Skip to main content

Principles and Platitudes

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Perception and Discovery

Part of the book series: Synthese Library ((SYLI,volume 389))

Abstract

One thing we noted in the last chapter was how the label “law of nature” is applied to several quite different types of statement. Boyle’s law is a straightforward law of nature. So is Snell’s law. Snell’s law, however, involves a theoretical term—“light ray.” Boyle’s law requires no such term. The laws of motion and of electromagnetics and thermodynamics are laws of nature, too, and they are riddled with theoretical terms, being less like formal summaries of what we observe and more like the axioms of a calculus. Thus, we are versatile in our use of the expression “law of nature.”

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Hanson’s italics. –WCH.

References

  • Cohen, Morris Raphael, and Ernest Nagel. 1934. An introduction to logic and scientific method. New York: Harcourt, Brace.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mill, J. S. (1965). A system of logic: Ratiocinative and inductive. London: Longmans, Green and Co..

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Lund, M.D. (2018). Principles and Platitudes. In: Lund, M.D. (eds) Perception and Discovery. Synthese Library, vol 389. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69745-1_21

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics