Abstract
One thing we noted in the last chapter was how the label “law of nature” is applied to several quite different types of statement. Boyle’s law is a straightforward law of nature. So is Snell’s law. Snell’s law, however, involves a theoretical term—“light ray.” Boyle’s law requires no such term. The laws of motion and of electromagnetics and thermodynamics are laws of nature, too, and they are riddled with theoretical terms, being less like formal summaries of what we observe and more like the axioms of a calculus. Thus, we are versatile in our use of the expression “law of nature.”
Notes
- 1.
Hanson’s italics. –WCH.
References
Cohen, Morris Raphael, and Ernest Nagel. 1934. An introduction to logic and scientific method. New York: Harcourt, Brace.
Mill, J. S. (1965). A system of logic: Ratiocinative and inductive. London: Longmans, Green and Co..
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lund, M.D. (2018). Principles and Platitudes. In: Lund, M.D. (eds) Perception and Discovery. Synthese Library, vol 389. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69745-1_21
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69745-1_21
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-69744-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-69745-1
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)