Skip to main content

Blocking Social Media. Reasoning and Legal Grounds

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Digital Transformation and Global Society (DTGS 2017)

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 745))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1336 Accesses

Abstract

Use of social media represents now a global trend that also contaminates the sphere of public administration and other governmental activities. Despite so wide use and popularity of social media among individuals, business and social institutes, they become more and more subject for censorship and blocking with different reasoning and outreach. Recent incidents all over the world show an emerging tendency to restrict social media use by companies, employers and the governments. It is worth noting, that not only China or North Korea which are traditionally famous for their restrictive policies towards Internet activities are spotted for blocking social media but a large part of African countries and even countries rather close to Europe, e.g. Turkey, Ukraine, Russia. The authors are seeking to provide a brief review of reasoning and legal grounds for social media blocking used by the governments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Bekkers, V., Edwards, A., De Kool, D.: Social media monitoring: responsive governance in the shadow of surveillance? Gov. Inf. Q. 30(4), 335–342 (2013). doi:10.1016/j.giq.2013.05.024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bertot, J.C., Jaeger, P.T., Hansen, D.: The impact of polices on government social media usage: Issues, challenges, and recommendations. Gov. Inf. Q. 29(1), 30–40 (2012). doi:10.1016/j.giq.2011.04.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bonson, E., Torres, L., Royo, S., Flores, F.: Local e-government 2.0: social media and corporate transparency in municipalities. Gov. Inf. Q. 29(2), 123–132 (2012). doi:10.1016/j.giq.2011.10.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Castells, M.: The new public sphere: global civil society, communication networks, and global governance. Ann. Acad. Polit. Soc. Sci. 616(1), 78–93 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Danish Ministry Releases Plan to Block Online Propaganda of Terrorism (2017). https://sputniknews.com/europe/201701121049539296-denmark-government-online-propaganda/

  6. DeNardis, L., Hackl, A.M.: Internet governance by social media platforms. Telecommun. Policy 39(9), 761–770 (2015). doi:10.1016/j.telpol.2015.04.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Dimov, D.: Restricting social media at work (2013). http://resources.infosecinstitute.com/restricting-social-media-at-work/

  8. Dumas, C.D., Atrey, A., Lee, J., Harrison, T.M., Fake, T., Zhao, X., Ravi, S.S.: E-petition information diffusion in online social networks. In: Proceedings of 17th International Digital Government Research Conference on Digital Government Research (dg.o 2016), pp. 515–517. ACM, New York (2016). doi:10.1145/2912160.2912227

  9. E-Petitions of UK Government and Parliament. https://petition.parliament.uk/

  10. Feng, G.C., Guo, S.Z.: Tracing the route of China’s internet censorship: an empirical study. Telemat. Inform. 30(4), 335–345 (2013). doi:10.1016/j.tele.2012.09.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hong, H.: Government websites and social media’s influence on government-public relationships. Publ. Relat. Rev. 39(4), 346–356 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hrdinová, J., Helbig, N., Peters, C.S.: Designing social media policy for government: eight essential elements (2010). https://www.ctg.albany.edu/publications/guides/social_media_policy/social_media_policy.pdf

  13. Imani Giglou, R., d’Haenens, L., Ogan, C.: Turkish diasporic responses to the Taksim square protests: legacy media and social media uses in Belgium, the Netherlands and Germany. Telemat. Inform. 34(2), 548–559 (2017). doi:10.1016/j.tele.2016.09.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kharroub, T., Bas, O.: Social media and protests: an examination of Twitter images of the 2011 Egyptian revolution. N. Media Soc. 18(9), 1973–1992 (2015). doi:10.1177/1461444815571914

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kim, S.K., Park, M.J., Rho, J.J.: Effect of the government’s use of social media on the reliability of the government: focus on Twitter. Publ. Manag. Rev. 17(3), 328–355 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kozhamberdiyeva, Z.: Freedom of expression on the internet: a case study of Uzbekistan. Rev. Central East Eur. Law 33(1), 95–134 (2008). doi:10.1163/092598808X262542

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Lee, F.L.F., Chen, H., Chan, M.: Social media use and university students’ participation in a large-scale protest campaign: the case of Hong Kong’s Umbrella Movement. Telemat. Inform. 34(2), 457–469 (2017). doi:10.1016/j.tele.2016.08.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lee, G., Kwak, Y.H.: An open government maturity model for social media-based public engagement. Gov. Inf. Q. 29(4), 492–503 (2012). doi:10.1016/j.giq.2012.06.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Linders, D.: From e-government to we-government: defining a typology for citizen coproduction in the age of social media. Gov. Inf. Q. 29(4), 446–454 (2012). doi:10.1016/j.giq.2012.06.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Mergel, I., Bretschneider, S.I.: A three-stage adoption process for social media use in government. Publ. Adm. Rev. 73(3), 390–400 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Mickoleit, A.: Social media use by governments: a policy primer to discuss trends, identify policy opportunities and guide decision makers. In: OECD Working Papers on Public Governance, vol. 26. OECD Publishing, Paris (2014). doi:10.1787/5jxrcmghmk0s-en

  22. Mossberger, K., Wu, Y., Crawford, J.: Connecting citizens and local governments? Social media and interactivity in major U.S. cities. Gov. Inf. Q. 30(4), 351–358 (2013). doi:10.1016/j.giq.2013.05.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Nam, T.: A tool for liberty or oppression? A cross-national study of the internet’s influence on democracy. Telemat. Inform. 34(5), 538–549 (2016). doi:10.1016/j.tele.2016.11.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Nurullaev, R.: Website blocking in Russia: recent trends. Comput. Law Secur. Rev. 33(20), 211–222 (2016). doi:10.1016/j.clsr.2016.11.010

    Google Scholar 

  25. Picazo-Vela, S., Guitiérrez-Martínez, I., Luna-Reyes, L.F.: Understanding risks, benefits, and strategic alternatives of social media applications in the public sector. Gov. Inf. Q. 29(4), 504–511 (2012). doi:10.1016/j.giq.2012.07.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Poell, T., Abdulla, R., Rieder, B., Woltering, R., Zack, L.: Protest leadership in the age of social media. Inf. Commun. Soc. 19(7), 994–1014 (2016). doi:10.1080/1369118X.2015.1088049

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Rath, K.: E-petitions get 6.4 million signatures in a year (2012). http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-19266497

  28. Said, G.R.E.: The internet social media and the Arab spring: a study of Egyptian users’ usability. In: Vision 2020: Innovation, Development Sustainability, and Economic Growth - Proceedings of 21st International Business Information Management Association Conference, IBIMA, p. 615 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Seliger, B., Schmidt, S.: The hermit kingdom goes online ··· information technology, internet use and communication policy in North Korea. North Korean Rev. 10(1), 71–88 (2014). doi:10.3172/NKR.10.1.71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Servaes, J.: The many faces of (soft) power, democracy and the internet. Telemat. Inform. 30(4), 322–330 (2013). doi:10.1016/j.tele.2013.04.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Silencing the Messenger: Communication Apps Under Pressure. Freedom on the Net 2016 Report (2016). https://freedomhouse.org/sites/default/files/FOTN_2016_Full_Report.pdf

  32. Staniforth, A., Nitsch, H.: Preventing terrorism together. A framework to provide social media anti-radicalization training for credible community voices. In: Emerging Trends in ICT Security, pp. 549–556 (2013). doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-411474-6.00034-7

  33. We Are Social’s. Digital in 2016, Special Report (2016). http://wearesocial.com/uk/special-reports/digital-in-2016

  34. Zheng, L., Zheng, T.: Innovation through social media in the public sector: information and interactions. Gov. Inf. Q. 31(Suppl. 1), S106–S117 (2014). doi:10.1016/j.giq.2014.01.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Zheng, L.: Social media in Chinese government: drivers, challenges and capabilities. Gov. Inf. Q. 30(4), 369–376 (2013). doi:10.1016/j.giq.2013.05.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ekaterina Shireeva .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Shireeva, E., Martynov, A., Kaplunov, A., Ukhov, V. (2017). Blocking Social Media. Reasoning and Legal Grounds. In: Alexandrov, D., Boukhanovsky, A., Chugunov, A., Kabanov, Y., Koltsova, O. (eds) Digital Transformation and Global Society. DTGS 2017. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 745. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69784-0_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69784-0_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-69783-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-69784-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics