, C.: Formulaic language in native and second language speakers: psycholinguistics, corpus linguistics, and tesol. Tesol Q. 42(3), 375–396 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Durrant, P., Doherty, A.: Are high-frequency collocations psychologically real? Investigating the thesis of collocational priming. Corpus Linguist. Linguist. Theory 6(2), 125–155 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Arnon, I., McCauley, S.M., Christiansen, M.H.: Digging up the building blocks of language: age-of-acquisition effects for multiword phrases. J. Mem. Lang. 92, 265–280 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Mitchell, R., Myles, F., Marsden, E.: Second Language Learning Theories. Routledge, Abingdon (2013)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Dörnyei, Z., Skehan, P.: Individual differences in second language learning. In: Doughty, C.J., Long, M.H. (eds.) The Handbook of Second Language Acquisition, pp. 589–630. Blackwell, Oxford (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Dewaele, J.-M.: Individual differences in second language acquisition. In: The New Handbook of Second Language Acquisition, vol. 2, pp. 623–646 (2009)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Baddeley, A.D., Hitch, G.: Working memory. Psychol. Learn. Motiv. 8, 47–89 (1974)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Daneman, M., Carpenter, P.A.: Individual differences in working memory and reading. J. Verbal Learn. Verbal Behav. 19(4), 450–466 (1980)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Miyake, A., Shah, P.: MoDels of Working Memory: Mechanisms of Active Maintenance and Executive Control. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Baddeley, A.: Working Memory, Thought, and Action, vol. 45. OUP, Oxford (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Kane, M.J., Conway, A.R., Hambrick, D.Z., Engle, R.W.: Variation in working memory capacity as variation in executive attention and control. In: Variation in Working Memory, vol. 1, pp. 21–48 (2007)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Baddeley, A.: Working memory: looking back and looking forward. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 4(10), 829–839 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Cowan, N.: Working Memory Capacity. Psychology Press, Hove (2012)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Carpenter, P.A., Just, M.A.: The role of working memory in language comprehension. In: Klahr, D., Kotovsky, K. (eds.) Complex Information Processing: The Impact of Herbert A. Simon, pp. 31–68. Erlbaum, Hillsdale (1989)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Miyake, A., Just, M.A., Carpenter, P.A.: Working memory constraints on the resolution of lexical ambiguity: maintaining multiple interpretations in neutral contexts. J. Mem. Lang. 33(2), 175 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Juffs, A., Harrington, M.: Aspects of working memory in L2 learning. Lang. Teach. 44(02), 137–166 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Williams, J.N.: Working memory and SLA. In: Gass, S., Mackey, A. (eds.) The Routledge Handbook of Second Language Acquisition, pp. 427–441. Routledge, London (2012)Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Wen, Z., Mota, M.B., McNeill, A.: Working Memory in Second Language Acquisition and Processing, vol. 87. Multilingual Matters, Bristol (2015)Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Robinson, P.: Effects of individual differences in intelligence, aptitude and working memory on adult incidental SLA. In: Robinson, P. (ed.) Individual Differences and Instructed Language Learning, pp. 211–266. John Benjamins, Amsterdam (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Skehan, P.: Theorising and updating aptitude. Individ. Differ. Instruct. Lang. Learn. 2, 69–94 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Bolibaugh, C., Foster, P.: Memory-based aptitude for nativelike selection: the role of phonological short-term memory. In: Granena, G., Long, M. (eds.) Sensitive Periods, Language Aptitude, and Ultimate L2 Attainment, vol. 35, p. 205. John Benjamins Publishing Company, Amsterdam (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Foster, P., Bolibaugh, C., Kotula, A.: Knowledge of nativelike selections in a L2. Stud. Second Lang. Acquis. 36(01), 101–132 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Conway, A.R., Kane, M.J., Bunting, M.F., Hambrick, D.Z., Wilhelm, O., Engle, R.W.: Working memory span tasks: a methodological review and users guide. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 12(5), 769–786 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Linck, J.A., Osthus, P., Koeth, J.T., Bunting, M.F.: Working memory and second language comprehension and production: a meta-analysis. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 21(4), 861–883 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Allport, G.W.: Pattern and Growth in Personality. Holt, Rinehart & Winston, New York (1961)Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Dewaele, J.-M.: Personality in second language acquisition. In: Chapelle, C.A. (ed.) The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics. Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford (2013)Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Cervone, D., Pervin, L.A.: Personality Psychology. Wiley, Hoboken (2010)Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    John, O.P., Naumann, L.P., Soto, C.J.: Paradigm shift to the integrative big five trait taxonomy. In: John, O.P., Robins, R.W., Pervin, L.A. (eds.) Handbook of Personality: Theory and Research, vol. 3, pp. 114–158. Guilford Press, New York (2008)Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Ehrman, M.E., Oxford, R.L.: Cognition plus: correlates of language learning success. Mod. Lang. J. 79(1), 67–89 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Verhoeven, L., Vermeer, A.: Communicative competence and personality dimensions in first and second language learners. Appl. Psycholinguist. 23(03), 361–374 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Kaufman, S.B., DeYoung, C.G., Gray, J.R., Jiménez, L., Brown, J., Mackintosh, N.: Implicit learning as an ability. Cognition 116(3), 321–340 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Lemhöfer, K., Broersma, M.: Introducing lextale: a quick and valid lexical test for advanced learners of English. Behav. Res. Methods 44(2), 325–343 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Marian, V., Blumenfeld, H.K., Kaushanskaya, M.: The language experience and proficiency questionnaire (LEAP-Q): assessing language profiles in bilinguals and multilinguals. J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res. 50(4), 940–967 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Huibregtse, I., Admiraal, W., Meara, P.: Scores on a yes-no vocabulary test: correction for guessing and response style. Lang. Test. 19(3), 227–245 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Godfrey, J.J., Holliman, E.C., McDaniel, J.: Switchboard: telephone speech corpus for research and development. In: 1992 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, ICASSP-92, vol. 1, pp. 517–520. IEEE (1992)Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Cieri, C., Miller, D., Walker, K.: The fisher corpus: a resource for the next generations of speech-to-text. LREC 4, 69–71 (2004)Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Mathôt, S., Schreij, D., Theeuwes, J.: Opensesame: an open-source, graphical experiment builder for the social sciences. Behav. Res. Methods 44(2), 314–324 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Waters, G.S., Caplan, D.: Processing resource capacity and the comprehension of garden path sentences. Mem. Cogn. 24(3), 342–355 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Stone, J., Towse, J.: A working memory test battery: java-based collection of seven working memory tasks. J. Open Res. Softw. 3(1), e5 (2015)Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    von Bastian, C.C., Locher, A., Ruflin, M.: Tatool: a java-based open-source programming framework for psychological studies. Behav. Res. Methods 45(1), 108–115 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Barr, D.J., Levy, R., Scheepers, C., Tily, H.J.: Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: keep it maximal. J. Mem. Lang. 68(3), 255–278 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Durrant, P., Schmitt, N.: To what extent do native and non-native writers make use of collocations? IRAL Int. Rev. Appl. Linguist. Lang. Teach. 47(2), 157–177 (2009)Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Ehrman, M.: Personality and Good Language Learners, p. 6172. Cambridge Language Teaching Library. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2008)Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Gray, J.R., Braver, T.S.: Personality predicts working-memory related activation in the caudal anterior cingulate cortex. Cogn. Affect. Behav. Neurosci. 2(1), 64–75 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Dima, D., Friston, K.J., Stephan, K.E., Frangou, S.: Neuroticism and conscientiousness respectively constrain and facilitate short-term plasticity within the working memory neural network. Hum. Brain Mapp. 36(10), 4158–4163 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.RWTH Aachen UniversityAachenGermany
  2. 2.University of AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations